Public Trump Impeachment Hearing Mega Thread

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I love Professor Feldman but he totally looks like a WWI poet today.

Feldmans a kook. His appearing today will hurt his marketability for any future meaningful political work.


He’s a chaired professor at Harvard so I think he’ll be OK. It doesn’t appear that he does almost any “political work,” unlike Turley who never met a camera he didn’t run to.
Anonymous
Turley is saying there has to be a provable federal crime in court, while Barr saying a president cannot be investigated for a crime.

This is the core problem with the thinking by the Trump defenders. There is no path to accountability. One or the other or both, but not neither.
Anonymous
Turley wrote about Ukraine and Biden in February. He is basically a fact witness to the propaganda and should not be testifying.
Anonymous
This argument that if the Republicans aren't agreeing with the impeachment that this is partisan and, therefore, illegitimate is nonsense. The partisanship is on the part of the Republicans by refusing to acknowledge the facts in front of their faces. All these attempts to distract and defend this POTUS are the partisanship that is dismantling the fabric of this country.
Anonymous
Jonathan Turley is friends with Bill Barr. The impeachment inquiry and the original whistleblower's report directly implicates Barr in trying to cover up Trump's behavior towards Ukraine.
Anonymous
Wow, the GOP counsel can’t pronounce “nepotism.”
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Turley is saying there has to be a provable federal crime in court, while Barr saying a president cannot be investigated for a crime.

This is the core problem with the thinking by the Trump defenders. There is no path to accountability. One or the other or both, but not neither.


Meanwhile

https://twitter.com/CharlesPPierce/status/1202266251478917120

Here’s Turley in 1998. Impeaching Clinton for a blowjob was necessary to fend off “anarchy."


https://jonathanturley.org/2007/08/20/clinton-impeachment-testimony-house-judiciary-committee/
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:This argument that if the Republicans aren't agreeing with the impeachment that this is partisan and, therefore, illegitimate is nonsense. The partisanship is on the part of the Republicans by refusing to acknowledge the facts in front of their faces. All these attempts to distract and defend this POTUS are the partisanship that is dismantling the fabric of this country.


Okay. Run on that in Red States. Please.
Anonymous
Turley never struck me as sleazy until now. I wonder if he will get blowback at GW.

He is entitled to his legal opinions but he just trafficked in right wing conspiracies about Biden and Ukraine.

LovecFeldman.
Anonymous
Turley never struck me as sleazy until now. I wonder if he will get blowback at GW.

He is entitled to his legal opinions but he just trafficked in right wing conspiracies about Biden and Ukraine.

LovecFeldman.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Wow, the GOP counsel can’t pronounce “nepotism.”


Not surprising.
Anonymous
Crazy times when the GOP poo poos originality. Is that the bedrock of their love for the 2A and religious "freedom" and opposition to abortion, etc.
Anonymous
Wow, Collins sounds hysterical and stupid at the same time.
Anonymous
Now Turley is your target because he disagrees with the expediency and the sloppy nature of this sh*tshow? Ha!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Turley is saying there has to be a provable federal crime in court, while Barr saying a president cannot be investigated for a crime.

This is the core problem with the thinking by the Trump defenders. There is no path to accountability. One or the other or both, but not neither.


Meanwhile

https://twitter.com/CharlesPPierce/status/1202266251478917120

Here’s Turley in 1998. Impeaching Clinton for a blowjob was necessary to fend off “anarchy."


https://jonathanturley.org/2007/08/20/clinton-impeachment-testimony-house-judiciary-committee/


That tells you all you need to know right there. Turkey appears to be a hack of the first order..
Forum Index » Political Discussion
Go to: