Clarence Thomas saves Lindsey Graham

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What is Thomas’ rationale for not excusing himself?

Because there is no code of ethics for SCOTUS.

Roberts should have asked his to Recuse.

Roberts is a true believing POS.

Roberts is a total POS and has overseen the downfall of the court.

Oh for sure. He behaves more or less normally, but he’s up there with Donald Trump as one of the worst, most damaging Americans ever to have lived.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What is Thomas’ rationale for not excusing himself?

Because there is no code of ethics for SCOTUS.

Roberts should have asked his to Recuse.

Roberts is a true believing POS.

Roberts is a total POS and has overseen the downfall of the court.

Oh for sure. He behaves more or less normally, but he’s up there with Donald Trump as one of the worst, most damaging Americans ever to have lived.

No, he's not. There are lot worse than he. McConnell, for one.

[Anonymous]

This is all just part of the game to push everything off until after midterms because Rs think they can take control of Congress, and many of the local elections.

[Anonymous]

It’s an administrative stay. Absolutely routine. The full court can now vote on the stay based on briefing.

[Anonymous]

I swear to god, you people better vote to save democracy.

[NP]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It’s an administrative stay. Absolutely routine. The full court can now vote on the stay based on briefing.

We already know the vote 6 to 3 in his favor.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is all just part of the game to push everything off until after midterms because Rs think they can take control of Congress, and many of the local elections.

Seems like they will

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I swear to god, you people better vote to save democracy.

[NP]

Did so a week ago.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I swear to god, you people better vote to save democracy.

[NP]

I live in Don Beyer's district. I will vote for him, but my vote essentially doesn't count.

It's not like I live in the Va-2.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It’s an administrative stay. Absolutely routine. The full court can now vote on the stay based on briefing.

Sorry but the optics are terrible.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s an administrative stay. Absolutely routine. The full court can now vote on the stay based on briefing.

Sorry but the optics are terrible.

And there’s no reason for SCOTUS to weigh in on a unanimous appellate decision. It’s not like another appellate court went a different way on the same issue.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s an administrative stay. Absolutely routine. The full court can now vote on the stay based on briefing.

Sorry but the optics are terrible.

And there’s no reason for SCOTUS to weigh in on a unanimous appellate decision. It’s not like another appellate court went a different way on the same issue.

Not how it works. This has nothing to do with the merits of the district court ruling compelling Graham to testify, which the 11th Circuit declined to stay.

[Anonymous]

Not really: https://www.cnn.com/2022/11/01/politics/lindsey-graham-supreme-court/index.html

The Supreme Court declined on Tuesday to block a subpoena for Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham to testify in front of an Atlanta grand jury investigating efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election in Georgia.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s an administrative stay. Absolutely routine. The full court can now vote on the stay based on briefing.

We already know the vote 6 to 3 in his favor.

Any other valuable insights?

[Anonymous]

Is that dirt bag finally out of options?