Fire in upper NW?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Amidst the arguing over the meaning randomn and who is or isn't a racist, I don't think we're making a big enough deal over the apparent fact that uneaten pizza crust provided the break in the case.

Considering the fire, the smoke, etc. that DNA turned up on a piece of pizza is mind-boggling.

I recall quite a few "holy craps" over that

[Anonymous]

Where's the cash I wonder?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:WTOP reports that DC police think the suspect fled to Brooklyn, and that NYPD is looking for him. I hope that NYPD takes this animal down. He deserves to be put in the mother of all chokeholds. What. else can you say about someone who tortures a little boy and then sets the boy on fire? If they try him in DC he will probably only be convicted of something like manslaughter. DC courts are a joke. Look what happened yesterday with "Marion" Christopher Barry. He basically knocked over a bank, destroyed property and threatened and assaulted a bank clerk. And despite having a criminal record, he only got a few months probation! What do you think would happen to someone who tried that outside DC?

yes, you are right. he should get the death penalty. but judging by some of these comments I am sure some think they would be too "cruel".

There is no death penalty in DC. I would be satisfied with life with no parole, but there is the "who am I to judge?" attitude of DC juries to contend with. All you need is some defense bar scumbag asking why the police put a full court press on solving this crime at the expense of SE DC, and you might even get a juror to vote for nullification.

If there is a federal prosecution, the death penalty could be a possibility. Kidnapping or arson resulting in death are capital crimes.

there is basically a moratorium on carrying out of fed death penalty right now

[Anonymous]

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/may/21/dc-murder-suspect-daron-wint-threatened-own-family/

The father of Daron Wint, the man suspected of killing a Northwest D.C. couple, their young son, and their housekeeper, had been so frightened by threats his son made to shoot his own family that he sought a protective order barring the man from contacting them for a year.

Maryland court records show that over the last decade Mr. Wint has been the subject of numerous peace and protective orders.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don't know...I still think all of it was too much for one person to pull off. And when they get this guy in custody I hope he sings like a canary.

Doubt he will go down without a fight. I really hope they can bring him in alive.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Amidst the arguing over the meaning randomn and who is or isn't a racist, I don't think we're making a big enough deal over the apparent fact that uneaten pizza crust provided the break in the case.

Considering the fire, the smoke, etc. that DNA turned up on a piece of pizza is mind-boggling.

And if they had had a dog, the pizza crust would not be there, and the crime would be unsolved.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think there's more that we will find out. There had to be at least one accomplice. How would he recognize the man knocking on the door in the morning as the housekeepers husband? They seemed to react pretty quickly by having Savvas call him before he even got around to the side of the house. If everyone was tied up, his accomplice must have known who that was.

Hmmm. This is an interesting point.

There may well have been someone else--I was really hoping that would have been asked at the press conference--but I don't think the above provides anything to indicate that there was or wasn't an accomplice.

There's a knock on the door. Wint has the husband look out a peephole or identify a car parked outside or anything else. There's no reason why that would take long at all and could easily be done in the time that someone would wait at the front door before walking around the house.

[Anonymous]

Jesus, his own father took a restraining order out against him?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Amidst the arguing over the meaning randomn and who is or isn't a racist, I don't think we're making a big enough deal over the apparent fact that uneaten pizza crust provided the break in the case.

Considering the fire, the smoke, etc. that DNA turned up on a piece of pizza is mind-boggling.

And if they had had a dog, the pizza crust would not be there, and the crime would be unsolved.

The dogs were put in the back yard. Try to keep up. It is still a mystery why they were not making noise.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Amidst the arguing over the meaning randomn and who is or isn't a racist, I don't think we're making a big enough deal over the apparent fact that uneaten pizza crust provided the break in the case.

Considering the fire, the smoke, etc. that DNA turned up on a piece of pizza is mind-boggling.

Not really, because the guy had a huge rap sheet and wasn't being put away from society.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think there's more that we will find out. There had to be at least one accomplice. How would he recognize the man knocking on the door in the morning as the housekeepers husband? They seemed to react pretty quickly by having Savvas call him before he even got around to the side of the house. If everyone was tied up, his accomplice must have known who that was.

Hmmm. This is an interesting point.

There may well have been someone else--I was really hoping that would have been asked at the press conference--but I don't think the above provides anything to indicate that there was or wasn't an accomplice.

There's a knock on the door. Wint has the husband look out a peephole or identify a car parked outside or anything else. There's no reason why that would take long at all and could easily be done in the time that someone would wait at the front door before walking around the house.

It was asked at the press conference and the Cheif didn't say either or.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think there's more that we will find out. There had to be at least one accomplice. How would he recognize the man knocking on the door in the morning as the housekeepers husband? They seemed to react pretty quickly by having Savvas call him before he even got around to the side of the house. If everyone was tied up, his accomplice must have known who that was.

You really want it still to have been the maid don't you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Amidst the arguing over the meaning randomn and who is or isn't a racist, I don't think we're making a big enough deal over the apparent fact that uneaten pizza crust provided the break in the case.

Considering the fire, the smoke, etc. that DNA turned up on a piece of pizza is mind-boggling.

Not really, because the guy had a huge rap sheet and wasn't being put away from society.

I think you missed the point about the pizza crust. How did it survive intact?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Amidst the arguing over the meaning randomn and who is or isn't a racist, I don't think we're making a big enough deal over the apparent fact that uneaten pizza crust provided the break in the case.

Considering the fire, the smoke, etc. that DNA turned up on a piece of pizza is mind-boggling.

I recall quite a few "holy craps" over that

I would suspect that would of been one of the first things they tested because that was a guaranteed something that he had in his possession with possible dna at the house. I also thought that they would also test the box of envelopes since he used one to put the money in.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Amidst the arguing over the meaning randomn and who is or isn't a racist, I don't think we're making a big enough deal over the apparent fact that uneaten pizza crust provided the break in the case.

Considering the fire, the smoke, etc. that DNA turned up on a piece of pizza is mind-boggling.

Not really, because the guy had a huge rap sheet and wasn't being put away from society.

I think you missed the point about the pizza crust. How did it survive intact?

I think the initial report said the 2nd and 3rd floors where in flames. Maybe the pizza was on the first floor.