You don't really believe that, right?
|
Still not a safety anywhere. A safety should be a true safety for everyone--for the under 10% chance things go wrong. You just need 1--and you only need to deploy it if RD deadlines roll around and you don't have another acceptance in hand. |
By definition, they aren't safeties for anyone due to low admission rates. |
But what is your statement based on? Is it your gut feeling that privates are so much better? or can you offer some measureable/objectives data that points to privates superioty over public? I dare you to back up your condensending post of "this is not about private vs public but privates are so much better". |
You're high or clueless if you think that BU or Northeastern are safeties for any kid. Or you don't know the meaning of the phrase 'safety school'. Last year BU accepted just over 18% of all applicants (75k+ total). Northeastern accepted just over 20% of the 64k+ applicants. OP's son is a good match for either school, but no guarantees whatsoever. These are targets, not safeties. |
OP here. It's not Sidwell or StA. It's one of the other 3 you identified. He does have Tufts on his list. His college counselor advises that Tufts is definitely not a safety for anyone. Thanks to everyone for all the suggestions. Reading carefully and taking notes! |
You completely misunderstand what a "safety" school actually is. It is mostly about the admissions rate; where you rank in your class at Sidwell is not a factor. |
Good Lord, you are sensitive. The point is--not that privates are better--just that the grading scales at some Top private schools are deflated. no one said that private was better. just that the smartest kids in the class max out at about a 3.9--and grades aren't not weighted. In public there are many kids with a 4.0. then you can weigh up to a 4.7+. I have kids in BOTH public and private High schools. the grading scales are just DIFFERENT. That's the only point. |
| If he likes cities, Temple, Pitt, Drexel, DePaul, Loyola might be closer to true safeties (but apply ASAP!) |
| SMU and Denver |
Especially since Sidwell doesn't rank and never has. |
Oh, well, that does change whether these are safeties. Tufts is a definite reach, and I would say Northeastern may be a target, definitely not a safety. BU may be closer (I think previous poster is confusin BU with BC). |
BU's acceptance rate is in the teens. Both BU and BC are roughly in reach territory, albeit low reach rather than super reach. |
Your absurdly ill-informed. |
GDS is the peer of StA and Sidwell as far as acceptance rates. I agree with others that Brown and Chicago are very, very different schools besides that they're both in cities and about the same size. He needs to look a little deeper into what he wants out of college. Look at the Fiske Guide. Mid-size schools my GDS kid with similar stats was told to look at were William & Mary, Richmond, Miami, Villanova, Lehigh, Rochester, Case, Bucknell, SMU, Santa Clara, GW, American, TCU, Pepperdine |