this is true. if you kid has love ukelele for years, they might say, hey: maybe start teaching ukelele or start some sort of local band? if your kid loves birding and crocheting, hey, make little birds with crochet and sell on etsy. if your kid loves nature and started the environmental club, they might say, hey, these 2 summer programs are great, and you might want to get a job planting trees this summer. if a kid loves politics but is also an artist, hey, there's this local/state art council with your lawmakers your junior should apply for, and a job at an art gallery. and don't forget to max out on those advanced art credits so you can create the art portfolio next year. its not manufacturing "trendy" or "hot" ECs out of thin air. the interests are already there. sometimes there isn't someone at home to help thread everything together. there's one clueless, dense know-it-all "ivy mom of 2" on here who LOVES to spew her nonsense about her fabulously gifted and amah-ZING kids. She needs a life. |
yes, he needs more focus. what is his major interest? agree, this is where a college counselor can help. |
😂 |
These are great ideas, just be mindful that the impact of these is minimal for top schools. We all know you need near perfect score, top of class with most rigorous classes. Whether you crochet or plant trees, or best sumo wrestler in country, is not what will get your kids in to top school no matter how great the suggestions are. Obviously the kids with perfect scores who are more interesting have an advantage. |
He will likely study STEM, not sure what. He loves history and art. He is an amazing artist. |
OFC. They have to be smart. Is anyone debating that? For some privates that's a min 3.8uw - for some its higher. Its a given that you need top grades and rigor/scores as a gating item for T25. Its the #1 point in admissions. If you don't have that, AO won't even read the activities list...... But, once you get past that gating threshold for academic scoring, the story/narrative and activities do matter to distinguish you. That nationally ranked top judo/fencing/wrestler might be needed if even its not a recruited sport (we see that ALL the time). Smart kids who do unusual things are more interesting. I learned that the academic score is actually a small part of the entire admissions review equation. |
A high-priced consultant is white glove service. The won't just suggest teaching ukele or starting a local band...they will arrange for you to volunteer at a prominent music NPO teaching ukele If your kid loves birding and crocheting, they will incorporate your kid's business (literally, they will file the papers and what not) and put you in contact with a web designer and a shopify account to launch your own business If your kid loves nature, they will arrange for you to intern with with Sierra Club If your kid loves politics and is an artist, they will arrange for you to intern with your local council member and/or arrange for an internship with an art gallery This is why folks don't care about spending $50k or $100k or whatever. It's beyond just suggesting do X, Y or Z...they will literally help make X, Y or Z happen. |
I'd definitely focus on the art. https://www.ivywise.com/ivywise-knowledgebase/the-value-of-a-steam-education/ https://www.collegevine.com/faq/6667/should-my-artistic-background-play-a-big-role-in-my-application-if-i-m-applying-for-a-stem-major https://www.crimsoneducation.org/nz/resources/ask-crimson/t/stem-vs-humanities-who-wins/1571/ |
So? Someone's always got more money to do things. Let them do this. Im not so worried about "white glove college counseling". |
Yes, the kid I know at an Ivy now is super smart and developed a unique niche interest and deep expertise related to an unpopular major. Totally different from “curating” a few clubs an a service trip to Africa. |
You clearly aren't following the thread...just trying to explain why people pay these kinds of amounts. It's not just for suggestions on activities or colleges and essay help. |
Lol. OP here. the is exactly the kind of crazy talk I mean
|
Yes! If you make a good effort as a parent to research the college process, you know what courses your kid needs to be competitive. For us, it's really about challenging the kid and making a balance of school work with their desired ECs. I know how to select colleges, but liked the CC help as for our 2nd kid, they found several schools I was not really aware of. They know the ins/outs of schools and are aware that blindly applying to 15of the top 25 is not a good approach (no way your kid really would be a good fit at all of those). So they help you find schools that are a good fit (for location, size, class size, opportunities (want to do research sophomore year +? ) and to find schools that let your kid change majors easily. My kid is engineering, wanted the ability to select any engineering without having to "compete" and if they wanted to switch out, wanted business or Chemistry as a viable option (at many Direct admit/impacted major schools that is simply not an option). So the CC helped us come up with a list of 10+ schools that met all criteria. The next best part of a CC is they manage the schedule so you don't have to nag. Ours required the Nov 1 (and Nov 15) to be submitted 4-5 days prior. So no stress/rushing and no last minute "oh shi$ the system is down wTH do we do" And supplementals were teed up for RD to submit shortly after Dec 15, if ED1 was not an Accept. That meant Nov and Dec were less stress, and our senior got to enjoy their senior year. Better essays because they were done in advance. But in reality, other than the List of colleges, you can do most of it yourself (our CC told me I could be a CC if I wanted to_----no desire to deal with parents but I have the skill set to help) |
Exactly---the 6-10 hours is enough to address your kid's deficiencies and issues on the test. Then the kid practices and you should be at their "ideal score" fairly fast. However, know that only so much can help---If your kid starts at a 1100 or 1200, you are not likely to get to 1500. And if you start at 1450, it will be much harder to get a 150 increase (unless it's literally all silly mistakes). So mileage may vary, but yes, the 20-30+ hour programs are overkill. and Also, if you need to do that to get the SAT needed for a school, are you really a candidate for that school? is it really the best place for your kid? Might they struggle once they get in? Just something to think about. Because not everyone at a T20 in Chem 101 is going to get an A, there will be a curve and some will get Bs&Cs. And yes, for most doing so, that will be the first time in their life they haven't gotten an A/been theTop5% of their class. But at a T20, someone has to be at the Bottom 25-50% |
The truly naturally gifted smart kids are getting 1200 on the SAT in 6th grade. They don’t require any tutoring. They get near perfect or perfect scores in one sitting on the first try when they take the test as a junior or senior for college admissions. They don’t need to spend hours and hours studying or hiring tutors in High School - even at the most competitive schools taking the most rigorous courses. I know this because I have this kid. And as a parent you really only understand what I’m talking about if you have a kid like this. Our other kids are smart - work really hard and get good grades, study, tutoring, etc to get good test scores. But it is not the same. There is no comparison. AOs can’t tell the difference between the SMART kids and the ones that prepped and got tutoring and took the SAT 3 or 4 times. (Not saying there’s anything wrong with kids working super hard to improve). So I imagine at top schools you’re surrounded mostly by hard workers (and/or kids of parents who can hire the best of the best to tutor, curate etc) not necessarily the brightest kids out there. |