So what happened to that "CRT" Youngkin and his voters were talking about

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Since CRT was "outed" they change the name of it, or don't name it at all but sprinkle the ideologies CRT encompasses throughout the various subjects taught. They usually couch it in words and terms that make it difficult for those people who know the truth to sound the alarm. Sorry people but look beyond the bubble from which you get your information and think for yourselves. CRT racist and divisive ideas are definitely being pushed on our children.


who is "they"
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Since CRT was "outed" they change the name of it, or don't name it at all but sprinkle the ideologies CRT encompasses throughout the various subjects taught. They usually couch it in words and terms that make it difficult for those people who know the truth to sound the alarm. Sorry people but look beyond the bubble from which you get your information and think for yourselves. CRT racist and divisive ideas are definitely being pushed on our children.


who is "they"


You know, "them."

CRT hasn't changed it's name -- it still refers to the same legal theory/body of scholarship it always has. Christopher Rufo said openly that he was using CRT, ignoring its actual content associating it with whatever the right bogeyman du jour is, so people would just call anything they didn't like CRT. And millions of idiots fell for it.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:No way it magically went away, right...RIGHT???


Of course not. In some cases school systems are doubling down on their commitment to “equity,” which is effectively CRT is practice.

This battle over the future of our schools and nation will play out for years to come - namely, is the goal to provide equal opportunity or to radically redistribute private wealth and societal resources to certain groups (principally ADOS) with the illusory goal of promoting equal outcomes.


Equity is not CRT. Educate yourself.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Since CRT was "outed" they change the name of it, or don't name it at all but sprinkle the ideologies CRT encompasses throughout the various subjects taught. They usually couch it in words and terms that make it difficult for those people who know the truth to sound the alarm. Sorry people but look beyond the bubble from which you get your information and think for yourselves. CRT racist and divisive ideas are definitely being pushed on our children.


The definition of CRT hasn't changed. The boogey man definition you keep associating it with has.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Since CRT was "outed" they change the name of it, or don't name it at all but sprinkle the ideologies CRT encompasses throughout the various subjects taught. They usually couch it in words and terms that make it difficult for those people who know the truth to sound the alarm. Sorry people but look beyond the bubble from which you get your information and think for yourselves. CRT racist and divisive ideas are definitely being pushed on our children.


who is "they"


You know, "them."

CRT hasn't changed it's name -- it still refers to the same legal theory/body of scholarship it always has. Christopher Rufo said openly that he was using CRT, ignoring its actual content associating it with whatever the right bogeyman du jour is, so people would just call anything they didn't like CRT. And millions of idiots fell for it.

He’s such a nice guy, too. So many positive, uplifting ideas about education.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:No way it magically went away, right...RIGHT???


Of course not. In some cases school systems are doubling down on their commitment to “equity,” which is effectively CRT is practice.

This battle over the future of our schools and nation will play out for years to come - namely, is the goal to provide equal opportunity or to radically redistribute private wealth and societal resources to certain groups (principally ADOS) with the illusory goal of promoting equal outcomes.

You fell for this, idiot.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:No way it magically went away, right...RIGHT???


I can't find the threads about it but Youngkin did some stuff, made some new rules about this issue.

I assume, since you missed it, that you don't have school-age kids.


I've got a special rock that keeps tigers away. I've never seen any tigers around while carrying it. Are you interested in buying it?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:No way it magically went away, right...RIGHT???


Of course not. In some cases school systems are doubling down on their commitment to “equity,” which is effectively CRT is practice.

This battle over the future of our schools and nation will play out for years to come - namely, is the goal to provide equal opportunity or to radically redistribute private wealth and societal resources to certain groups (principally ADOS) with the illusory goal of promoting equal outcomes.


No school system is doing that or else you'd hear about it, sweetie. Fox would cover it like a fly on shit. OP meant that there was never any CRT to begin with. You got played, its okay.


DP. Wrong. Of course you are correct that most are not reporting it. Can’t imagine why! Educate yourself.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/schools-teach-crt-critical-race-theory-deny-propaganda-politics-history-11662997649?st=yhgxcp0x873ixxi&reflink=article_copyURL_share

https://www.wsj.com/articles/if-students-dont-learn-critical-race-theory-why-do-teachers-pacific-educational-group-school-board-administrators-students-class-11662150413
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:No way it magically went away, right...RIGHT???


Of course not. In some cases school systems are doubling down on their commitment to “equity,” which is effectively CRT is practice.

This battle over the future of our schools and nation will play out for years to come - namely, is the goal to provide equal opportunity or to radically redistribute private wealth and societal resources to certain groups (principally ADOS) with the illusory goal of promoting equal outcomes.


NO NO And no

There is not one public school in the US teaching CRT, not one!


Try reading cognitively I know it's hard.

But your boys ban books and teach what Two sides to the Holocaust?? There are no two sides!

If you’re still defending the one term, twice impeached, coup plotting, insurrection inciting, nuclear secrets stealing, fifth amendment pleading conman whose business was just sued by the state of NY for fraud and criminally referred to the DOJ - you are an idiot


Anonymous
YOUNGKIN IS A LIAR THAT IS A FACT

He is going to destroy VA schools Destroy them.
He wants the Betsey Devos model. Well look at how that worked out for the states that buy into that crap.

Not to mention it's all about monies he's already contracted with DeVos.

Anyone who voted for Youngkin needs a brain scan.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Since CRT was "outed" they change the name of it, or don't name it at all but sprinkle the ideologies CRT encompasses throughout the various subjects taught. They usually couch it in words and terms that make it difficult for those people who know the truth to sound the alarm. Sorry people but look beyond the bubble from which you get your information and think for yourselves. CRT racist and divisive ideas are definitely being pushed on our children.


Sound the alarm about what exactly?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:No way it magically went away, right...RIGHT???


Of course not. In some cases school systems are doubling down on their commitment to “equity,” which is effectively CRT is practice.

This battle over the future of our schools and nation will play out for years to come - namely, is the goal to provide equal opportunity or to radically redistribute private wealth and societal resources to certain groups (principally ADOS) with the illusory goal of promoting equal outcomes.


No school system is doing that or else you'd hear about it, sweetie. Fox would cover it like a fly on shit. OP meant that there was never any CRT to begin with. You got played, its okay.


DP. Wrong. Of course you are correct that most are not reporting it. Can’t imagine why! Educate yourself.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/schools-teach-crt-critical-race-theory-deny-propaganda-politics-history-11662997649?st=yhgxcp0x873ixxi&reflink=article_copyURL_share

https://www.wsj.com/articles/if-students-dont-learn-critical-race-theory-why-do-teachers-pacific-educational-group-school-board-administrators-students-class-11662150413


You are citing personal opinion pieces from people who are objecting to a high school literature unit using books addressing cultural identity and changing the planned lesson in history class one day to cover important current events. Most people would call that good teaching, but either way, it doesn't support your premise about "equity."
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:No way it magically went away, right...RIGHT???


Of course not. In some cases school systems are doubling down on their commitment to “equity,” which is effectively CRT is practice.

This battle over the future of our schools and nation will play out for years to come - namely, is the goal to provide equal opportunity or to radically redistribute private wealth and societal resources to certain groups (principally ADOS) with the illusory goal of promoting equal outcomes.


No school system is doing that or else you'd hear about it, sweetie. Fox would cover it like a fly on shit. OP meant that there was never any CRT to begin with. You got played, its okay.


DP. Wrong. Of course you are correct that most are not reporting it. Can’t imagine why! Educate yourself.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/schools-teach-crt-critical-race-theory-deny-propaganda-politics-history-11662997649?st=yhgxcp0x873ixxi&reflink=article_copyURL_share

https://www.wsj.com/articles/if-students-dont-learn-critical-race-theory-why-do-teachers-pacific-educational-group-school-board-administrators-students-class-11662150413


You are citing personal opinion pieces from people who are objecting to a high school literature unit using books addressing cultural identity and changing the planned lesson in history class one day to cover important current events. Most people would call that good teaching, but either way, it doesn't support your premise about "equity."


And it's also not CRT.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:No way it magically went away, right...RIGHT???


Of course not. In some cases school systems are doubling down on their commitment to “equity,” which is effectively CRT is practice.

This battle over the future of our schools and nation will play out for years to come - namely, is the goal to provide equal opportunity or to radically redistribute private wealth and societal resources to certain groups (principally ADOS) with the illusory goal of promoting equal outcomes.


No school system is doing that or else you'd hear about it, sweetie. Fox would cover it like a fly on shit. OP meant that there was never any CRT to begin with. You got played, its okay.


DP. Wrong. Of course you are correct that most are not reporting it. Can’t imagine why! Educate yourself.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/schools-teach-crt-critical-race-theory-deny-propaganda-politics-history-11662997649?st=yhgxcp0x873ixxi&reflink=article_copyURL_share

https://www.wsj.com/articles/if-students-dont-learn-critical-race-theory-why-do-teachers-pacific-educational-group-school-board-administrators-students-class-11662150413


You are citing personal opinion pieces from people who are objecting to a high school literature unit using books addressing cultural identity and changing the planned lesson in history class one day to cover important current events. Most people would call that good teaching, but either way, it doesn't support your premise about "equity."


Since you (predictably) are misrepresenting what was actually in the pieces linked above (blatant examples of CRT), and probably counting on no one actually reading the links, here are some excerpts. Not sure where you got "one day" - this was ongoing for two months in the first example. "Good teaching"?? Maybe on whatever planet you're living on. I'd much prefer my child to read Macbeth in English class than this drivel, but YMMV:

"My daughter’s sophomore English class replaced its unit on Shakespeare’s “Macbeth” with a two-monthlong unit on cultural identity in which students read articles about “whiteness,” “queerness” and “cultural assimilation.” The same year, she experienced cultural- or racial-identity units in three other subjects: world history, health and even band.

