Physicians Assistant yelling “HELP ME” while stealing a CitiBike ?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:His family has started a GoFundMe.

https://www.gofundme.com/f/the-family-of-the-young-man-in-citi-bike-incident?member=27119691&sharetype=teams&utm_campaign=p_na+share-sheet&utm_medium=copy_link&utm_source=customer

So now they claim a pregnant nurse “assaulted “ him. Lol

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:His family has started a GoFundMe.

https://www.gofundme.com/f/the-family-of-the-young-man-in-citi-bike-incident?member=27119691&sharetype=teams&utm_campaign=p_na+share-sheet&utm_medium=copy_link&utm_source=customer

Of course.

Omg people are actually donating to this grift.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:His family has started a GoFundMe.

https://www.gofundme.com/f/the-family-of-the-young-man-in-citi-bike-incident?member=27119691&sharetype=teams&utm_campaign=p_na+share-sheet&utm_medium=copy_link&utm_source=customer

Thanks I hadn’t seen this.

[Anonymous]

[twitter]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:His family has started a GoFundMe.

https://www.gofundme.com/f/the-family-of-the-young-man-in-citi-bike-incident?member=27119691&sharetype=teams&utm_campaign=p_na+share-sheet&utm_medium=copy_link&utm_source=customer

Of course.

It will probably exceed the PA’s too.

[Anonymous]

So now the pregnant PA jumped over the boy to get the unrented bike. An amazing story.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:His family has started a GoFundMe.

https://www.gofundme.com/f/the-family-of-the-young-man-in-citi-bike-incident?member=27119691&sharetype=teams&utm_campaign=p_na+share-sheet&utm_medium=copy_link&utm_source=customer

Of course.

Omg people are actually donating to this grift.

Fools and their money are soon parted.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:His family has started a GoFundMe.

https://www.gofundme.com/f/the-family-of-the-young-man-in-citi-bike-incident?member=27119691&sharetype=teams&utm_campaign=p_na+share-sheet&utm_medium=copy_link&utm_source=customer

Of course.

Omg people are actually donating to this grift.

As an immigrant myself, it is always interesting to watch how other recent immigrants learn how to game the system in America. Set up a hate crime that involves a white woman and suddenly you are a victim of white supremacy/racism. It is a hot topic to make money of.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:[twitter]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:His family has started a GoFundMe.

https://www.gofundme.com/f/the-family-of-the-young-man-in-citi-bike-incident?member=27119691&sharetype=teams&utm_campaign=p_na+share-sheet&utm_medium=copy_link&utm_source=customer

Of course.

It will probably exceed the PA’s too.

Doesn't that mean that PA is wrong, then? Public opinion matters!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So now the pregnant PA jumped over the boy to get the unrented bike. An amazing story.

I thought she shoved a frail young child off a bike?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Him trying to take it with her on it is not a fact.
The way they're awkwardly lined up makes his story make sense. It looks like she stuck her leg over the bar and tried to gain possession of it while his hands were already on it. It also males sense why he says she's putting her stomach on him and why he is so calmly holding his ground.
She's like that person who hops in your cab while you're opening the door.

A joy ride? You mean ride home. It's not a stolen car. People are allowed to go home and it's not a negative thing. The rarity of these e bikes means that she is likely use to pedaling a bike home.

"Probably the most punishment he's had in his life"
Yeah ok. Tell me you don't know immigrant parents w/o telling me.

The newer videos on Twitter by TizzyEnt demonstrates more accurate videos and the receipts from all parties. Sarah Jane Comrie is a liar!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Him trying to take it with her on it is not a fact.
The way they're awkwardly lined up makes his story make sense. It looks like she stuck her leg over the bar and tried to gain possession of it while his hands were already on it. It also males sense why he says she's putting her stomach on him and why he is so calmly holding his ground.
She's like that person who hops in your cab while you're opening the door.

A joy ride? You mean ride home. It's not a stolen car. People are allowed to go home and it's not a negative thing. The rarity of these e bikes means that she is likely use to pedaling a bike home.

"Probably the most punishment he's had in his life"
Yeah ok. Tell me you don't know immigrant parents w/o telling me.

The newer videos on Twitter by TizzyEnt demonstrates more accurate videos and the receipts from all parties. Sarah Jane Comrie is a liar!

Links or it didn't happen

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Him trying to take it with her on it is not a fact.
The way they're awkwardly lined up makes his story make sense. It looks like she stuck her leg over the bar and tried to gain possession of it while his hands were already on it. It also males sense why he says she's putting her stomach on him and why he is so calmly holding his ground.
She's like that person who hops in your cab while you're opening the door.

A joy ride? You mean ride home. It's not a stolen car. People are allowed to go home and it's not a negative thing. The rarity of these e bikes means that she is likely use to pedaling a bike home.

"Probably the most punishment he's had in his life"
Yeah ok. Tell me you don't know immigrant parents w/o telling me.

