Clarence Thomas saves Lindsey Graham

Anonymous
Clarence Thomas was able to act alone to save Lindsey Graham from having to testify. Can do this because he oversees that jurisdiction. Clarence Thomas is so far compromised. It's scary. Billy Dems can get out and vote to get people in positions of power this go around
Anonymous
? what? How can he act alone to do this? How does that work?
jsteele
Site Admin Offline
This is temporary to allow the full court to weigh-in. Graham is not saved yet.
Anonymous
It's called a shadow docket where one judge gets to make a decision for the entire court over the area. They are presiding.
Each have different areas of the country and Lindsey Graham lucked out to get Clarence Thomas overseeing his area.
No, it doesn't get him off the hook fully but it certainly does for quite a while.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:It's called a shadow docket where one judge gets to make a decision for the entire court over the area. They are presiding.
Each have different areas of the country and Lindsey Graham lucked out to get Clarence Thomas overseeing his area.
No, it doesn't get him off the hook fully but it certainly does for quite a while.

Justice delayed is justice denied. I’m so sick of this.
Anonymous
How can Thomas weigh in on the "big lie" related case when his wife was involved in promoting the "big lie"! What kind of f'ed justice system we have!
Anonymous
Well to get to get around this you need to vote because the Democrats wanted to have more judicial transparency. Republicans all voted against it.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Well to get to get around this you need to vote because the Democrats wanted to have more judicial transparency. Republicans all voted against it.


I am voting. I am also making sure, my spouse, my adult children and my elder parents (who were naturalized a month back) vote. But I also know that this is not enough.
Anonymous
He should've recused himself. This is abhorrent.
Anonymous
What is Thomas’ rationale for not excusing himself?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:What is Thomas’ rationale for not excusing himself?


Because there is no code of ethics for SCOTUS.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:What is Thomas’ rationale for not excusing himself?


Because there is no code of ethics for SCOTUS.


Roberts should have asked his to Recuse.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:What is Thomas’ rationale for not excusing himself?


Because there is no code of ethics for SCOTUS.


Roberts should have asked his to Recuse.

Roberts is a true believing POS.
Anonymous
All unfortunately expected.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:What is Thomas’ rationale for not excusing himself?


Because there is no code of ethics for SCOTUS.


Roberts should have asked his to Recuse.

Roberts is a true believing POS.


Roberts is a total POS and has overseen the downfall of the court.
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: