Meghan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://blindgossip.com/the-calculated-baby/#more-102003

Not surprising. But really makes me sick.

People doing IVF makes you sick? You must be a very delicate flower.

No, it’s not the IVF that makes me sick. At all. It’s the fact that she stands for honesty and transparency, yet keeps this secret, that could also help other women. And the fact that she wrote her miscarriage article while pregnant and/or knowing she had healthy embryos waiting for her at her disposal, while coming off as a woman without the privilege she does.

How any female conceives is not your business..and the fact that they announced they are expecting does not make it your business! What next, im the interest of transparency and honesty you want to see her ovulation chart? You want to know how often she had sex with her husband? You are ridiculous!

DP

I think it’s fair to call out celebrities who pretend it was easy to conceive despite AMA when the reality is they’re using eggs frozen years ago.

If she wants to be authentic, why not share? Why not encourage other women to do the same?

That’s the criticism. It’s legit since so many women were fed a lie that it’s easy to get pregnant in your 40s with your own eggs and no medical intervention. Celebrities fed us that lie.

Which celebrity fed you the lie that it’s easy to get pregnant in your 40s?

Nicole Kidman
JLo
All of the ones who had babies in their 40s

Kidman has admitted infertility problems. When she was with Cruz she said she had issues which led her to adopting. By the time she married Urban, technolgy had advanced which allowed her to give birth. She used a surrogate for her fourth child.

JLO said he did not know she could get pregnant, but once off the BC she conceived naturally. I know three women with this same experience. One had secondary infertility. The other had two more children, with the last at age 43. All without infertility. The third one was 42 with her first chid and did not realize she was pregnant. She thought she was going through early menopause.

Nobody fed you a lie. Your ignorance is your own.

True. I think/hope(?) women have a basic understanding of why it’s generally difficult to get pregnant later in life.

[Anonymous]

Is this now the TTC forum? Who cares about how Meghan came about her pregnancies?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://blindgossip.com/the-calculated-baby/#more-102003

Not surprising. But really makes me sick.

People doing IVF makes you sick? You must be a very delicate flower.

No, it’s not the IVF that makes me sick. At all. It’s the fact that she stands for honesty and transparency, yet keeps this secret, that could also help other women. And the fact that she wrote her miscarriage article while pregnant and/or knowing she had healthy embryos waiting for her at her disposal, while coming off as a woman without the privilege she does.

How any female conceives is not your business..and the fact that they announced they are expecting does not make it your business! What next, im the interest of transparency and honesty you want to see her ovulation chart? You want to know how often she had sex with her husband? You are ridiculous!

DP

I think it’s fair to call out celebrities who pretend it was easy to conceive despite AMA when the reality is they’re using eggs frozen years ago.

If she wants to be authentic, why not share? Why not encourage other women to do the same?

That’s the criticism. It’s legit since so many women were fed a lie that it’s easy to get pregnant in your 40s with your own eggs and no medical intervention. Celebrities fed us that lie.

Which celebrity fed you the lie that it’s easy to get pregnant in your 40s?

Nicole Kidman
JLo
All of the ones who had babies in their 40s

Kidman has admitted infertility problems. When she was with Cruz she said she had issues which led her to adopting. By the time she married Urban, technolgy had advanced which allowed her to give birth. She used a surrogate for her fourth child.

JLO said he did not know she could get pregnant, but once off the BC she conceived naturally. I know three women with this same experience. One had secondary infertility. The other had two more children, with the last at age 43. All without infertility. The third one was 42 with her first chid and did not realize she was pregnant. She thought she was going through early menopause.

Nobody fed you a lie. Your ignorance is your own.

True. I think/hope(?) women have a basic understanding of why it’s generally difficult to get pregnant later in life.

Late 30s is not 'later in life'. Not with current medical advancements. There's a push to actually move the 'geriatric' designation to early-40s now.

"...one of the largest studies found that 78 percent of women aged 35 to 40 will conceive within a year, compared with 84 percent of women aged 20 to 34."

https://slate.com/technology/2020/08/fertility-cliff-advanced-maternal-age-outdated.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Is this now the TTC forum? Who cares about how Meghan came about her pregnancies?

The people who insisted she was barren when marrying at the age of 36.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Is this now the TTC forum? Who cares about how Meghan came about her pregnancies?

I know, right??!! I dislike her but like for reasons having nothing to do with how she had her babies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Didn't get a change to respond to the other thread.

Team Meghan.

I have disdain for old archaic institutions that do absolutely nothing but provide weird antiquated symbolism. F the whole "royal" grifter charade.

