ECNL moving to school year not calendar

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That article doesn’t really say anything more than what’s been said here. He makes it sound like it’s a done deal with no confirmation on what the change will actually be (even though everyone assumes Aug 1 - July 31) and no source/name as to where he got the info or the reactions “big and small”.

Worth noting that he says it is a done deal as a critic, not a cheerleader.

Who knows if they're a critic or a cheerleader. It's irresponsible to write an article without citing sources. In fact many would call it plagiarism if not specifically defined as an opinion piece.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That article doesn’t really say anything more than what’s been said here. He makes it sound like it’s a done deal with no confirmation on what the change will actually be (even though everyone assumes Aug 1 - July 31) and no source/name as to where he got the info or the reactions “big and small”.

Worth noting that he says it is a done deal as a critic, not a cheerleader.

Who knows if they're a critic or a cheerleader. It's irresponsible to write an article without citing sources. In fact many would call it plagiarism if not specifically defined as an opinion piece.

Do you know what plagiarism is?

[Anonymous]

I'm stunned that there aren't any real journalists in this country who would call up the people in charge at US Soccer / ECNL / USYS / MLS Next/ USCS etc ... and ask them directly about this issue.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That article doesn’t really say anything more than what’s been said here. He makes it sound like it’s a done deal with no confirmation on what the change will actually be (even though everyone assumes Aug 1 - July 31) and no source/name as to where he got the info or the reactions “big and small”.

Worth noting that he says it is a done deal as a critic, not a cheerleader.

Who knows if they're a critic or a cheerleader. It's irresponsible to write an article without citing sources. In fact many would call it plagiarism if not specifically defined as an opinion piece.

It seemed as if he spoke to US soccer directly?

“US Soccer identified several reasons why it is reverting to the school-based system.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That article doesn’t really say anything more than what’s been said here. He makes it sound like it’s a done deal with no confirmation on what the change will actually be (even though everyone assumes Aug 1 - July 31) and no source/name as to where he got the info or the reactions “big and small”.

Worth noting that he says it is a done deal as a critic, not a cheerleader.

Who knows if they're a critic or a cheerleader. It's irresponsible to write an article without citing sources. In fact many would call it plagiarism if not specifically defined as an opinion piece.

It seemed as if he spoke to US soccer directly?

“US Soccer identified several reasons why it is reverting to the school-based system.”

There is this one also that says the change is "expected."

https://www.insideworldfootball.com/2024/10/22/us-soccer-threatens-youth-soccer-eco-system-chaos-age-group-date-change/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That article doesn’t really say anything more than what’s been said here. He makes it sound like it’s a done deal with no confirmation on what the change will actually be (even though everyone assumes Aug 1 - July 31) and no source/name as to where he got the info or the reactions “big and small”.

Worth noting that he says it is a done deal as a critic, not a cheerleader.

Who knows if they're a critic or a cheerleader. It's irresponsible to write an article without citing sources. In fact many would call it plagiarism if not specifically defined as an opinion piece.

Do you know what plagiarism is?

In this case the author is getting info somewhere and repeating it in the article written. The plagiarism is occurring when they write info but don't cite where it's coming from. The person being plagiarized is the one that provided the info to the articles author.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That article doesn’t really say anything more than what’s been said here. He makes it sound like it’s a done deal with no confirmation on what the change will actually be (even though everyone assumes Aug 1 - July 31) and no source/name as to where he got the info or the reactions “big and small”.

Worth noting that he says it is a done deal as a critic, not a cheerleader.

Who knows if they're a critic or a cheerleader. It's irresponsible to write an article without citing sources. In fact many would call it plagiarism if not specifically defined as an opinion piece.

It seemed as if he spoke to US soccer directly?

“US Soccer identified several reasons why it is reverting to the school-based system.”

Or US Soccer made a statement somewhere on BY v SY that nobody else is aware of.

[Anonymous]

This is old news. Writing been on the wall for 2 months now, some just don't want to see it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That article doesn’t really say anything more than what’s been said here. He makes it sound like it’s a done deal with no confirmation on what the change will actually be (even though everyone assumes Aug 1 - July 31) and no source/name as to where he got the info or the reactions “big and small”.

Worth noting that he says it is a done deal as a critic, not a cheerleader.

Who knows if they're a critic or a cheerleader. It's irresponsible to write an article without citing sources. In fact many would call it plagiarism if not specifically defined as an opinion piece.

Do you know what plagiarism is?

In this case the author is getting info somewhere and repeating it in the article written. The plagiarism is occurring when they write info but don't cite where it's coming from. The person being plagiarized is the one that provided the info to the articles author.

"according to U.S. Soccer." And reporters not listing sources is not plagiarism.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is old news. Writing been on the wall for 2 months now, some just don't want to see it.

It's been an unsubstantiated rumor that's it.

People have no issue with a change they just want official statements not rumors.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That article doesn’t really say anything more than what’s been said here. He makes it sound like it’s a done deal with no confirmation on what the change will actually be (even though everyone assumes Aug 1 - July 31) and no source/name as to where he got the info or the reactions “big and small”.

Worth noting that he says it is a done deal as a critic, not a cheerleader.

Who knows if they're a critic or a cheerleader. It's irresponsible to write an article without citing sources. In fact many would call it plagiarism if not specifically defined as an opinion piece.

Do you know what plagiarism is?

In this case the author is getting info somewhere and repeating it in the article written. The plagiarism is occurring when they write info but don't cite where it's coming from. The person being plagiarized is the one that provided the info to the articles author.

"according to U.S. Soccer." And reporters not listing sources is not plagiarism.

Ok so US Soccer told the author directly what they're planning to do before attending a meeting with other leagues on the matter?

You see how that doesn't make sense?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That article doesn’t really say anything more than what’s been said here. He makes it sound like it’s a done deal with no confirmation on what the change will actually be (even though everyone assumes Aug 1 - July 31) and no source/name as to where he got the info or the reactions “big and small”.

Worth noting that he says it is a done deal as a critic, not a cheerleader.

Who knows if they're a critic or a cheerleader. It's irresponsible to write an article without citing sources. In fact many would call it plagiarism if not specifically defined as an opinion piece.

Do you know what plagiarism is?

In this case the author is getting info somewhere and repeating it in the article written. The plagiarism is occurring when they write info but don't cite where it's coming from. The person being plagiarized is the one that provided the info to the articles author.

"according to U.S. Soccer." And reporters not listing sources is not plagiarism.

https://honor.virginia.edu/understanding-fraud#:~:text=Citation%20is%20important%20because%20it,is%20a%20form%20of%20cheating.

Citation is important because it shows that you obtained information or ideas from another source, such as a textbook, website, or research article. By failing to cite, you are falsely portraying someone else's ideas as your own; this is considered plagiarism, which is a form of cheating.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That article doesn’t really say anything more than what’s been said here. He makes it sound like it’s a done deal with no confirmation on what the change will actually be (even though everyone assumes Aug 1 - July 31) and no source/name as to where he got the info or the reactions “big and small”.

Worth noting that he says it is a done deal as a critic, not a cheerleader.

Who knows if they're a critic or a cheerleader. It's irresponsible to write an article without citing sources. In fact many would call it plagiarism if not specifically defined as an opinion piece.

Do you know what plagiarism is?

In this case the author is getting info somewhere and repeating it in the article written. The plagiarism is occurring when they write info but don't cite where it's coming from. The person being plagiarized is the one that provided the info to the articles author.

"according to U.S. Soccer." And reporters not listing sources is not plagiarism.

https://honor.virginia.edu/understanding-fraud#:~:text=Citation%20is%20important%20because%20it,is%20a%20form%20of%20cheating.

Citation is important because it shows that you obtained information or ideas from another source, such as a textbook, website, or research article. By failing to cite, you are falsely portraying someone else's ideas as your own; this is considered plagiarism, which is a form of cheating.

A student ethics code? If you don't know the difference between and an academic study and a news article, you don't know.

[Anonymous]

193 pages watching those against the change trying every possible way to say it isn't happening. Now any article as it gains traction is plagiarism? November 22 can't come soon enough. Then we can all switch to the new thread discussing how unfair the change is (that everyone spent months warning us about)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That article doesn’t really say anything more than what’s been said here. He makes it sound like it’s a done deal with no confirmation on what the change will actually be (even though everyone assumes Aug 1 - July 31) and no source/name as to where he got the info or the reactions “big and small”.

Worth noting that he says it is a done deal as a critic, not a cheerleader.

Who knows if they're a critic or a cheerleader. It's irresponsible to write an article without citing sources. In fact many would call it plagiarism if not specifically defined as an opinion piece.

Do you know what plagiarism is?

In this case the author is getting info somewhere and repeating it in the article written. The plagiarism is occurring when they write info but don't cite where it's coming from. The person being plagiarized is the one that provided the info to the articles author.

"according to U.S. Soccer." And reporters not listing sources is not plagiarism.

Ok so US Soccer told the author directly what they're planning to do before attending a meeting with other leagues on the matter?

You see how that doesn't make sense?

It makes sense when you realize how good of a listener USSF is on youth soccer.