Sean “Diddy” Combs accused of gang rape of teen girl in new lawsuit

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Diddy's team is going to flood the internet this weekend with a bunch of BS. They know the chances of the jurors coming across this stuff either by watching TV or scrolling social media are extremely high.

Oh brother. Is that jury tampering at this stage?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:AUSA Comey: He coerced Cassie and Jane in to this - and nothing happened. He raped Mia - and nothing happened. He beat Cassie and nothing happened. He beat Cassie in hotel on tape, then bribed the guards to buy it - and nothing happened. He was untouchable
He did not think these woman would speak - and that Kid Cudi and Deonte Nash and other men would back them up. The defendant is not a God. He stands equal before the law. Find him guilty.

And that was how the prosecution finished up their rebuttal. The jurors have been released. I predict a verdict by Wednesday/Thursday.

How many women are on the jury?

8 men 4 women

[Anonymous]

Hmm

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How much does an overcharged prosecution case like this cost the taxpayers?

Are govt criminal prosecutors paid like $200-300k a year total and private defense attorneys make $1000/hour and over $1m a year income?

Is there a big chasm between the talent on each side here? I mean if I was a super smart, driven, analytical, persuasive attorney why would I stay in the public sector? (Unless trust fund or high income spouse, and even then, I’m probably naturally competitive so…)

Govt prosecutors make far less than that.

10+ years out of law school govt prosecutors make less than $200-300k a year!!?!

Maybe they got their law school paid for.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:AUSA Comey: He coerced Cassie and Jane in to this - and nothing happened. He raped Mia - and nothing happened. He beat Cassie and nothing happened. He beat Cassie in hotel on tape, then bribed the guards to buy it - and nothing happened. He was untouchable
He did not think these woman would speak - and that Kid Cudi and Deonte Nash and other men would back them up. The defendant is not a God. He stands equal before the law. Find him guilty.

And that was how the prosecution finished up their rebuttal. The jurors have been released. I predict a verdict by Wednesday/Thursday.

How many women are on the jury?

8 men 4 women

Not bad odds.

[Anonymous]

I would not convict him. I am white and a woman. I do not think the case was proven. I feel the case was too much about domestic abuse but that is not the charge. I would
convict on that charge if it was a charge. i do not think he was running a criminal operation. He is an abusive guy with sex habits that I have heard of meaning the swinging stuff. It is a strange life but clearly some people like that which is why there are actual sex clubs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I would not convict him. I am white and a woman. I do not think the case was proven. I feel the case was too much about domestic abuse but that is not the charge. I would
convict on that charge if it was a charge. i do not think he was running a criminal operation. He is an abusive guy with sex habits that I have heard of meaning the swinging stuff. It is a strange life but clearly some people like that which is why there are actual sex clubs.

But he didn’t go to a sex club he ran his own…sex business. Money changed hands. That’s a fact. He controlled women and men with abusive tactics. That’s a fact. What else is needed to prove criminal intent?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How much does an overcharged prosecution case like this cost the taxpayers?

Are govt criminal prosecutors paid like $200-300k a year total and private defense attorneys make $1000/hour and over $1m a year income?

Is there a big chasm between the talent on each side here? I mean if I was a super smart, driven, analytical, persuasive attorney why would I stay in the public sector? (Unless trust fund or high income spouse, and even then, I’m probably naturally competitive so…)

Govt prosecutors make far less than that.

10+ years out of law school govt prosecutors make less than $200-300k a year!!?!

Yes, prosecutors are federal employees and they all make less than $300K per year. Many/most (?) make less than $200K per year.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would not convict him. I am white and a woman. I do not think the case was proven. I feel the case was too much about domestic abuse but that is not the charge. I would
convict on that charge if it was a charge. i do not think he was running a criminal operation. He is an abusive guy with sex habits that I have heard of meaning the swinging stuff. It is a strange life but clearly some people like that which is why there are actual sex clubs.

But he didn’t go to a sex club he ran his own…sex business. Money changed hands. That’s a fact. He controlled women and men with abusive tactics. That’s a fact. What else is needed to prove criminal intent?

A brothel but run by a man

[Anonymous]

Does anyone know if Nintendo is going to rename one of their characters "Diddy Kong" following the accusations of Diddy himself?

[Anonymous]

Heidi Fleiss was sentenced to 7 years but only served 20 months plus 370 hours of community service.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would not convict him. I am white and a woman. I do not think the case was proven. I feel the case was too much about domestic abuse but that is not the charge. I would
convict on that charge if it was a charge. i do not think he was running a criminal operation. He is an abusive guy with sex habits that I have heard of meaning the swinging stuff. It is a strange life but clearly some people like that which is why there are actual sex clubs.