Except he admitted he moved the bike back onto the dock with her on it. Are you saying he's lying?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Per the sister, it sounds like he rented the bike and used it. He then docked it and after 5-6 minutes, she approached him to use it, he declined (but he wasn't renting/paying for the bike), she asked again, he declined, and she then overrode his no and rented the bike. He was holding the bike, but hadn't paid for it and wasn't paying for it.

If he was holding it but hadn't yet paid for it, and she rented it out from underneath him, isn't that exactly what some posters here had thought he did to her, and argued that the bike belonged to the person sitting on it, before they paid?

He wasn’t holding it.

Where is that certainty coming from, PP?

He certainly didn't pay for it so he has no right to claim it forever and ever because he's thinking about using it later. That's not how life works.

So you get from that to "he wasn't holding it?"

Standing next to a bike does not mean its your bike. Having rented it means its your bike. These joyriders shouldn't be dominating these bikes for fun when others need them.

I don't disagree with the larger point. I do disagree with the certainty of "He wasn't holding it."

Can you (or the other PP, if not you) explain that, or can we chalk it up to wishful thinking?

If he had been, she wouldn’t have been able to get on it.

He was probably close by eating a snack.

Wasn’t he eating ice cream? Not clicking on OneNews to check my memory, though.

Anyway, close is not the same as next to. She can be forgiven for thinking nobody was using the bike.

No one using the bike is subjective. She politely asked to use it and he politely declined. It sounds like this happened twice. He had not rented it so she took it. He decided it was his and shoved it in the dock with her on it and rented it instead. He probably wasn’t thinking about he could hurt her or the baby and had no intent to harm her as she did not seem scared of him. Both handled it badly in the heat of the moment.

According to the boy. Not sure why you’re so accepting of his story when he released a misleading video.

the “boy”?

Did you seriously just refer to a young Black man as a “boy”

WTF is wrong with you?

+1 Seriously. We can all see that he is a young Black man. That's one reason the encounter is surprising.

He is not a "man" because he is a 17 year old in high school. He is not registered for the Selective Service, he cannot purchase cigarettes or alcohol and he still needs his paretnts to sign a permission slip. He is in fact still a child.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Per the sister, it sounds like he rented the bike and used it. He then docked it and after 5-6 minutes, she approached him to use it, he declined (but he wasn't renting/paying for the bike), she asked again, he declined, and she then overrode his no and rented the bike. He was holding the bike, but hadn't paid for it and wasn't paying for it.

If he was holding it but hadn't yet paid for it, and she rented it out from underneath him, isn't that exactly what some posters here had thought he did to her, and argued that the bike belonged to the person sitting on it, before they paid?

He wasn’t holding it.

Where is that certainty coming from, PP?

He certainly didn't pay for it so he has no right to claim it forever and ever because he's thinking about using it later. That's not how life works.

So you get from that to "he wasn't holding it?"

Standing next to a bike does not mean its your bike. Having rented it means its your bike. These joyriders shouldn't be dominating these bikes for fun when others need them.

I don't disagree with the larger point. I do disagree with the certainty of "He wasn't holding it."

Can you (or the other PP, if not you) explain that, or can we chalk it up to wishful thinking?

If he had been, she wouldn’t have been able to get on it.

He was probably close by eating a snack.

Wasn’t he eating ice cream? Not clicking on OneNews to check my memory, though.

Anyway, close is not the same as next to. She can be forgiven for thinking nobody was using the bike.

No one using the bike is subjective. She politely asked to use it and he politely declined. It sounds like this happened twice. He had not rented it so she took it. He decided it was his and shoved it in the dock with her on it and rented it instead. He probably wasn’t thinking about he could hurt her or the baby and had no intent to harm her as she did not seem scared of him. Both handled it badly in the heat of the moment.

According to the boy. Not sure why you’re so accepting of his story when he released a misleading video.

the “boy”?

Did you seriously just refer to a young Black man as a “boy”

WTF is wrong with you?

NP. Yes, a minor male is a boy. A minor female is a girl. Isn’t language amazing?

Homeboy

Is this supposed to be response to my comment

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Him trying to take it with her on it is not a fact.
The way they're awkwardly lined up makes his story make sense. It looks like she stuck her leg over the bar and tried to gain possession of it while his hands were already on it. It also males sense why he says she's putting her stomach on him and why he is so calmly holding his ground.
She's like that person who hops in your cab while you're opening the door.

A joy ride? You mean ride home. It's not a stolen car. People are allowed to go home and it's not a negative thing. The rarity of these e bikes means that she is likely use to pedaling a bike home.

"Probably the most punishment he's had in his life"
Yeah ok. Tell me you don't know immigrant parents w/o telling me.

The newer videos on Twitter by TizzyEnt demonstrates more accurate videos and the receipts from all parties. Sarah Jane Comrie is a liar!

Links or it didn't happen

https://twitter.com/TizzyEnt/status/1661395687215439873?cxt=HHwWgoC9_eaku44uAAAA