Since middle school, her core subjects have routinely been interrupted for discussions of microaggressions, and she has been asked to create her ethnic and racial family tree five times. My younger daughter’s middle-school history teacher scrapped the required curriculum (the events leading to World War II) in favor of reading newspaper articles pushing for open borders and illegal immigration.

In my daughters’ history classes, essay prompts are no longer thought-provoking questions but slogans such as “No Human is Illegal” and “Decolonize Your Curriculum.” The slogan “Black Lives Matter” currently appears on the facades of our school buildings and on clothing worn by teachers.

Yet when parents express concern about CRT in the classroom, educators in our district deny its use or inundate us with psychobabble."

https://www.wsj.com/articles/schools-teach-crt-critical-race-theory-deny-propaganda-politics-history-11662997649?st=yhgxcp0x873ixxi&reflink=article_copyURL_share

Documents emailed from 2019 to 2021 by Pacific Educational Group to district administrators in advance of various training seminars cite critical race theory explicitly. A rubric dated Feb. 4, 2020, encourages participants to “Deconstruct the Presence and role of Whiteness” in their lives. A March 17, 2020, presentation lists “aspects and assumptions of white culture” in the U.S. Some are negative, such as “win at all costs,” “wealth = worth,” “don’t show emotion,” and in reference to food, “bland is best.” Others are seemingly universal principles such as “cause-and-effect relationships,” “objective, rational, linear thinking,” and “plan for future.”

That presentation also spells out the “5 tenets of critical race theory” to “better understand the critical intersection of race and schooling.” One tenet is the “permanence of racism,” or the idea that “racism is endemic to all our institutions, systems and structures” in the U.S. Another is “whiteness as property.” The “critique of liberalism” tenet argues that “colorblindness,” “neutrality of the law” and the “myth of meritocracy” must be “deconstructed.”

These tenets aren’t presented as abstract notions for faculty to consider, but ideas they’re meant to apply. School staff’s ability to use “critical race theory . . . to inform racial equity leadership and analysis of school policies, practices and procedures” is considered a sign of the successful “internalization and application” of Pacific Educational Group’s framework. And a chart includes “Critical Race Theory” as a step toward “Equity/Anti-Racism School Transformation Action Planning.” A Feb. 3, 2021, seminar is even titled “Using Critical Race Theory to Transform Leadership and District.”

Perhaps districts like Tredyffrin-Easttown think they can shoo parents away by making a distinction between teacher training and curriculum. But what is the point of teacher training if not to inform teachers on how they should teach?

https://www.wsj.com/articles/if-students-dont-learn-critical-race-theory-why-do-teachers-pacific-educational-group-school-board-administrators-students-class-11662150413
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:No way it magically went away, right...RIGHT???


Of course not. In some cases school systems are doubling down on their commitment to “equity,” which is effectively CRT is practice.

This battle over the future of our schools and nation will play out for years to come - namely, is the goal to provide equal opportunity or to radically redistribute private wealth and societal resources to certain groups (principally ADOS) with the illusory goal of promoting equal outcomes.


No school system is doing that or else you'd hear about it, sweetie. Fox would cover it like a fly on shit. OP meant that there was never any CRT to begin with. You got played, its okay.


DP. Wrong. Of course you are correct that most are not reporting it. Can’t imagine why! Educate yourself.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/schools-teach-crt-critical-race-theory-deny-propaganda-politics-history-11662997649?st=yhgxcp0x873ixxi&reflink=article_copyURL_share

https://www.wsj.com/articles/if-students-dont-learn-critical-race-theory-why-do-teachers-pacific-educational-group-school-board-administrators-students-class-11662150413


You are citing personal opinion pieces from people who are objecting to a high school literature unit using books addressing cultural identity and changing the planned lesson in history class one day to cover important current events. Most people would call that good teaching, but either way, it doesn't support your premise about "equity."


And it's also not CRT.


I'm sorry - what? Seems it is YOU who has no concept of what CRT is. It's even *called* CRT in these training sessions. But do continue to gaslight.

That presentation also spells out the “5 tenets of critical race theory” to “better understand the critical intersection of race and schooling.” One tenet is the “permanence of racism,” or the idea that “racism is endemic to all our institutions, systems and structures” in the U.S. Another is “whiteness as property.” The “critique of liberalism” tenet argues that “colorblindness,” “neutrality of the law” and the “myth of meritocracy” must be “deconstructed.”

These tenets aren’t presented as abstract notions for faculty to consider, but ideas they’re meant to apply. School staff’s ability to use “critical race theory . . . to inform racial equity leadership and analysis of school policies, practices and procedures” is considered a sign of the successful “internalization and application” of Pacific Educational Group’s framework. And a chart includes “Critical Race Theory” as a step toward “Equity/Anti-Racism School Transformation Action Planning.” A Feb. 3, 2021, seminar is even titled “Using Critical Race Theory to Transform Leadership and District.”
post reply Forum Index » Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Message Quick Reply
Go to: