Meghan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates Part 4

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Some of the posters need to dial the number, ASAP. Seek help.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Agreed
W&K are boring vanilla, H&M are much more interesting

However, still Not future King & Queen. I find M & H very competitive sibling rivalrous

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They said they wanted privacy on their Sussex royal website. Meghan was very good when she was “on” as a royal. The issue is she didn’t like being the second tier couple, didn’t like ANY bad press about her (even though most was overwhelmingly positive) and really seems to thrive on drama (with her family, his family, the press,whoever).

What I found most telling were the stories from her first maid of honor and her former manager and her uncle that all pretty much said, in different ways, that she uses people, then ghosts them.

She did the same with the royal family. She and Charles shared such a special bond that he walked her down the aisle. Then he cut off their money and boom - he’s blacklisted.

This is demonstrably not true.

I agree. Meghan had a tremendous problem being second behind Kate and William. This is just the way it is and has been for hundreds of years, it is not personal. Meanwhile, Meghan had no problem pulling rank on all the family beneath her! If she can't be number one or on par with Kate and Willaim, then she is unhappy. Her father spoiled her rotten, despite the fact that he wasn't wealthy.

She also used and dropped her first husband. She has no relationship with her father, sibling, and has nearly no friends from her first 30 years of life. Now, she has alienated Harry's family.

Little Empress syndrome + little brother rivalry = conflagration 🚨

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They said they wanted privacy on their Sussex royal website. Meghan was very good when she was “on” as a royal. The issue is she didn’t like being the second tier couple, didn’t like ANY bad press about her (even though most was overwhelmingly positive) and really seems to thrive on drama (with her family, his family, the press,whoever).

What I found most telling were the stories from her first maid of honor and her former manager and her uncle that all pretty much said, in different ways, that she uses people, then ghosts them.

She did the same with the royal family. She and Charles shared such a special bond that he walked her down the aisle. Then he cut off their money and boom - he’s blacklisted.

This is demonstrably not true.

I agree. Meghan had a tremendous problem being second behind Kate and William. This is just the way it is and has been for hundreds of years, it is not personal. Meanwhile, Meghan had no problem pulling rank on all the family beneath her! If she can't be number one or on par with Kate and Willaim, then she is unhappy. Her father spoiled her rotten, despite the fact that he wasn't wealthy.

She also used and dropped her first husband. She has no relationship with her father, sibling, and has nearly no friends from her first 30 years of life. Now, she has alienated Harry's family.

Little Empress syndrome + little brother rivalry = conflagration 🚨

+100

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They said they wanted privacy on their Sussex royal website. Meghan was very good when she was “on” as a royal. The issue is she didn’t like being the second tier couple, didn’t like ANY bad press about her (even though most was overwhelmingly positive) and really seems to thrive on drama (with her family, his family, the press,whoever).

What I found most telling were the stories from her first maid of honor and her former manager and her uncle that all pretty much said, in different ways, that she uses people, then ghosts them.

She did the same with the royal family. She and Charles shared such a special bond that he walked her down the aisle. Then he cut off their money and boom - he’s blacklisted.

This is demonstrably not true.

I agree. Meghan had a tremendous problem being second behind Kate and William. This is just the way it is and has been for hundreds of years, it is not personal. Meanwhile, Meghan had no problem pulling rank on all the family beneath her! If she can't be number one or on par with Kate and Willaim, then she is unhappy. Her father spoiled her rotten, despite the fact that he wasn't wealthy.

She also used and dropped her first husband. She has no relationship with her father, sibling, and has nearly no friends from her first 30 years of life. Now, she has alienated Harry's family.

Little Empress syndrome + little brother rivalry = conflagration 🚨

A whole lot of projection and guesswork here. The Little Empress syndrome is literally just straight up conjecture, and there is nothing in Harry's past or statements throughout the years that would suggest that he envies William's position, so the little brother rivalry situation rings false to me.

[Anonymous]

Really well written piece on the media furor over Meghan.

https://bylinetimes.com/2021/07/20/the-assassination-of-meghan-markle/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They said they wanted privacy on their Sussex royal website. Meghan was very good when she was “on” as a royal. The issue is she didn’t like being the second tier couple, didn’t like ANY bad press about her (even though most was overwhelmingly positive) and really seems to thrive on drama (with her family, his family, the press,whoever).

What I found most telling were the stories from her first maid of honor and her former manager and her uncle that all pretty much said, in different ways, that she uses people, then ghosts them.

She did the same with the royal family. She and Charles shared such a special bond that he walked her down the aisle. Then he cut off their money and boom - he’s blacklisted.

This is demonstrably not true.

I agree. Meghan had a tremendous problem being second behind Kate and William. This is just the way it is and has been for hundreds of years, it is not personal. Meanwhile, Meghan had no problem pulling rank on all the family beneath her! If she can't be number one or on par with Kate and Willaim, then she is unhappy. Her father spoiled her rotten, despite the fact that he wasn't wealthy.

She also used and dropped her first husband. She has no relationship with her father, sibling, and has nearly no friends from her first 30 years of life. Now, she has alienated Harry's family.

Little Empress syndrome + little brother rivalry = conflagration 🚨

A whole lot of projection and guesswork here. The Little Empress syndrome is literally just straight up conjecture, and there is nothing in Harry's past or statements throughout the years that would suggest that he envies William's position, so the little brother rivalry situation rings false to me.

"Prince Harry said ‘I’ll be King’ after Prince William said he didn’t want throne"
https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1408803/prince-harry-prince-william-king-meghan-markle-royal-family-oprah-spt/amp

[Anonymous]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9816567/Ill-Meghan-COURT-grandchildren-says-Thomas-Markle.html

I hope he wins.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Really well written piece on the media furor over Meghan.

https://bylinetimes.com/2021/07/20/the-assassination-of-meghan-markle/

Nah, reads more like a blind supporter of Markle oblivious to reality and wants to protect his favorite little thing.

It's pretty hard to ignore the simple facts. This is a woman who has cut off her entire family (except her mother), most of her former friends, and now has cut off her husband's family.

Notice the pattern?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9816567/Ill-Meghan-COURT-grandchildren-says-Thomas-Markle.html

I hope he wins.

He won’t. The court has to find that there was a preexisting relationship with the child. He has none. This is just another stupid stunt for the press.


https://www.courts.ca.gov/17976.htm?rdeLocaleAttr=en

[Anonymous]

Another lie from this thread…that you can’t be in the line of succession without a christening. Eugenie’s son is listed and they had to cancel his christening for covid concerns:
https://www.royal.uk/succession

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Really well written piece on the media furor over Meghan.

https://bylinetimes.com/2021/07/20/the-assassination-of-meghan-markle/

Nah, reads more like a blind supporter of Markle oblivious to reality and wants to protect his favorite little thing.

It's pretty hard to ignore the simple facts. This is a woman who has cut off her entire family (except her mother), most of her former friends, and now has cut off her husband's family.

Notice the pattern?

This is not true.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Really well written piece on the media furor over Meghan.

https://bylinetimes.com/2021/07/20/the-assassination-of-meghan-markle/

Nah, reads more like a blind supporter of Markle oblivious to reality and wants to protect his favorite little thing.

It's pretty hard to ignore the simple facts. This is a woman who has cut off her entire family (except her mother), most of her former friends, and now has cut off her husband's family.

Notice the pattern?

This is not true.

What’s not true?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They said they wanted privacy on their Sussex royal website. Meghan was very good when she was “on” as a royal. The issue is she didn’t like being the second tier couple, didn’t like ANY bad press about her (even though most was overwhelmingly positive) and really seems to thrive on drama (with her family, his family, the press,whoever).

What I found most telling were the stories from her first maid of honor and her former manager and her uncle that all pretty much said, in different ways, that she uses people, then ghosts them.

She did the same with the royal family. She and Charles shared such a special bond that he walked her down the aisle. Then he cut off their money and boom - he’s blacklisted.

This is demonstrably not true.

I agree. Meghan had a tremendous problem being second behind Kate and William. This is just the way it is and has been for hundreds of years, it is not personal. Meanwhile, Meghan had no problem pulling rank on all the family beneath her! If she can't be number one or on par with Kate and Willaim, then she is unhappy. Her father spoiled her rotten, despite the fact that he wasn't wealthy.

She also used and dropped her first husband. She has no relationship with her father, sibling, and has nearly no friends from her first 30 years of life. Now, she has alienated Harry's family.

This is also demonstrably not true. Meghan haters seem to have a loose grasp on reality.

This seems unlikely. We don’t know the identity of Archie’s godparents which suggests they are normies.

No it doesn’t.

Are people who are already famous concerned from a loss of privacy due to being a godparent of the child of someone less famous than them? Also your original point is that she is a fame whore so why wouldn’t she publicize the famous godparents?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Really well written piece on the media furor over Meghan.

https://bylinetimes.com/2021/07/20/the-assassination-of-meghan-markle/

Nah, reads more like a blind supporter of Markle oblivious to reality and wants to protect his favorite little thing.

It's pretty hard to ignore the simple facts. This is a woman who has cut off her entire family (except her mother), most of her former friends, and now has cut off her husband's family.

Notice the pattern?

This is not true.

What’s not true?

She has not cut off her entire family nor most of her former friends. It's also not accurate to say that she has "cut off her husband's family." Neither of us know the specifics of their relationship with the BRF at present, but last we heard they have regular Zoom calls with the Queen. Harry's gone back to the UK twice now for family engagements. Hardly seems "cut off."