Positive stories about pits

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I posted this on the other thread and it looks like it may have been deleted. This is a Harvard paper with a section on pit bulls, media coverage, perceptions, myths, etc. It provides a very clear view of our pit bull vilification and negative media is a form of racism.

https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/37365078/KOMATSU-DOCUMENT-2020.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Please read the negative stories with a critical eye, understanding the reasons why something might be highlighted, how things are portrayed, etc. How and why myths are perpetuated, and so forth. Don’t let the media spoon feed you this click bait.

I’m not saying incidents don’t happen with dogs. They do, with many kinds of dogs. You cannot say of any dog, “it would never bite.” But there is a deeper reason why the negative stories are so pushed and highlighted.


You are so dumb that you pass off a masters thesis by an extension school student as a "Harvard paper". Coincidentally, you are also a pit bull fan.


LOL, I knew DCUM would call out the "extension" part. Some things are so predictable!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I posted this on the other thread and it looks like it may have been deleted. This is a Harvard paper with a section on pit bulls, media coverage, perceptions, myths, etc. It provides a very clear view of our pit bull vilification and negative media is a form of racism.

https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/37365078/KOMATSU-DOCUMENT-2020.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Please read the negative stories with a critical eye, understanding the reasons why something might be highlighted, how things are portrayed, etc. How and why myths are perpetuated, and so forth. Don’t let the media spoon feed you this click bait.

I’m not saying incidents don’t happen with dogs. They do, with many kinds of dogs. You cannot say of any dog, “it would never bite.” But there is a deeper reason why the negative stories are so pushed and highlighted.


You are so dumb that you pass off a masters thesis by an extension school student as a "Harvard paper". Coincidentally, you are also a pit bull fan.


LOL, I knew DCUM would call out the "extension" part. Some things are so predictable!


I mean, even if it wasn't. It's a masters thesis for crying out loud.
Anonymous
We have a pit mix. Have had her since she was 2 months old (and we know where she was from birth). We have trained her well and she is sweet and obedient now at 5 years old. We have two kids and she has been socialized with MANY people over the years.
Anonymous
DH's parents have pits because that's what they have at the shelter. Their last dog, who was a sweetie, bit the UPS man several times. Apparently not badly, didn't maul the man, just bit him. On more than occasion.

How nice.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I posted this on the other thread and it looks like it may have been deleted. This is a Harvard paper with a section on pit bulls, media coverage, perceptions, myths, etc. It provides a very clear view of our pit bull vilification and negative media is a form of racism.

https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/37365078/KOMATSU-DOCUMENT-2020.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Please read the negative stories with a critical eye, understanding the reasons why something might be highlighted, how things are portrayed, etc. How and why myths are perpetuated, and so forth. Don’t let the media spoon feed you this click bait.

I’m not saying incidents don’t happen with dogs. They do, with many kinds of dogs. You cannot say of any dog, “it would never bite.” But there is a deeper reason why the negative stories are so pushed and highlighted.


You are so dumb that you pass off a masters thesis by an extension school student as a "Harvard paper". Coincidentally, you are also a pit bull fan.


Comparing a dog breed to racism is, I think itself racist. Humans aren't conditioned and bred to have specific traits, dogs are. Comparing the two suggests a difference in humans that simple doesn't exist.

Some dog breeds are naturally more aggressive. People are not.


Actually, they were. Just not something we want to discuss as part of our shameful history.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I posted this on the other thread and it looks like it may have been deleted. This is a Harvard paper with a section on pit bulls, media coverage, perceptions, myths, etc. It provides a very clear view of our pit bull vilification and negative media is a form of racism.

https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/37365078/KOMATSU-DOCUMENT-2020.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Please read the negative stories with a critical eye, understanding the reasons why something might be highlighted, how things are portrayed, etc. How and why myths are perpetuated, and so forth. Don’t let the media spoon feed you this click bait.

I’m not saying incidents don’t happen with dogs. They do, with many kinds of dogs. You cannot say of any dog, “it would never bite.” But there is a deeper reason why the negative stories are so pushed and highlighted.


You are so dumb that you pass off a masters thesis by an extension school student as a "Harvard paper". Coincidentally, you are also a pit bull fan.


