Public Trump Impeachment Hearing Mega Thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Turley: if you can prove quid pro quo, you might have an impeachable offense.

Cue Mulvaney and Sondland admitting a Quid Pro Quo.

Are we done now?

This is exact BS that saved Trump's butt in Mueller investigation - Trump hides evidence, DOJ becomes Trump's personal defense attorney, investigators brings circumstantial evidences and GOP says we do not see a QPQ contact with Trump's signature, so it is not a crime. I am so tired of the BS gas-lighting.

I think USA should be split.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I love Professor Feldman but he totally looks like a WWI poet today.

Which means he looks absolutely awesome!

are you the two with a bow-tie Brit fetish?

Not judging, just curious.

I'm getting Benedict Cumberbatch vibes.

I’m reminded of Julian Sands in Room with a View.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Turley is educating the FOX shows viewers.

The other three are simply advancing a narrative of "their side." Speaking as if presumptions are facts.

One thing is for sure - both Feldman and Karlan have dramatically lowered my opinion of law school professors. Arrogant and presenting themselves as if they are the only ones who are right - anyone who disagrees with them are stupid.

If I were taking a constitutional law school course, Turley would be my choice of professors. Smart, balanced, and good sense of humor.

FTFY.

He is employed for life now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Turley is educating the FOX shows viewers.

The other three are simply advancing a narrative of "their side." Speaking as if presumptions are facts.

One thing is for sure - both Feldman and Karlan have dramatically lowered my opinion of law school professors. Arrogant and presenting themselves as if they are the only ones who are right - anyone who disagrees with them are stupid.

If I were taking a constitutional law school course, Turley would be my choice of professors. Smart, balanced, and good sense of humor.

FTFY.

He is employed for life now.

You know he appears on other networks?
He KNOWS the Constitution.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Turley is educating the American people.

The other three are simply advancing a narrative of "their side." Speaking as if presumptions are facts.

One thing is for sure - both Feldman and Karlan have dramatically lowered my opinion of law school professors. Arrogant and presenting themselves as if they are the only ones who are right - anyone who disagrees with them are stupid.

If I were taking a constitutional law school course, Turley would be my choice of professors. Smart, balanced, and good sense of humor.

Turley is auditioning for a job at Fox News. The other three professors were articulate and straightforward. None displayed arrogance. They presented themselves as if they were right because they are right, you tool. Something tells me that you don’t have to worry about your choice of law professors.

[Anonymous]

Turley completely undercut what he wrote in 2014

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/five-myths-about-impeachment/2014/08/01/1f00f4ea-1808-11e4-9e3b-7f2f110c6265_story.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Turley is educating the FOX shows viewers.

The other three are simply advancing a narrative of "their side." Speaking as if presumptions are facts.

One thing is for sure - both Feldman and Karlan have dramatically lowered my opinion of law school professors. Arrogant and presenting themselves as if they are the only ones who are right - anyone who disagrees with them are stupid.

If I were taking a constitutional law school course, Turley would be my choice of professors. Smart, balanced, and good sense of humor.

FTFY.

He is employed for life now.

You know he appears on other networks?
He KNOWS the Constitution.

So why is he bs-ing so much at this hearing?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Turley: if you can prove quid pro quo, you might have an impeachable offense.

Cue Mulvaney and Sondland admitting a Quid Pro Quo.

Are we done now?

This is exact BS that saved Trump's butt in Mueller investigation - Trump hides evidence, DOJ becomes Trump's personal defense attorney, investigators brings circumstantial evidences and GOP says we do not see a QPQ contact with Trump's signature, so it is not a crime. I am so tired of the BS gas-lighting.

I think USA should be split.

Me too. Won’t happen bc the blue states support the red ones.

[Anonymous]

Rep. Sensenbrenner says the GOP didn’t investigate Biden over Ukraine when he was VP and they were majority, instead focused on doing work of country.

The reality is that Biden, as many have testified, carried out U.S. policy in Ukraine. And, the GOP formed select Benghazi probe with an eye on Clinton as nominee. Meanwhile, the House has passed hundreds of bills on behalf of the American public that languish in the Senate.

[Anonymous]

There would be a mass exodus to blue states.

[Anonymous]

Judge Nepolitano disagrees with Turley

https://twitter.com/JesseCharlesLee/status/1202302861637496833

Fox News' Judge Napolitano crushes Turley: "The House has sole power of impeachment. It does not need to go to a court... When the president receives a subpoena, Mick Mulvaney, Mike Pompeo receive a subpoena and they throw it in a drawer... that is the act of obstruction."

[Anonymous]

This was the best line:

"The President can name his son Barron but not make him a baron."

https://twitter.com/KlasfeldReports/status/1202315327889125377

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Turley is educating the FOX shows viewers.

The other three are simply advancing a narrative of "their side." Speaking as if presumptions are facts.

One thing is for sure - both Feldman and Karlan have dramatically lowered my opinion of law school professors. Arrogant and presenting themselves as if they are the only ones who are right - anyone who disagrees with them are stupid.

If I were taking a constitutional law school course, Turley would be my choice of professors. Smart, balanced, and good sense of humor.

FTFY.

He is employed for life now.

You know he appears on other networks?
He KNOWS the Constitution.

He is a trump schill and no better than then piles of $&it GOP defending Trump

[Anonymous]

Still not hearing anyone defending what the President did.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Judge Nepolitano disagrees with Turley

https://twitter.com/JesseCharlesLee/status/1202302861637496833

Fox News' Judge Napolitano crushes Turley: "The House has sole power of impeachment. It does not need to go to a court... When the president receives a subpoena, Mick Mulvaney, Mike Pompeo receive a subpoena and they throw it in a drawer... that is the act of obstruction."

What remedies does Congress have for citizens who refuse to respond to subpoenas?