
I wasn't there, and I don't know the people who were there, and I don't know the location or the year you were there, and I don't know what you were doing; but I believe you anyway just cuz I believe you. ![]() |
What’s partisan about that? GOPers are always saying that Trump has nothing to do with the GOP, he’s just there. Also, what’s not factually correct about RBG’s statement? He is a faker. He is completely inconsistent. He does say whatever pops into his head. He has a horrible ego problem. And no one has seen his taxes. Pointing out that Trump is a charlatan harlot is not the same thing as claiming that the Clintons and the liberals are out to get you. |
I noticed Brett Kavanaugh yesterday with fake tears. I'm going to ask him who is his acting coach. |
You don’t know your friends’ characters? You wouldn’t know which one to trust? You wouldn’t know who’s a bit of a fabulist and how isn’t? |
If both parties speak with passion and clarity, but one of them says many inconsistent, evasive, irrational, and false things, while the other does not, then we actually have a very good indicator of which party is telling the truth. |
But you'll take her partying side over his partying side. Correct? |
Already discussed. He had no connections to Yale Law School. His grandfather went to Yale undergrad, so a small connection for undergrad, but it wouldn't have counted for anything for Yale Law School. |
Sure he had the right to be angry. He did not have the “right” to act like an unhinged partisan hack. That was his choice - not a right. The fact that his temper flared and he acted like a jerk to Senators shows that he can’t appropriately communicate under pressure. Totally unbecoming of a SCJ. And RBG stating that Trump is inconsistent is her stating the facts; the man lies and even his supporters admit this. It’s also not the same as drumming up conspiracy theories and threatening your political opposition with retaliation. That crossed a line that even many conservatives I know are deeply troubled by. Not the same at all. |
When you're talking about accusations like rape and murder, I think it should take more than "I believe my friend." |
Let’s consider the situation. 4 boys. 2 girls. One girl claims she was sexually assaulted while 2 boys and another girls were downstairs. The two boys who allegedly assaulted her go downstairs and join the other 2 boys and 1 girl. That is 4 boys and 1 girl downstairs. Ford claims she left at that point. Seemingly, leaving her friend with these other 4 boys. Several questions come to mind.... 1. Evidently, Ford was not at all considered about the safety of her friend with the 4 boys, despite the fact that she was allegedly assaulted. You don’t find that strange? You don’t find it odd that she never asked her friend what happened after she left? 2. Leland was allegedly in the room with 4 boys, one of which was allegedly Kavanaugh, yet she claims not to know him. Seriously? A small gathering such as this and she still claims she doesn’t know him? 3. Ford leaves, not knowing how she got home. Does her friend not wonder why she left? Wouldn’t a friend follow up and ask her about it? It makes no sense...... |
Can everyone supporting Kavanaugh tell us why you are overlooking his obvious lies under oath? Putting all the allegations aside and just looking at the yearbook definitions he gave and is clearly lying about - how do you rationalize that? I really want to hear from someone. |
I have no idea whether someone from Feiny’s office leaked it but no way, no how is anyone ever going to admit if they did. |
Bill Shine. |
+100 |
In 1985, that is not true. Today, true. |