TJ has about a 15% acceptance rate. Planning for years to go to TJ and giving up tons of other opportunities during your formative years for a process that tons of hugely qualified students don't succeed in - and by the way, has no tangible benefits that carry with you if you fail - is such a huge waste. The problem is that, even assuming an outstanding student who is talented and interested in STEM, success in the TJ admissions process is greatly helped by dropping everything that a student enjoys and might want to explore to maximize your STEM credentials and test-taking ability. Huge numbers of these students are being rejected by this process every year even if they go completely by the book and plan for it since early elementary school. It's unhealthy and the process needs to change so as to disincentivize this sort of behavior. |
None of this is any of your business or concern for other people's kids. If you dont want your kid to study hard from elementary, dont do it. |
There is a difference between studying hard from elementary and selling out your kid's childhood to optimize a TJ admissions process that, if you fail, carries no additional benefit. There shouldn't be a way to optimize the TJ process that goes beyond "get good grades and make the most of your opportunities". |
1+ |
Just because you don't want your kids to work hard doesn't mean you get to dictate that other people not push their kids to work harder. This really takes the cake. You really want people to minimize their ambition so that your kid can take the easy way and not have competition... ? |
Work hard =/= optimize the TJ process. It's amazing the extent to which the status quo crowd wants to pretend that they are the only people who work hard, when in reality, many of them (not all, but many) are getting ahead because of privileged access to material that is supposed to be hidden. There are a million ways to work hard and achieve merit, but right now only one of those ways is granting access to TJ, and it's almost singlehandedly responsible for the toxic environment that pervades the school and causes kids to resent their parents, grow to hate STEM, and consider suicide. But the status quo crowd wants to preserve that single access point - not because it serves the greater STEM community, but because it's the only way that they can set themselves apart. Single access points should be reserved for things like the Spelling Bee, not the only taxpayer funded selective high school in FCPS. |
that's fine, but when college admissions come around, don't be surprised when that kids loses out to better rounded kids |
Should a student fail to get access, they're already built themselves up for a successful high school and college experience. They can test out of a number of math classes via AP exams, and have built up enough STEM related knowledge from projects and camps that they will be ahead of the game in engineering school. |
+1000 - this happens to TJ kids every year. Kids who are shocked when their friends of the same race who didn't get into TJ end up getting into the schools that they wanted to go to. |
big fish in a small pond vs small fish in a big pond. Personal's choice! |
|
The entire process has been compromised for the class of 2024. (See the other thread)
There are likely dozens of children that would have gained admission if the company had not systematically coached children to cheat. If I was TJ Admissions, I would investigate. I would also offer admission to every child on the waitlist, especially if they are from a minority group or a girl. |
I have a daughter and she is from a minority group. I would not want her to be accepted for these 2 reasons. If she is not good enough to be there, she should not be there. |
Again. Not your concern. Worry about your own kids. TJ kids don't need you to worry about whether they can get into college. |
I would emphasize that we only have hard and incontrovertible evidence of fraud for 2024, but we have circumstantial evidence of fraud for at least 2023 as well, given that 2022 was the first year of the Quant-Q. |
This entire post is nonsense. You don't explain a single statement you're putting forth as fact. Not a single one. |