Is this true regarding sex?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I find this to be more true with money than sex. Men who don’t spend on you don’t value you even if they manage to make you feel valued emotionally. Sex is variable. Sometimes a guy will value very much a woman who enjoys sex and has no hang ups about it and wants it with him. If he doesn’t, he has hang ups about sex himself/was taught to view it as dirty/sinful/shameful in some way. Who needs that anyway.

Wtf? This is what we're dealing with gents...

Ok, tell me all about how much you love the woman you refuse to spend money on. I’m sure it’s an epic tale of true love.

This reminds me of a Reddit FDS thread where the woman had been on several nice dates with a guy, and then for the next meetup he’s suggested a lunchtime walk around a park. It was the FDS consensus that this was the sign of a LVM (low value man) and she should cut it off immediately.

What’s FDS.

Apparently it’s Female Dating Strategy, a sub on Reddit. News to me as well.

[Anonymous]

If he’s meeting just to bang- definitely the easy/being used category. Love means not being able to take being apart and even a mundane task is exciting with them in the early year- going to Ho e depot or grocery shopping.

[Anonymous]

A reddit for Female Dating Strategy - crazy women giving crazy dating advice - kind of like a trainwreck - you just have to watch.