But he didn’t go to a sex club he ran his own…sex business. Money changed hands. That’s a fact. He controlled women and men with abusive tactics. That’s a fact. What else is needed to prove criminal intent?

No he was having freak offs for fun and with people who were into it. He wasn’t making money. A brothel makes money. Again he is a troubled guy and an abuser but the freak offs were just a weird fetish. The irony is his defense probably would have looked at me and bounced me from the jury but I would look at charges and not if I personally liked or hated the guy. It is clear they are trying to make people convict him over his abuse to his girlfriend and that is not the charge. She also went along it seemed happily with the freaky stuff so I can’t even say she was forced. The reality is there are a lot of people into this crazy lifestyle. I cannot imagine it being fun but whatever. Hope if he get off he works on himself and gets some help.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would not convict him. I am white and a woman. I do not think the case was proven. I feel the case was too much about domestic abuse but that is not the charge. I would
convict on that charge if it was a charge. i do not think he was running a criminal operation. He is an abusive guy with sex habits that I have heard of meaning the swinging stuff. It is a strange life but clearly some people like that which is why there are actual sex clubs.

But he didn’t go to a sex club he ran his own…sex business. Money changed hands. That’s a fact. He controlled women and men with abusive tactics. That’s a fact. What else is needed to prove criminal intent?

No he was having freak offs for fun and with people who were into it. He wasn’t making money. A brothel makes money. Again he is a troubled guy and an abuser but the freak offs were just a weird fetish. The irony is his defense probably would have looked at me and bounced me from the jury but I would look at charges and not if I personally liked or hated the guy. It is clear they are trying to make people convict him over his abuse to his girlfriend and that is not the charge. She also went along it seemed happily with the freaky stuff so I can’t even say she was forced. The reality is there are a lot of people into this crazy lifestyle. I cannot imagine it being fun but whatever. Hope if he get off he works on himself and gets some help.

Which charge includes profit-motive as an element of the crime?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would not convict him. I am white and a woman. I do not think the case was proven. I feel the case was too much about domestic abuse but that is not the charge. I would
convict on that charge if it was a charge. i do not think he was running a criminal operation. He is an abusive guy with sex habits that I have heard of meaning the swinging stuff. It is a strange life but clearly some people like that which is why there are actual sex clubs.

But he didn’t go to a sex club he ran his own…sex business. Money changed hands. That’s a fact. He controlled women and men with abusive tactics. That’s a fact. What else is needed to prove criminal intent?

No he was having freak offs for fun and with people who were into it. He wasn’t making money. A brothel makes money. Again he is a troubled guy and an abuser but the freak offs were just a weird fetish. The irony is his defense probably would have looked at me and bounced me from the jury but I would look at charges and not if I personally liked or hated the guy. It is clear they are trying to make people convict him over his abuse to his girlfriend and that is not the charge. She also went along it seemed happily with the freaky stuff so I can’t even say she was forced. The reality is there are a lot of people into this crazy lifestyle. I cannot imagine it being fun but whatever. Hope if he get off he works on himself and gets some help.

It is fascinating your take away is these women were enjoying it.

I think this is the main block for people with this case. People just cannot grasp how these women, if they are not physically constrained, wouldn’t get away from him. So therefore they are enjoying it and not being forced. I don’t agree with this. But seems to me it’s a near zero chance some of the jurors don’t think this way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would not convict him. I am white and a woman. I do not think the case was proven. I feel the case was too much about domestic abuse but that is not the charge. I would
convict on that charge if it was a charge. i do not think he was running a criminal operation. He is an abusive guy with sex habits that I have heard of meaning the swinging stuff. It is a strange life but clearly some people like that which is why there are actual sex clubs.

But he didn’t go to a sex club he ran his own…sex business. Money changed hands. That’s a fact. He controlled women and men with abusive tactics. That’s a fact. What else is needed to prove criminal intent?

No he was having freak offs for fun and with people who were into it. He wasn’t making money. A brothel makes money. Again he is a troubled guy and an abuser but the freak offs were just a weird fetish. The irony is his defense probably would have looked at me and bounced me from the jury but I would look at charges and not if I personally liked or hated the guy. It is clear they are trying to make people convict him over his abuse to his girlfriend and that is not the charge. She also went along it seemed happily with the freaky stuff so I can’t even say she was forced. The reality is there are a lot of people into this crazy lifestyle. I cannot imagine it being fun but whatever. Hope if he get off he works on himself and gets some help.

Who was into it? The men he paid or the women he physically and emotionally abused and threatened in order to get them to be there?