Bad Experience

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ooh. I would not have behaved as you did. You are lucky all they did was that.

Is asking for what you ordered inappropriate? You would pay $45 for an entree you can't ear?

You CAN eat this entree, you are choosing not to because of your preferences, not a life threatening allergy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That gross stuff isn’t going to happen at a high end restaurant. ESP the dip and college mentioned. They might slow roll your replacement though. You’ve now asked for three meals. Next time say you are allergic to cilantro.

Lol, says someone who’s clearly never worked in food service. It can and does, and you’d never know.

And only for PITA customers, PP. A kitchen is too busy to take the time to stop and mess around for fun, unless the customer really did something to deserve it.

DP. Yeah, I worked in food service for years in (and after for awhile) college. This does happen but the frequency at which it happens is WAY overblown. Lol indeed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Surprised by the number of people that would just shut up, accept poor service and pay for it. At least send it back, decline a replacement and refuse to pay for it. Sheeple.

Sheeple or easily influenced by all the people who come rushing into threads to tell gross stories about food service.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ooh. I would not have behaved as you did. You are lucky all they did was that.

Is asking for what you ordered inappropriate? You would pay $45 for an entree you can't ear?

You CAN eat this entree, you are choosing not to because of your preferences, not a life threatening allergy.

https://health.clevelandclinic.org/do-you-love-or-hate-cilantro-the-reason-may-surprise-you/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ooh. I would not have behaved as you did. You are lucky all they did was that.

Is asking for what you ordered inappropriate? You would pay $45 for an entree you can't ear?

You are disagreeing with the restaurant about the level of doneness for the dish. It was certainly edible and met the minimum requirements of doneness to be safely edible.

If your posts are any indication of your general behavior at the restaurant then I can understand the response they gave you. Frankly, they're probably much better off without you as a customer.

[Anonymous]

I really want to know if it was a high-end steakhouse or an Outback-type place.

Did you order it well done and it was rare? It did you order medium rare and it was more medium? I also think if you’re not more flexible maybe restaurants are not the best place. Usually the line cook is more well-versed than a customer on how meat is done. Or if you’re of those people who says “very well done, I don’t want blood,” then don’t go to a high-end place (if this was one).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ooh. I would not have behaved as you did. You are lucky all they did was that.

Is asking for what you ordered inappropriate? You would pay $45 for an entree you can't ear?

You CAN eat this entree, you are choosing not to because of your preferences, not a life threatening allergy.

+1. OP sounds like a drama queen. I would bet good money the steak was cooked properly, OP just likes her steak the texture of cardboard. Should be criminal to cook a nice steak well done.

[Anonymous]

https://www.theonion.com/customer-not-going-to-complain-in-case-he-accidentally-1848918923?utm_campaign=The+Onion&utm_content=1654011004&utm_medium=SocialMarketing&utm_source=facebook&fbclid=IwAR0bK9ftJJ5Xj9P3ds96zQHNgOHHj9wDV0Qs0BuHO9Qded4zsFX788pvLcE