If so, please help schools in the poor neighborhoods first before worrying about TJ. |
Why don't you think the hispanic kids will have an opportunity to attend TJ? |
Her version of "helping" poor schools is to bring everyone down to the lowered standard rather than to bring those at the poorer schools up... |
it's not a matter of thinking, it's a matter of looking at the numbers TJ publishes |
So why not spend your energy getting those kids prepared to apply to TJ? |
|
It is easier to dump all over TJ and try to get it shut down than to actually acknowledge and do the work to improve skills and resumes of those who are not currently making the cut for admission.
Sounds like laziness. Keep that same energy for preparing other minority groups for TJ application and maybe you can get somewhere. |
+1. We should have funding (from people who care so much) so that any kid can use to pay for prep class to TJ. Would that be the simplest solution! |
DP why is it wrong to push for more rigor across the board? |
One of the best ways to help those schools would be for the top students at those schools to have heroes from their community who are older than them and were successful in applying to and attending TJ - and that had a positive experience once they were there. It is true that a part of this problem is that students from these communities are not especially interested in TJ, and a big part of the reason for that is that they don't believe that they are welcome at the school or don't know about it until very late in the process. This is a part of the problem that needs to be solved by creating a less toxic and anti-underrepresented atmosphere within the school, and by creating pathways into the school for students who are maximizing opportunities in their environment by succeeding in Algebra 1 in 8th grade. |
All of this crap about how changing the course of admissions will be "lowering the standards" needs to stop. There's a difference between lowering the standards and changing or improving the standards so that they will do a better job of identifying students with potential rather than taking a snapshot of what kids have already been exposed to. Right now the TJ admissions process does an exceptional job of identifying kids who are a) great test takers and b) have been shoehorned, usually by their parents, into a STEM career. It does NOT do a great job of identifying kids who have the potential to change the world or serve their communities. To be sure, there still are these kids in every class at TJ, but there are an overwhelming number of what a previous poster referred to as "prep drones" who have vaulted themselves above other, more qualified candidates through artificially high exam performance and artificially strong STEM resumes. |
People at poor schools have many things to worry about, and going to TJ may be the least thing to worry about in their minds. Honestly, one doesn't have to go to TJ in order to be successful. Unless you attend one of those poor schools, you won't understand how much issues we have. |
But that's just it. The admissions process gives a huge advantage right now to families who DO worry about it for years and years, and it shouldn't. TJ shouldn't have to be "a thing you worry about" for years in order to have access to it. Indeed, the point you make is one of the biggest arguments for why things need to change. |
This is a STEM school. not some flowery liberal arts high school. The admissions requirements are good for STEM |
Who says you shouldnt plan for years to go to TJ? youre just making things up and passing them off them as truth. |
Changing the admission to TJ May bring a few more top students from these schools. What about thousands other kids? Change to TJ admission would not help us much in anyway. I’m speaking from the experience of having kids attending tittle 1 school. |