Do nothing? You obviously don't know your English history. I would be team Queen just based on her World War II heroics. And if the question was team Harry or the Queen it would always be THE QUEEN!

I love my grandmother and think she was a total bad a and lived a pretty amazing life. Doesn’t mean she wasn’t also judge mental and mean, particularly to family members she disapproved of for reasons both rational and irrational.

Personally to me this has shown me that for the Queen love is conditional. She’s an amazing queen but has long seemed like a sub par mother and grandmother. People can be more than one thing at the same time

+1

She destroys/tries to destroy everyone who disagrees with her. Her sister. Prince Charles (her fault he married Diana), and now she tried it with Harry/Meghan. Also the kid she was closest to/most involved in rearing was Andrew...and he’s the worst one of the bunch!

QEII was miserable in her marriage and accepted the very least from Philipp. As a result, she believed that no one else deserved or was entitled to a happy marriage. Misery has no sympathy and enjoys company.

Victoria was the same way with her children. Having favorites, not having a good relationship with her heir, and even trying to prevent her last daughter from marrying in order to keep her around as her personal attendant.

But there is also the fact that she really seemed to fall in love with Phillip and was a fierce advocate to marry him. Victoria had the same sort of beginning with Albert. But he didn't live long enough to cheat on her for decades, so I don't know.

Elizabeth fell in love with Philipp, but Philipp did not fall in love with her. He was poor, broke, a nazi outcast who happened to have a powerful uncle/godfather named Montbatten. Philipp did not have a lot of options. Montbatten encouraged Philipp to woo Elizabeth the heir to the throne. It was easy to influence a naive 13-year old when you are a tall, handsome nineteen-year old. It was the best payoff in Philipp's life. He got the future queen and all the toys and mistresses life allowed him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is this now the TTC forum? Who cares about how Meghan came about her pregnancies?

The people who insisted she was barren when marrying at the age of 36.

I mean...she was. She was only able to get pregnant with world class doctors. What do you call a poor women who can not afford IVF -- or even a rich royal 30 years ago with the same issues? Barren.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is this now the TTC forum? Who cares about how Meghan came about her pregnancies?

The people who insisted she was barren when marrying at the age of 36.

I mean...she was. She was only able to get pregnant with world class doctors. What do you call poor women who can not afford IVF -- or even a rich royal 30 years ago -- with the same issues? Barren.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is this now the TTC forum? Who cares about how Meghan came about her pregnancies?

The people who insisted she was barren when marrying at the age of 36.

I mean...she was. She was only able to get pregnant with world class doctors. What do you call poor women who can not afford IVF -- or even a rich royal 30 years ago -- with the same issues? Barren.

30 years ago is not 2021. And 3 pregnancies in 3 years is called fecund, dear.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is this now the TTC forum? Who cares about how Meghan came about her pregnancies?

The people who insisted she was barren when marrying at the age of 36.

I mean...she was. She was only able to get pregnant with world class doctors. What do you call poor women who can not afford IVF -- or even a rich royal 30 years ago -- with the same issues? Barren.

How do you know that? Are you her doctor? And even if she did is it now a federal crime to avail yourself of the best medical care you can afford?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is this now the TTC forum? Who cares about how Meghan came about her pregnancies?

The people who insisted she was barren when marrying at the age of 36.

I mean...she was. She was only able to get pregnant with world class doctors. What do you call poor women who can not afford IVF -- or even a rich royal 30 years ago -- with the same issues? Barren.

It's a pity that you are so miserable and jealous due to your own inability to conceive with or without assistance. So unbecoming.

[Anonymous]

Whether or not Meghan conceived naturally or not, who cares...but she does seem to hyper-control everything in her life. It’s so annoying.

[Anonymous]

https://people.com/royals/prince-william-upset-prince-harry-pushed-back-queen-elizabeth-announcement-report/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://people.com/royals/prince-william-upset-prince-harry-pushed-back-queen-elizabeth-announcement-report/

Probably planted by the Markle camp.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is this now the TTC forum? Who cares about how Meghan came about her pregnancies?

The people who insisted she was barren when marrying at the age of 36.

I mean...she was. She was only able to get pregnant with world class doctors. What do you call poor women who can not afford IVF -- or even a rich royal 30 years ago -- with the same issues? Barren.

I mean... back to my original point-- who cares? She had a baby which seems to concretely disprove your point. Furthermore, if they didn't have babies at all, that's an okay thing too. People's fertility issues aren't a character indictment.