Clarence Thomas saves Lindsey Graham

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Is that dirt bag finally out of options?

Seems like it - will see what the Jury thinks.

[Anonymous]

Graham can still assert his rights under the Fifth Amendment and more likely, the Speech and Debate Clause. Foot dragging is not over by a long shot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Graham can still assert his rights under the Fifth Amendment and more likely, the Speech and Debate Clause. Foot dragging is not over by a long shot.

why did he fight if he could do that?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Graham can still assert his rights under the Fifth Amendment and more likely, the Speech and Debate Clause. Foot dragging is not over by a long shot.

why did he fight if he could do that?

He needed something to do?

He has a cushy job.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Graham can still assert his rights under the Fifth Amendment and more likely, the Speech and Debate Clause. Foot dragging is not over by a long shot.

why did he fight if he could do that?

Because only guilty people plead the fifth, says his master, djt.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Is that dirt bag finally out of options?

Sadly, no. The Court left room for him to challenge every single question in district court. Appealed to the Circuit Ct. Appealed to SCOTUS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Graham can still assert his rights under the Fifth Amendment and more likely, the Speech and Debate Clause. Foot dragging is not over by a long shot.

why did he fight if he could do that?

5th A, yes. Speech and Debate clause is what SCOTUS just turned him down on.

[Anonymous]

Thank you Justice Thomas!