Comparing a dog breed to racism is, I think itself racist. Humans aren't conditioned and bred to have specific traits, dogs are. Comparing the two suggests a difference in humans that simple doesn't exist.

Some dog breeds are naturally more aggressive. People are not.


Actually, they were. Just not something we want to discuss as part of our shameful history.


Oh okay, so you're going to claim people of certain races are more dangerous but people who dislike certain dog breeds are the real racists?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:DH's parents have pits because that's what they have at the shelter. Their last dog, who was a sweetie, bit the UPS man several times. Apparently not badly, didn't maul the man, just bit him. On more than occasion.

How nice.


My friend's Havanese has bitten their maid and trainer. Twice. Not mauled, but has drawn blood (and need for stitches) two of the four bites. Just thought I'd share. I don't have a pit, but i really don't like irresponsible dog owners in general.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I posted this on the other thread and it looks like it may have been deleted. This is a Harvard paper with a section on pit bulls, media coverage, perceptions, myths, etc. It provides a very clear view of our pit bull vilification and negative media is a form of racism.

https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/37365078/KOMATSU-DOCUMENT-2020.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Please read the negative stories with a critical eye, understanding the reasons why something might be highlighted, how things are portrayed, etc. How and why myths are perpetuated, and so forth. Don’t let the media spoon feed you this click bait.

I’m not saying incidents don’t happen with dogs. They do, with many kinds of dogs. You cannot say of any dog, “it would never bite.” But there is a deeper reason why the negative stories are so pushed and highlighted.


You are so dumb that you pass off a masters thesis by an extension school student as a "Harvard paper". Coincidentally, you are also a pit bull fan.


Comparing a dog breed to racism is, I think itself racist. Humans aren't conditioned and bred to have specific traits, dogs are. Comparing the two suggests a difference in humans that simple doesn't exist.

Some dog breeds are naturally more aggressive. People are not.


Actually, they were. Just not something we want to discuss as part of our shameful history.


Oh okay, so you're going to claim people of certain races are more dangerous but people who dislike certain dog breeds are the real racists?


That's quite the conclusion you jumped to. If I were going to claim anything of the sort (which I am not) I would be inclined to say that whites are most dangerous given what they have done to people over the centuries. But that's not what I said. What I said is that the PP's statement was not actually correct. Humans were "bred" too. That lad is big and works well, so does she, they need to have kids. Get it?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I posted this on the other thread and it looks like it may have been deleted. This is a Harvard paper with a section on pit bulls, media coverage, perceptions, myths, etc. It provides a very clear view of our pit bull vilification and negative media is a form of racism.

https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/37365078/KOMATSU-DOCUMENT-2020.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Please read the negative stories with a critical eye, understanding the reasons why something might be highlighted, how things are portrayed, etc. How and why myths are perpetuated, and so forth. Don’t let the media spoon feed you this click bait.

I’m not saying incidents don’t happen with dogs. They do, with many kinds of dogs. You cannot say of any dog, “it would never bite.” But there is a deeper reason why the negative stories are so pushed and highlighted.


You are so dumb that you pass off a masters thesis by an extension school student as a "Harvard paper". Coincidentally, you are also a pit bull fan.


Comparing a dog breed to racism is, I think itself racist. Humans aren't conditioned and bred to have specific traits, dogs are. Comparing the two suggests a difference in humans that simple doesn't exist.

Some dog breeds are naturally more aggressive. People are not.


Actually, they were. Just not something we want to discuss as part of our shameful history.


Oh okay, so you're going to claim people of certain races are more dangerous but people who dislike certain dog breeds are the real racists?


That's quite the conclusion you jumped to. If I were going to claim anything of the sort (which I am not) I would be inclined to say that whites are most dangerous given what they have done to people over the centuries. But that's not what I said. What I said is that the PP's statement was not actually correct. Humans were "bred" too. That lad is big and works well, so does she, they need to have kids. Get it?


What about the Aztecs and how they killed people? Or the warring tribes in Africa? How about the Mongols? Genghis Khan killed so many people he created an acute ice age due to lack of greenhouse emissions on account of all the people he killed.
Anonymous
It’s irresponsible and very vain to think that you as a pet owner can predict/ train/ overcome inherited pit bull dog traits. Also where do you think these dogs come from? They are part of an underground illegal dog fighting/ junk yard guarding group of animals that have been selectively bred for aggression. They are a large very strong dog. You are not going to change that. Why do you think so many are at shelters that came from “somewhere”. You have no idea what you are getting. As far as having one around my kids my family. No think you. The statistics are frightening to say the least.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I posted this on the other thread and it looks like it may have been deleted. This is a Harvard paper with a section on pit bulls, media coverage, perceptions, myths, etc. It provides a very clear view of our pit bull vilification and negative media is a form of racism.

https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/37365078/KOMATSU-DOCUMENT-2020.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Please read the negative stories with a critical eye, understanding the reasons why something might be highlighted, how things are portrayed, etc. How and why myths are perpetuated, and so forth. Don’t let the media spoon feed you this click bait.

I’m not saying incidents don’t happen with dogs. They do, with many kinds of dogs. You cannot say of any dog, “it would never bite.” But there is a deeper reason why the negative stories are so pushed and highlighted.


You are so dumb that you pass off a masters thesis by an extension school student as a "Harvard paper". Coincidentally, you are also a pit bull fan.


Comparing a dog breed to racism is, I think itself racist. Humans aren't conditioned and bred to have specific traits, dogs are. Comparing the two suggests a difference in humans that simple doesn't exist.

Some dog breeds are naturally more aggressive. People are not.


Actually, they were. Just not something we want to discuss as part of our shameful history.


Oh okay, so you're going to claim people of certain races are more dangerous but people who dislike certain dog breeds are the real racists?


That's quite the conclusion you jumped to. If I were going to claim anything of the sort (which I am not) I would be inclined to say that whites are most dangerous given what they have done to people over the centuries. But that's not what I said. What I said is that the PP's statement was not actually correct. Humans were "bred" too. That lad is big and works well, so does she, they need to have kids. Get it?


Ok you two. I think you're both on the same side of this. Yes, humans have occasionally been bred for differences. But not to nearly the same extent as dogs, with the same effect. Also, humans are humans, and dogs are dogs. Cool?
Anonymous
OP, know that there are other reasonable people out here who don’t damn an entire breed. Many of us have adopted pitties in the DMV or we know people who have adopted pitties.

My 80 year old mom had a pit mix who lived to around 12, he was her constant companion. He followed her around the house, snuggled with her on the sofa, etc. She cried so hard when he died. That dog didn’t do one aggressive thing in the entire time she had him (adopted when he was about a year) and he was nothing but lovely company for her.

At one point my mom had to have surgery and when she came home that dog was glued to her on the bed while she recuperated. He didn’t even want to leave her to go for walks. He was gentle around her as if he knew he had to be.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:We have a pit mix. Have had her since she was 2 months old (and we know where she was from birth). We have trained her well and she is sweet and obedient now at 5 years old. We have two kids and she has been socialized with MANY people over the years.


So have many if the pits and mixes who have mauled kids.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I posted this on the other thread and it looks like it may have been deleted. This is a Harvard paper with a section on pit bulls, media coverage, perceptions, myths, etc. It provides a very clear view of our pit bull vilification and negative media is a form of racism.

https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/37365078/KOMATSU-DOCUMENT-2020.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Please read the negative stories with a critical eye, understanding the reasons why something might be highlighted, how things are portrayed, etc. How and why myths are perpetuated, and so forth. Don’t let the media spoon feed you this click bait.

I’m not saying incidents don’t happen with dogs. They do, with many kinds of dogs. You cannot say of any dog, “it would never bite.” But there is a deeper reason why the negative stories are so pushed and highlighted.


You don’t need a Harvard paper, anyone can look at dog bite and deaths statistics by breed and see the data in black and white. I think it’s racist to compare that data to racism. Please don’t use that term with dogs.
Anonymous
https://youtu.be/7kHNnxL7V8s

And what about this? Pit Bull part of the police K-9 unit. I supposed we’ll hear, “the dog isn’t dead yet, good luck.”
Forum Index » Pets
Go to: