Paul Bartkowski School Board Candidate Forum

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
paulforfcsb wrote:re homeschooling this year - just based on past experience homeschooling during the covid shutdowns. She needed some more attention and rigor - and she's getting it. We use an online program through Well Trained Mind Academy - great curriculum.


OK, so public school during Covid wasn't good enough for your kid, public school last year after Covid wasn't good enough for your kid, and now regular non-Covid 6th grade isn't good enough for your kid? When you live in one of the best public school areas in Fairfax?

Sorry, SB candidates need to put their money where their mouth is. I wouldn't vote for Karl or Melanie for similar reasons.
It does look like a great curriculum. Will FCPS pay so parents can send their child with similar needs to WTMA too?

https://www.wtmacademy.com/


I would be interested in your candidacy if you were talking more about bringing in rigorous curriculum like Well Trained Mind into FCPS, and a whole lot less about weird Republican fixations on YA books.


YES!

Agree. I appreciate that you are doing this thread and just seeing it today for the first time. If your reply here is that the current school board is spending the time on sexual identity matters that it could be using to improve the curriculum... that isn't convincing. I have three kids in FCPS: the curriculum is especially weak in humanities, extremely weak at the elementary school level. I am all for improving it. But I don't see the obsession with sexuality that others see and find it surprising and concerning that it has become such a focus for some candidates.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2023/10/07/fairfax-county-school-board-election-guide/

Dranesville District
Paul Bartkowski, 46
Party: Republican endorsed
Bartkowski said he’s running for school board because he feels that the board has failed to prioritize the education of all students over ideological policy agendas. The biggest issue facing the school district, he said, is the decline in test scores. He said he wants to move the board away from promoting “controversial, ideological causes under the guise of education.” Specifically, he said he does not believe in policies that allow gender-fluid students to use locker rooms and restrooms.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:On your website, you say:
"At-Large" School Board Candidates Who Have Similar Goals
You can vote for up to 3 "At-Large" School Board Candidates
CASSANDRA AUCOIN
MAUREEN BRODY
SAUNDRA DAVIS


Can you please explain how your goals are similar to Maureen Brody's goals?


Not Paul, but I'm amused by how you think this is such a "gotcha" moment.

Here are the main priorities on Brody's site (I'd never checked before):

* Refocus curriculum on fundamentals
* Improve low-performing schools
* Get spending under control
* Modernize school infrastructure

These priorities or goals seem sensible to me and I suspect they'd also seem sensible to many other parents if they took a look. And the fact that it's coming from someone who sent her kids to Lewis HS is a plus. Other social justice warriors in the county like Sujatha Hampton and VH sent their kids to Langley and Woodson, respectively.


So you do think that Maureen Brody and Paul Bartkowski are aligned?


I don't have a view as to whether they are "aligned." I'm not even sure what that means.

Is it like asking Robyn Lady whether she'd also invite LBGTQ teens who are having a dispute with their parents to come live with her and her partner, merely because one of her more vocal supporters has said he'd offer shelter in his home to LBGTQ teens in such circumstances?

By asking such a question, you attempt to imply that people with certain backgrounds or affiliations march in lock-step on every issue, and of course they don't. It's not a good look for you, nor does it serve the interests of the candidates you support.


That’s not a fair comparison at all.

Maureen Brody was endorsed by the Fairfax GOP at the same time they endorsed Paul Bartkowski. A question about who Paul supports and is aligned with is completely legitimate considering they will both appear on Republican sample ballots together.


Moderate centrist Megan McLaughlin was on the same democratic endorsed sample ballot as far left extremist activists Frisch and Omeish.

Most sample ballots and endorsements represent a spectrum of political opinions of their political party. It is pretty simplistic to pretend like this is some gotcha moment.

Thank you for educating the trolls. 😊


You missed the part where Paul Bartkowski actually endorses Maureen Brody as an at-large candidate on his website.

I guess when you don’t have any on-topic, intellectual points to discuss then you resort to name calling.


My sincere apologies if you are not a troll, but rather a genuine resident of the Dranesville district. I see your point and I will do my best to apply critical thinking skills instead to avoid going round in circles.

It’s evident that Paul Bartkowski is being put to a different standard than that of his opponent. Robin Lady is a Democrat and was endorsed by the same party that placed Abrar Omeish on the Board, to top it off, as an At-Large member! What does this say about R. Lady? Should she have declined the endorsement? For background information on Abrar Omeish:

https://asrainvestigates.substack.com/p/exclusive-abrar-omeish-at-fundraiser

While I’m not familiar with Maureen Brody, candidates like her on the board, independently of which party endorses them, will stand up to those who have been placed there to use and abuse our schools, our county, and our country, such is the case of Omeish. Robyn Lady, like the rest of her party, will continue to sit back while it happens, just like they did when Superintendent Reid bluntly sent the message, “Honestly, the majority doesn't always dictate, right?” to those who expressed their will through a survey, overwhelmingly opposing proposed changes that affected the entire community. Rest assured that if the need arose again, the likes of M. Brody will stand up to the Superintendent if she (along with the SB) disregard the will of the FCPS residents. And so will Paul Bartkowski, or any other candidate (endorsed by either party) that will place the needs of those he/she represents over party.




NP.

I opened that link and it is shocking. Someone as extreme and anti-Semitic as Omeish should not be on the school board:

“ FAIRFAX COUNTY, Va. – Last month, here at Luther Jackson Middle School, parents gasped as a Fairfax County Public Schools board member, Abrar Omeish, stumbled through a clumsy speech and called the historic battle of Iwo Jima “evil,” even though the decisive victory by U.S. Marines led to eventual victory by Allied forces against Nazi Germany and its leader Adolph Hitler, ending the brutal genocide of Jews in the Holocaust. . .

Omeish, it would turn out, wasn’t concerned about failing schools or lifting lagging students up to standards. Her talk was about what she characterized as the lies of American public education, which she considered to be pro-Israel, anti-Palestinian. She spoke of a teacher fired from her position for promoting the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) movement, the controversial economic and political program—and cause célèbre of worldwide leftist organizations—that would pave the way for Palestinian statehood by crippling or destroying Israel economically.

Omeish started, “When we talk about the Palestinian issue, and it affects us deeply and families are affected, and we know how important it is to us.” Indeed, when she was a girl, in 2007, her father, Esam Omeish had resigned from a Virginia state commission that former governor Tim Kaine had named him to be a member, after a video emerged of him saying that pro-Palestinians had to pursue the “way of jihad” in opposing Israel.“

I am definitely voting for Paul in the hopes of restoring centrist, sane leadership to the FCPS Board.

Plus, I am a Dranesville voter (McLean) and my daughter tells me her school - McLean HS - is falling apart due to age and neglect by the current Board, superintendent, Gatehouse, etc. Paul will work to try to change that, while his opponent only represents the status quo who neglect McLean schools as “too privileged” to even maintain. The choice for us is obvious.

+1
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:On your website, you say:
"At-Large" School Board Candidates Who Have Similar Goals
You can vote for up to 3 "At-Large" School Board Candidates
CASSANDRA AUCOIN
MAUREEN BRODY
SAUNDRA DAVIS


Can you please explain how your goals are similar to Maureen Brody's goals?


Not Paul, but I'm amused by how you think this is such a "gotcha" moment.

Here are the main priorities on Brody's site (I'd never checked before):

* Refocus curriculum on fundamentals
* Improve low-performing schools
* Get spending under control
* Modernize school infrastructure

These priorities or goals seem sensible to me and I suspect they'd also seem sensible to many other parents if they took a look. And the fact that it's coming from someone who sent her kids to Lewis HS is a plus. Other social justice warriors in the county like Sujatha Hampton and VH sent their kids to Langley and Woodson, respectively.


So you do think that Maureen Brody and Paul Bartkowski are aligned?


I don't have a view as to whether they are "aligned." I'm not even sure what that means.

Is it like asking Robyn Lady whether she'd also invite LBGTQ teens who are having a dispute with their parents to come live with her and her partner, merely because one of her more vocal supporters has said he'd offer shelter in his home to LBGTQ teens in such circumstances?

By asking such a question, you attempt to imply that people with certain backgrounds or affiliations march in lock-step on every issue, and of course they don't. It's not a good look for you, nor does it serve the interests of the candidates you support.


That’s not a fair comparison at all.

Maureen Brody was endorsed by the Fairfax GOP at the same time they endorsed Paul Bartkowski. A question about who Paul supports and is aligned with is completely legitimate considering they will both appear on Republican sample ballots together.


Moderate centrist Megan McLaughlin was on the same democratic endorsed sample ballot as far left extremist activists Frisch and Omeish.

Most sample ballots and endorsements represent a spectrum of political opinions of their political party. It is pretty simplistic to pretend like this is some gotcha moment.

Thank you for educating the trolls. 😊


You missed the part where Paul Bartkowski actually endorses Maureen Brody as an at-large candidate on his website.

I guess when you don’t have any on-topic, intellectual points to discuss then you resort to name calling.


My sincere apologies if you are not a troll, but rather a genuine resident of the Dranesville district. I see your point and I will do my best to apply critical thinking skills instead to avoid going round in circles.

It’s evident that Paul Bartkowski is being put to a different standard than that of his opponent. Robin Lady is a Democrat and was endorsed by the same party that placed Abrar Omeish on the Board, to top it off, as an At-Large member! What does this say about R. Lady? Should she have declined the endorsement? For background information on Abrar Omeish:

https://asrainvestigates.substack.com/p/exclusive-abrar-omeish-at-fundraiser

While I’m not familiar with Maureen Brody, candidates like her on the board, independently of which party endorses them, will stand up to those who have been placed there to use and abuse our schools, our county, and our country, such is the case of Omeish. Robyn Lady, like the rest of her party, will continue to sit back while it happens, just like they did when Superintendent Reid bluntly sent the message, “Honestly, the majority doesn't always dictate, right?” to those who expressed their will through a survey, overwhelmingly opposing proposed changes that affected the entire community. Rest assured that if the need arose again, the likes of M. Brody will stand up to the Superintendent if she (along with the SB) disregard the will of the FCPS residents. And so will Paul Bartkowski, or any other candidate (endorsed by either party) that will place the needs of those he/she represents over party.




NP.

I opened that link and it is shocking. Someone as extreme and anti-Semitic as Omeish should not be on the school board:

“ FAIRFAX COUNTY, Va. – Last month, here at Luther Jackson Middle School, parents gasped as a Fairfax County Public Schools board member, Abrar Omeish, stumbled through a clumsy speech and called the historic battle of Iwo Jima “evil,” even though the decisive victory by U.S. Marines led to eventual victory by Allied forces against Nazi Germany and its leader Adolph Hitler, ending the brutal genocide of Jews in the Holocaust. . .

Omeish, it would turn out, wasn’t concerned about failing schools or lifting lagging students up to standards. Her talk was about what she characterized as the lies of American public education, which she considered to be pro-Israel, anti-Palestinian. She spoke of a teacher fired from her position for promoting the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) movement, the controversial economic and political program—and cause célèbre of worldwide leftist organizations—that would pave the way for Palestinian statehood by crippling or destroying Israel economically.

Omeish started, “When we talk about the Palestinian issue, and it affects us deeply and families are affected, and we know how important it is to us.” Indeed, when she was a girl, in 2007, her father, Esam Omeish had resigned from a Virginia state commission that former governor Tim Kaine had named him to be a member, after a video emerged of him saying that pro-Palestinians had to pursue the “way of jihad” in opposing Israel.“

I am definitely voting for Paul in the hopes of restoring centrist, sane leadership to the FCPS Board.

Plus, I am a Dranesville voter (McLean) and my daughter tells me her school - McLean HS - is falling apart due to age and neglect by the current Board, superintendent, Gatehouse, etc. Paul will work to try to change that, while his opponent only represents the status quo who neglect McLean schools as “too privileged” to even maintain. The choice for us is obvious.

+1


Paul’s sole claim to fame is suing on behalf of right wing parents to repeal mask mandates at the point in the pandemic when kids couldn’t even get vaccinated. He’s a Covid denying right winger masquerading as Mr Little League. I’ll pass.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:On your website, you say:
"At-Large" School Board Candidates Who Have Similar Goals
You can vote for up to 3 "At-Large" School Board Candidates
CASSANDRA AUCOIN
MAUREEN BRODY
SAUNDRA DAVIS


Can you please explain how your goals are similar to Maureen Brody's goals?


Not Paul, but I'm amused by how you think this is such a "gotcha" moment.

Here are the main priorities on Brody's site (I'd never checked before):

* Refocus curriculum on fundamentals
* Improve low-performing schools
* Get spending under control
* Modernize school infrastructure

These priorities or goals seem sensible to me and I suspect they'd also seem sensible to many other parents if they took a look. And the fact that it's coming from someone who sent her kids to Lewis HS is a plus. Other social justice warriors in the county like Sujatha Hampton and VH sent their kids to Langley and Woodson, respectively.


So you do think that Maureen Brody and Paul Bartkowski are aligned?


I don't have a view as to whether they are "aligned." I'm not even sure what that means.

Is it like asking Robyn Lady whether she'd also invite LBGTQ teens who are having a dispute with their parents to come live with her and her partner, merely because one of her more vocal supporters has said he'd offer shelter in his home to LBGTQ teens in such circumstances?

By asking such a question, you attempt to imply that people with certain backgrounds or affiliations march in lock-step on every issue, and of course they don't. It's not a good look for you, nor does it serve the interests of the candidates you support.


That’s not a fair comparison at all.

Maureen Brody was endorsed by the Fairfax GOP at the same time they endorsed Paul Bartkowski. A question about who Paul supports and is aligned with is completely legitimate considering they will both appear on Republican sample ballots together.


Moderate centrist Megan McLaughlin was on the same democratic endorsed sample ballot as far left extremist activists Frisch and Omeish.

Most sample ballots and endorsements represent a spectrum of political opinions of their political party. It is pretty simplistic to pretend like this is some gotcha moment.

Thank you for educating the trolls. 😊


You missed the part where Paul Bartkowski actually endorses Maureen Brody as an at-large candidate on his website.

I guess when you don’t have any on-topic, intellectual points to discuss then you resort to name calling.


My sincere apologies if you are not a troll, but rather a genuine resident of the Dranesville district. I see your point and I will do my best to apply critical thinking skills instead to avoid going round in circles.

It’s evident that Paul Bartkowski is being put to a different standard than that of his opponent. Robin Lady is a Democrat and was endorsed by the same party that placed Abrar Omeish on the Board, to top it off, as an At-Large member! What does this say about R. Lady? Should she have declined the endorsement? For background information on Abrar Omeish:

https://asrainvestigates.substack.com/p/exclusive-abrar-omeish-at-fundraiser

While I’m not familiar with Maureen Brody, candidates like her on the board, independently of which party endorses them, will stand up to those who have been placed there to use and abuse our schools, our county, and our country, such is the case of Omeish. Robyn Lady, like the rest of her party, will continue to sit back while it happens, just like they did when Superintendent Reid bluntly sent the message, “Honestly, the majority doesn't always dictate, right?” to those who expressed their will through a survey, overwhelmingly opposing proposed changes that affected the entire community. Rest assured that if the need arose again, the likes of M. Brody will stand up to the Superintendent if she (along with the SB) disregard the will of the FCPS residents. And so will Paul Bartkowski, or any other candidate (endorsed by either party) that will place the needs of those he/she represents over party.




NP.

I opened that link and it is shocking. Someone as extreme and anti-Semitic as Omeish should not be on the school board:

“ FAIRFAX COUNTY, Va. – Last month, here at Luther Jackson Middle School, parents gasped as a Fairfax County Public Schools board member, Abrar Omeish, stumbled through a clumsy speech and called the historic battle of Iwo Jima “evil,” even though the decisive victory by U.S. Marines led to eventual victory by Allied forces against Nazi Germany and its leader Adolph Hitler, ending the brutal genocide of Jews in the Holocaust. . .

Omeish, it would turn out, wasn’t concerned about failing schools or lifting lagging students up to standards. Her talk was about what she characterized as the lies of American public education, which she considered to be pro-Israel, anti-Palestinian. She spoke of a teacher fired from her position for promoting the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) movement, the controversial economic and political program—and cause célèbre of worldwide leftist organizations—that would pave the way for Palestinian statehood by crippling or destroying Israel economically.

Omeish started, “When we talk about the Palestinian issue, and it affects us deeply and families are affected, and we know how important it is to us.” Indeed, when she was a girl, in 2007, her father, Esam Omeish had resigned from a Virginia state commission that former governor Tim Kaine had named him to be a member, after a video emerged of him saying that pro-Palestinians had to pursue the “way of jihad” in opposing Israel.“

I am definitely voting for Paul in the hopes of restoring centrist, sane leadership to the FCPS Board.

Plus, I am a Dranesville voter (McLean) and my daughter tells me her school - McLean HS - is falling apart due to age and neglect by the current Board, superintendent, Gatehouse, etc. Paul will work to try to change that, while his opponent only represents the status quo who neglect McLean schools as “too privileged” to even maintain. The choice for us is obvious.

+1


Paul’s sole claim to fame is suing on behalf of right wing parents to repeal mask mandates at the point in the pandemic when kids couldn’t even get vaccinated. He’s a Covid denying right winger masquerading as Mr Little League. I’ll pass.


As I understand he was not suing to repeal a mask mandate, but suing to require FCPS to comply with an existing state directive. The case became moot when FCPS opted to comply rather than get sanctioned by the courts.

FCPS functions poorly enough as it is. It can’t really take on the additional burden of defying state mandates as if it’s an independent state of its own. That’s not how counties are set up to function here.

As for Paul’s opponent she was a long time FCPS employee who is now retired and apparently wants to supplement her pension with $50K more from FCPS by also serving on the School Board. I admire her financial ambition but she brings absolutely nothing new to the table in terms of ideas or priorities.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:On your website, you say:
"At-Large" School Board Candidates Who Have Similar Goals
You can vote for up to 3 "At-Large" School Board Candidates
CASSANDRA AUCOIN
MAUREEN BRODY
SAUNDRA DAVIS


Can you please explain how your goals are similar to Maureen Brody's goals?


Not Paul, but I'm amused by how you think this is such a "gotcha" moment.

Here are the main priorities on Brody's site (I'd never checked before):

* Refocus curriculum on fundamentals
* Improve low-performing schools
* Get spending under control
* Modernize school infrastructure

These priorities or goals seem sensible to me and I suspect they'd also seem sensible to many other parents if they took a look. And the fact that it's coming from someone who sent her kids to Lewis HS is a plus. Other social justice warriors in the county like Sujatha Hampton and VH sent their kids to Langley and Woodson, respectively.


So you do think that Maureen Brody and Paul Bartkowski are aligned?


I don't have a view as to whether they are "aligned." I'm not even sure what that means.

Is it like asking Robyn Lady whether she'd also invite LBGTQ teens who are having a dispute with their parents to come live with her and her partner, merely because one of her more vocal supporters has said he'd offer shelter in his home to LBGTQ teens in such circumstances?

By asking such a question, you attempt to imply that people with certain backgrounds or affiliations march in lock-step on every issue, and of course they don't. It's not a good look for you, nor does it serve the interests of the candidates you support.


That’s not a fair comparison at all.

Maureen Brody was endorsed by the Fairfax GOP at the same time they endorsed Paul Bartkowski. A question about who Paul supports and is aligned with is completely legitimate considering they will both appear on Republican sample ballots together.


Moderate centrist Megan McLaughlin was on the same democratic endorsed sample ballot as far left extremist activists Frisch and Omeish.

Most sample ballots and endorsements represent a spectrum of political opinions of their political party. It is pretty simplistic to pretend like this is some gotcha moment.

Thank you for educating the trolls. 😊


You missed the part where Paul Bartkowski actually endorses Maureen Brody as an at-large candidate on his website.

I guess when you don’t have any on-topic, intellectual points to discuss then you resort to name calling.


My sincere apologies if you are not a troll, but rather a genuine resident of the Dranesville district. I see your point and I will do my best to apply critical thinking skills instead to avoid going round in circles.

It’s evident that Paul Bartkowski is being put to a different standard than that of his opponent. Robin Lady is a Democrat and was endorsed by the same party that placed Abrar Omeish on the Board, to top it off, as an At-Large member! What does this say about R. Lady? Should she have declined the endorsement? For background information on Abrar Omeish:

https://asrainvestigates.substack.com/p/exclusive-abrar-omeish-at-fundraiser

While I’m not familiar with Maureen Brody, candidates like her on the board, independently of which party endorses them, will stand up to those who have been placed there to use and abuse our schools, our county, and our country, such is the case of Omeish. Robyn Lady, like the rest of her party, will continue to sit back while it happens, just like they did when Superintendent Reid bluntly sent the message, “Honestly, the majority doesn't always dictate, right?” to those who expressed their will through a survey, overwhelmingly opposing proposed changes that affected the entire community. Rest assured that if the need arose again, the likes of M. Brody will stand up to the Superintendent if she (along with the SB) disregard the will of the FCPS residents. And so will Paul Bartkowski, or any other candidate (endorsed by either party) that will place the needs of those he/she represents over party.




NP.

I opened that link and it is shocking. Someone as extreme and anti-Semitic as Omeish should not be on the school board:

“ FAIRFAX COUNTY, Va. – Last month, here at Luther Jackson Middle School, parents gasped as a Fairfax County Public Schools board member, Abrar Omeish, stumbled through a clumsy speech and called the historic battle of Iwo Jima “evil,” even though the decisive victory by U.S. Marines led to eventual victory by Allied forces against Nazi Germany and its leader Adolph Hitler, ending the brutal genocide of Jews in the Holocaust. . .

Omeish, it would turn out, wasn’t concerned about failing schools or lifting lagging students up to standards. Her talk was about what she characterized as the lies of American public education, which she considered to be pro-Israel, anti-Palestinian. She spoke of a teacher fired from her position for promoting the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) movement, the controversial economic and political program—and cause célèbre of worldwide leftist organizations—that would pave the way for Palestinian statehood by crippling or destroying Israel economically.

Omeish started, “When we talk about the Palestinian issue, and it affects us deeply and families are affected, and we know how important it is to us.” Indeed, when she was a girl, in 2007, her father, Esam Omeish had resigned from a Virginia state commission that former governor Tim Kaine had named him to be a member, after a video emerged of him saying that pro-Palestinians had to pursue the “way of jihad” in opposing Israel.“

I am definitely voting for Paul in the hopes of restoring centrist, sane leadership to the FCPS Board.

Plus, I am a Dranesville voter (McLean) and my daughter tells me her school - McLean HS - is falling apart due to age and neglect by the current Board, superintendent, Gatehouse, etc. Paul will work to try to change that, while his opponent only represents the status quo who neglect McLean schools as “too privileged” to even maintain. The choice for us is obvious.

+1


Paul’s sole claim to fame is suing on behalf of right wing parents to repeal mask mandates at the point in the pandemic when kids couldn’t even get vaccinated. He’s a Covid denying right winger masquerading as Mr Little League. I’ll pass.


As I understand he was not suing to repeal a mask mandate, but suing to require FCPS to comply with an existing state directive. The case became moot when FCPS opted to comply rather than get sanctioned by the courts.

FCPS functions poorly enough as it is. It can’t really take on the additional burden of defying state mandates as if it’s an independent state of its own. That’s not how counties are set up to function here.

As for Paul’s opponent she was a long time FCPS employee who is now retired and apparently wants to supplement her pension with $50K more from FCPS by also serving on the School Board. I admire her financial ambition but she brings absolutely nothing new to the table in terms of ideas or priorities.


I’m not sure I understand. Are you saying only people who don’t draw pensions or those who don’t have an income should serve on the SB? Couldn’t you say that about anyone who currently holds a job and serves on the school board? You could say they only want to supplement their salary.
Anonymous
I’d like to see more parents on the School Board. Voting for Paul.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:On your website, you say:
"At-Large" School Board Candidates Who Have Similar Goals
You can vote for up to 3 "At-Large" School Board Candidates
CASSANDRA AUCOIN
MAUREEN BRODY
SAUNDRA DAVIS


Can you please explain how your goals are similar to Maureen Brody's goals?


Not Paul, but I'm amused by how you think this is such a "gotcha" moment.

Here are the main priorities on Brody's site (I'd never checked before):

* Refocus curriculum on fundamentals
* Improve low-performing schools
* Get spending under control
* Modernize school infrastructure

These priorities or goals seem sensible to me and I suspect they'd also seem sensible to many other parents if they took a look. And the fact that it's coming from someone who sent her kids to Lewis HS is a plus. Other social justice warriors in the county like Sujatha Hampton and VH sent their kids to Langley and Woodson, respectively.


So you do think that Maureen Brody and Paul Bartkowski are aligned?


I don't have a view as to whether they are "aligned." I'm not even sure what that means.

Is it like asking Robyn Lady whether she'd also invite LBGTQ teens who are having a dispute with their parents to come live with her and her partner, merely because one of her more vocal supporters has said he'd offer shelter in his home to LBGTQ teens in such circumstances?

By asking such a question, you attempt to imply that people with certain backgrounds or affiliations march in lock-step on every issue, and of course they don't. It's not a good look for you, nor does it serve the interests of the candidates you support.


That’s not a fair comparison at all.

Maureen Brody was endorsed by the Fairfax GOP at the same time they endorsed Paul Bartkowski. A question about who Paul supports and is aligned with is completely legitimate considering they will both appear on Republican sample ballots together.


Moderate centrist Megan McLaughlin was on the same democratic endorsed sample ballot as far left extremist activists Frisch and Omeish.

Most sample ballots and endorsements represent a spectrum of political opinions of their political party. It is pretty simplistic to pretend like this is some gotcha moment.

Thank you for educating the trolls. 😊


You missed the part where Paul Bartkowski actually endorses Maureen Brody as an at-large candidate on his website.

I guess when you don’t have any on-topic, intellectual points to discuss then you resort to name calling.


My sincere apologies if you are not a troll, but rather a genuine resident of the Dranesville district. I see your point and I will do my best to apply critical thinking skills instead to avoid going round in circles.

It’s evident that Paul Bartkowski is being put to a different standard than that of his opponent. Robin Lady is a Democrat and was endorsed by the same party that placed Abrar Omeish on the Board, to top it off, as an At-Large member! What does this say about R. Lady? Should she have declined the endorsement? For background information on Abrar Omeish:

https://asrainvestigates.substack.com/p/exclusive-abrar-omeish-at-fundraiser

While I’m not familiar with Maureen Brody, candidates like her on the board, independently of which party endorses them, will stand up to those who have been placed there to use and abuse our schools, our county, and our country, such is the case of Omeish. Robyn Lady, like the rest of her party, will continue to sit back while it happens, just like they did when Superintendent Reid bluntly sent the message, “Honestly, the majority doesn't always dictate, right?” to those who expressed their will through a survey, overwhelmingly opposing proposed changes that affected the entire community. Rest assured that if the need arose again, the likes of M. Brody will stand up to the Superintendent if she (along with the SB) disregard the will of the FCPS residents. And so will Paul Bartkowski, or any other candidate (endorsed by either party) that will place the needs of those he/she represents over party.




NP.

I opened that link and it is shocking. Someone as extreme and anti-Semitic as Omeish should not be on the school board:

“ FAIRFAX COUNTY, Va. – Last month, here at Luther Jackson Middle School, parents gasped as a Fairfax County Public Schools board member, Abrar Omeish, stumbled through a clumsy speech and called the historic battle of Iwo Jima “evil,” even though the decisive victory by U.S. Marines led to eventual victory by Allied forces against Nazi Germany and its leader Adolph Hitler, ending the brutal genocide of Jews in the Holocaust. . .

Omeish, it would turn out, wasn’t concerned about failing schools or lifting lagging students up to standards. Her talk was about what she characterized as the lies of American public education, which she considered to be pro-Israel, anti-Palestinian. She spoke of a teacher fired from her position for promoting the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) movement, the controversial economic and political program—and cause célèbre of worldwide leftist organizations—that would pave the way for Palestinian statehood by crippling or destroying Israel economically.

Omeish started, “When we talk about the Palestinian issue, and it affects us deeply and families are affected, and we know how important it is to us.” Indeed, when she was a girl, in 2007, her father, Esam Omeish had resigned from a Virginia state commission that former governor Tim Kaine had named him to be a member, after a video emerged of him saying that pro-Palestinians had to pursue the “way of jihad” in opposing Israel.“

I am definitely voting for Paul in the hopes of restoring centrist, sane leadership to the FCPS Board.

Plus, I am a Dranesville voter (McLean) and my daughter tells me her school - McLean HS - is falling apart due to age and neglect by the current Board, superintendent, Gatehouse, etc. Paul will work to try to change that, while his opponent only represents the status quo who neglect McLean schools as “too privileged” to even maintain. The choice for us is obvious.

+1


Paul’s sole claim to fame is suing on behalf of right wing parents to repeal mask mandates at the point in the pandemic when kids couldn’t even get vaccinated. He’s a Covid denying right winger masquerading as Mr Little League. I’ll pass.


As I understand he was not suing to repeal a mask mandate, but suing to require FCPS to comply with an existing state directive. The case became moot when FCPS opted to comply rather than get sanctioned by the courts.

FCPS functions poorly enough as it is. It can’t really take on the additional burden of defying state mandates as if it’s an independent state of its own. That’s not how counties are set up to function here.

As for Paul’s opponent she was a long time FCPS employee who is now retired and apparently wants to supplement her pension with $50K more from FCPS by also serving on the School Board. I admire her financial ambition but she brings absolutely nothing new to the table in terms of ideas or priorities.


I have no issue compensating school board. But I just don't think Robyn is a good fit, at least for now. I went to two candidate forums recently. Robyn stands with the current school board on every policy/item the hosts and audience asked about. She failed to convince me that she would make any improvement.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:On your website, you say:
"At-Large" School Board Candidates Who Have Similar Goals
You can vote for up to 3 "At-Large" School Board Candidates
CASSANDRA AUCOIN
MAUREEN BRODY
SAUNDRA DAVIS


Can you please explain how your goals are similar to Maureen Brody's goals?


Not Paul, but I'm amused by how you think this is such a "gotcha" moment.

Here are the main priorities on Brody's site (I'd never checked before):

* Refocus curriculum on fundamentals
* Improve low-performing schools
* Get spending under control
* Modernize school infrastructure

These priorities or goals seem sensible to me and I suspect they'd also seem sensible to many other parents if they took a look. And the fact that it's coming from someone who sent her kids to Lewis HS is a plus. Other social justice warriors in the county like Sujatha Hampton and VH sent their kids to Langley and Woodson, respectively.


So you do think that Maureen Brody and Paul Bartkowski are aligned?


I don't have a view as to whether they are "aligned." I'm not even sure what that means.

Is it like asking Robyn Lady whether she'd also invite LBGTQ teens who are having a dispute with their parents to come live with her and her partner, merely because one of her more vocal supporters has said he'd offer shelter in his home to LBGTQ teens in such circumstances?

By asking such a question, you attempt to imply that people with certain backgrounds or affiliations march in lock-step on every issue, and of course they don't. It's not a good look for you, nor does it serve the interests of the candidates you support.


That’s not a fair comparison at all.

Maureen Brody was endorsed by the Fairfax GOP at the same time they endorsed Paul Bartkowski. A question about who Paul supports and is aligned with is completely legitimate considering they will both appear on Republican sample ballots together.


Moderate centrist Megan McLaughlin was on the same democratic endorsed sample ballot as far left extremist activists Frisch and Omeish.

Most sample ballots and endorsements represent a spectrum of political opinions of their political party. It is pretty simplistic to pretend like this is some gotcha moment.

Thank you for educating the trolls. 😊


You missed the part where Paul Bartkowski actually endorses Maureen Brody as an at-large candidate on his website.

I guess when you don’t have any on-topic, intellectual points to discuss then you resort to name calling.


My sincere apologies if you are not a troll, but rather a genuine resident of the Dranesville district. I see your point and I will do my best to apply critical thinking skills instead to avoid going round in circles.

It’s evident that Paul Bartkowski is being put to a different standard than that of his opponent. Robin Lady is a Democrat and was endorsed by the same party that placed Abrar Omeish on the Board, to top it off, as an At-Large member! What does this say about R. Lady? Should she have declined the endorsement? For background information on Abrar Omeish:

https://asrainvestigates.substack.com/p/exclusive-abrar-omeish-at-fundraiser

While I’m not familiar with Maureen Brody, candidates like her on the board, independently of which party endorses them, will stand up to those who have been placed there to use and abuse our schools, our county, and our country, such is the case of Omeish. Robyn Lady, like the rest of her party, will continue to sit back while it happens, just like they did when Superintendent Reid bluntly sent the message, “Honestly, the majority doesn't always dictate, right?” to those who expressed their will through a survey, overwhelmingly opposing proposed changes that affected the entire community. Rest assured that if the need arose again, the likes of M. Brody will stand up to the Superintendent if she (along with the SB) disregard the will of the FCPS residents. And so will Paul Bartkowski, or any other candidate (endorsed by either party) that will place the needs of those he/she represents over party.




NP.

I opened that link and it is shocking. Someone as extreme and anti-Semitic as Omeish should not be on the school board:

“ FAIRFAX COUNTY, Va. – Last month, here at Luther Jackson Middle School, parents gasped as a Fairfax County Public Schools board member, Abrar Omeish, stumbled through a clumsy speech and called the historic battle of Iwo Jima “evil,” even though the decisive victory by U.S. Marines led to eventual victory by Allied forces against Nazi Germany and its leader Adolph Hitler, ending the brutal genocide of Jews in the Holocaust. . .

Omeish, it would turn out, wasn’t concerned about failing schools or lifting lagging students up to standards. Her talk was about what she characterized as the lies of American public education, which she considered to be pro-Israel, anti-Palestinian. She spoke of a teacher fired from her position for promoting the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) movement, the controversial economic and political program—and cause célèbre of worldwide leftist organizations—that would pave the way for Palestinian statehood by crippling or destroying Israel economically.

Omeish started, “When we talk about the Palestinian issue, and it affects us deeply and families are affected, and we know how important it is to us.” Indeed, when she was a girl, in 2007, her father, Esam Omeish had resigned from a Virginia state commission that former governor Tim Kaine had named him to be a member, after a video emerged of him saying that pro-Palestinians had to pursue the “way of jihad” in opposing Israel.“

I am definitely voting for Paul in the hopes of restoring centrist, sane leadership to the FCPS Board.

Plus, I am a Dranesville voter (McLean) and my daughter tells me her school - McLean HS - is falling apart due to age and neglect by the current Board, superintendent, Gatehouse, etc. Paul will work to try to change that, while his opponent only represents the status quo who neglect McLean schools as “too privileged” to even maintain. The choice for us is obvious.

+1


Paul’s sole claim to fame is suing on behalf of right wing parents to repeal mask mandates at the point in the pandemic when kids couldn’t even get vaccinated. He’s a Covid denying right winger masquerading as Mr Little League. I’ll pass.


As I understand he was not suing to repeal a mask mandate, but suing to require FCPS to comply with an existing state directive. The case became moot when FCPS opted to comply rather than get sanctioned by the courts.

FCPS functions poorly enough as it is. It can’t really take on the additional burden of defying state mandates as if it’s an independent state of its own. That’s not how counties are set up to function here.

As for Paul’s opponent she was a long time FCPS employee who is now retired and apparently wants to supplement her pension with $50K more from FCPS by also serving on the School Board. I admire her financial ambition but she brings absolutely nothing new to the table in terms of ideas or priorities.


I have no issue compensating school board. But I just don't think Robyn is a good fit, at least for now. I went to two candidate forums recently. Robyn stands with the current school board on every policy/item the hosts and audience asked about. She failed to convince me that she would make any improvement.



+1. Robyn is pleasant enough and I understand why someone who has retired in their early 60s might feel they still can make a contribution. But she has no sense of urgency about addressing any of the challenges within Dranesville. After Strauss and Tholen, we need someone who’ll fight for our district. Lady won’t; it will just be like having another at-large member who doesn’t rock the boat.
Anonymous
I didn't know anything about PB before reading this forum, and as a moderate Herndon parent of 3 current students, I was undecided about the Dranesville SB race until now. Here are the reasons that I will NOT be voting for you on election day:

1. I am turned off by your lack of knowledge base on statements that you claim as truth. Case in point, you mention that SEL questions asked of 8th graders include questions about number of sexual partners. This was incorrect and when it was shown to you, you admitted that the list of questions was provided to you by a "concerned parent." Instead of confirming this information and learning that that set of questions is part of the Monitoring the Future study which has been conducted through Federal grants since 1975 with 8th, 10th and 12th graders to assess attitudes, behaviors and trends of risk behaviors among our nations' teens, you just blindly accepted what you are told. Bad form.

2. Your push on the renovation at McLean. You come off as a candidate who has one personal agenda to get what you want for your own kids and neighbors. Your comments about the SB taking McLean residents' copious tax dollars to spend elsewhere reeks of entitlement. BTW, despite overcrowding and an old building McLean still ranks as one of the best high schools in the state. They are clearly not suffering that much.

3. Speaking of entitlement, your positions on book banning, trans students and just getting back to reading writing and math also reek of wealthy entitlement. The reason that it is necessary for our schools to do so much work outside of traditional subject matters is that we have students who face significant barriers to learning that must be overcome before they can achieve their best. Not every student has a stable home life, or parents who have the capacity to support them, or strong English language skills, or the ability to pay for tutors to help them pass a class or take the SAT. Some struggle with identity issues, mental health issues, anxiety, stress, and more and these issues bleed into the classroom. Assuming that all children have the home resources to solve these issues is elitist. It is not as simple as "that stuff should be taught at home," or "parental rights." For many kids, this doesn't exist.

So thank you for opening this forum and sharing who you are. You have helped this voter make up my mind.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I didn't know anything about PB before reading this forum, and as a moderate Herndon parent of 3 current students, I was undecided about the Dranesville SB race until now. Here are the reasons that I will NOT be voting for you on election day:

1. I am turned off by your lack of knowledge base on statements that you claim as truth. Case in point, you mention that SEL questions asked of 8th graders include questions about number of sexual partners. This was incorrect and when it was shown to you, you admitted that the list of questions was provided to you by a "concerned parent." Instead of confirming this information and learning that that set of questions is part of the Monitoring the Future study which has been conducted through Federal grants since 1975 with 8th, 10th and 12th graders to assess attitudes, behaviors and trends of risk behaviors among our nations' teens, you just blindly accepted what you are told. Bad form.

2. Your push on the renovation at McLean. You come off as a candidate who has one personal agenda to get what you want for your own kids and neighbors. Your comments about the SB taking McLean residents' copious tax dollars to spend elsewhere reeks of entitlement. BTW, despite overcrowding and an old building McLean still ranks as one of the best high schools in the state. They are clearly not suffering that much.

3. Speaking of entitlement, your positions on book banning, trans students and just getting back to reading writing and math also reek of wealthy entitlement. The reason that it is necessary for our schools to do so much work outside of traditional subject matters is that we have students who face significant barriers to learning that must be overcome before they can achieve their best. Not every student has a stable home life, or parents who have the capacity to support them, or strong English language skills, or the ability to pay for tutors to help them pass a class or take the SAT. Some struggle with identity issues, mental health issues, anxiety, stress, and more and these issues bleed into the classroom. Assuming that all children have the home resources to solve these issues is elitist. It is not as simple as "that stuff should be taught at home," or "parental rights." For many kids, this doesn't exist.

So thank you for opening this forum and sharing who you are. You have helped this voter make up my mind.


So Herndon HS is now fully renovated and half the elementary schools in the pyramid are getting major renovations, but Paul should be criticized for pointing out that McLean HS has been neglected and has an inferior and inadequate facility?

There’s also an inconsistency between claim king he has “one personal agenda” but then criticizing his position on other, unrelated issues.

I can understand someone from Herndon wanting a Herndon resident (Lady) on the School Board after representatives from McLean and Great Falls, but your post sounds like something written by an FCDC insider who is just pretending to characterize themselves as a “moderate” to try and appeal to swing voters.

Lady will be just another rubber-stamp, business-as-usual Democrat who’ll allow other School Board members to run roughshod over most Dranesville schools because of some positive schools rankings that they spend the rest of their time trying to discredit.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:On your website, you say:
"At-Large" School Board Candidates Who Have Similar Goals
You can vote for up to 3 "At-Large" School Board Candidates
CASSANDRA AUCOIN
MAUREEN BRODY
SAUNDRA DAVIS


Can you please explain how your goals are similar to Maureen Brody's goals?


Not Paul, but I'm amused by how you think this is such a "gotcha" moment.

Here are the main priorities on Brody's site (I'd never checked before):

* Refocus curriculum on fundamentals
* Improve low-performing schools
* Get spending under control
* Modernize school infrastructure

These priorities or goals seem sensible to me and I suspect they'd also seem sensible to many other parents if they took a look. And the fact that it's coming from someone who sent her kids to Lewis HS is a plus. Other social justice warriors in the county like Sujatha Hampton and VH sent their kids to Langley and Woodson, respectively.


So you do think that Maureen Brody and Paul Bartkowski are aligned?


I don't have a view as to whether they are "aligned." I'm not even sure what that means.

Is it like asking Robyn Lady whether she'd also invite LBGTQ teens who are having a dispute with their parents to come live with her and her partner, merely because one of her more vocal supporters has said he'd offer shelter in his home to LBGTQ teens in such circumstances?

By asking such a question, you attempt to imply that people with certain backgrounds or affiliations march in lock-step on every issue, and of course they don't. It's not a good look for you, nor does it serve the interests of the candidates you support.


That’s not a fair comparison at all.

Maureen Brody was endorsed by the Fairfax GOP at the same time they endorsed Paul Bartkowski. A question about who Paul supports and is aligned with is completely legitimate considering they will both appear on Republican sample ballots together.


Moderate centrist Megan McLaughlin was on the same democratic endorsed sample ballot as far left extremist activists Frisch and Omeish.

Most sample ballots and endorsements represent a spectrum of political opinions of their political party. It is pretty simplistic to pretend like this is some gotcha moment.

Thank you for educating the trolls. 😊


You missed the part where Paul Bartkowski actually endorses Maureen Brody as an at-large candidate on his website.

I guess when you don’t have any on-topic, intellectual points to discuss then you resort to name calling.


My sincere apologies if you are not a troll, but rather a genuine resident of the Dranesville district. I see your point and I will do my best to apply critical thinking skills instead to avoid going round in circles.

It’s evident that Paul Bartkowski is being put to a different standard than that of his opponent. Robin Lady is a Democrat and was endorsed by the same party that placed Abrar Omeish on the Board, to top it off, as an At-Large member! What does this say about R. Lady? Should she have declined the endorsement? For background information on Abrar Omeish:

https://asrainvestigates.substack.com/p/exclusive-abrar-omeish-at-fundraiser

While I’m not familiar with Maureen Brody, candidates like her on the board, independently of which party endorses them, will stand up to those who have been placed there to use and abuse our schools, our county, and our country, such is the case of Omeish. Robyn Lady, like the rest of her party, will continue to sit back while it happens, just like they did when Superintendent Reid bluntly sent the message, “Honestly, the majority doesn't always dictate, right?” to those who expressed their will through a survey, overwhelmingly opposing proposed changes that affected the entire community. Rest assured that if the need arose again, the likes of M. Brody will stand up to the Superintendent if she (along with the SB) disregard the will of the FCPS residents. And so will Paul Bartkowski, or any other candidate (endorsed by either party) that will place the needs of those he/she represents over party.




NP.

I opened that link and it is shocking. Someone as extreme and anti-Semitic as Omeish should not be on the school board:

“ FAIRFAX COUNTY, Va. – Last month, here at Luther Jackson Middle School, parents gasped as a Fairfax County Public Schools board member, Abrar Omeish, stumbled through a clumsy speech and called the historic battle of Iwo Jima “evil,” even though the decisive victory by U.S. Marines led to eventual victory by Allied forces against Nazi Germany and its leader Adolph Hitler, ending the brutal genocide of Jews in the Holocaust. . .

Omeish, it would turn out, wasn’t concerned about failing schools or lifting lagging students up to standards. Her talk was about what she characterized as the lies of American public education, which she considered to be pro-Israel, anti-Palestinian. She spoke of a teacher fired from her position for promoting the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) movement, the controversial economic and political program—and cause célèbre of worldwide leftist organizations—that would pave the way for Palestinian statehood by crippling or destroying Israel economically.

Omeish started, “When we talk about the Palestinian issue, and it affects us deeply and families are affected, and we know how important it is to us.” Indeed, when she was a girl, in 2007, her father, Esam Omeish had resigned from a Virginia state commission that former governor Tim Kaine had named him to be a member, after a video emerged of him saying that pro-Palestinians had to pursue the “way of jihad” in opposing Israel.“

I am definitely voting for Paul in the hopes of restoring centrist, sane leadership to the FCPS Board.

Plus, I am a Dranesville voter (McLean) and my daughter tells me her school - McLean HS - is falling apart due to age and neglect by the current Board, superintendent, Gatehouse, etc. Paul will work to try to change that, while his opponent only represents the status quo who neglect McLean schools as “too privileged” to even maintain. The choice for us is obvious.

+1


Paul’s sole claim to fame is suing on behalf of right wing parents to repeal mask mandates at the point in the pandemic when kids couldn’t even get vaccinated. He’s a Covid denying right winger masquerading as Mr Little League. I’ll pass.


As I understand he was not suing to repeal a mask mandate, but suing to require FCPS to comply with an existing state directive. The case became moot when FCPS opted to comply rather than get sanctioned by the courts.

FCPS functions poorly enough as it is. It can’t really take on the additional burden of defying state mandates as if it’s an independent state of its own. That’s not how counties are set up to function here.

As for Paul’s opponent she was a long time FCPS employee who is now retired and apparently wants to supplement her pension with $50K more from FCPS by also serving on the School Board. I admire her financial ambition but she brings absolutely nothing new to the table in terms of ideas or priorities.


+1
Happy with the status quo? Vote for Robyn Lady. I will be voting for Paul Bartkowski.
Anonymous


2. Your push on the renovation at McLean. You come off as a candidate who has one personal agenda to get what you want for your own kids and neighbors. Your comments about the SB taking McLean residents' copious tax dollars to spend elsewhere reeks of entitlement. BTW, despite overcrowding and an old building McLean still ranks as one of the best high schools in the state. They are clearly not suffering that much.

This hypocritical post is almost enough to make me vote for Bartkowski despite substantial reservations about his stance on academic freedom. Why is it equitable that McLean has horrible facilities and is routinely excluded from the renovation queue? Why do people like you think McLean students should be treated worse than everyone else?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I didn't know anything about PB before reading this forum, and as a moderate Herndon parent of 3 current students, I was undecided about the Dranesville SB race until now. Here are the reasons that I will NOT be voting for you on election day:

1. I am turned off by your lack of knowledge base on statements that you claim as truth. Case in point, you mention that SEL questions asked of 8th graders include questions about number of sexual partners. This was incorrect and when it was shown to you, you admitted that the list of questions was provided to you by a "concerned parent." Instead of confirming this information and learning that that set of questions is part of the Monitoring the Future study which has been conducted through Federal grants since 1975 with 8th, 10th and 12th graders to assess attitudes, behaviors and trends of risk behaviors among our nations' teens, you just blindly accepted what you are told. Bad form.

2. Your push on the renovation at McLean. You come off as a candidate who has one personal agenda to get what you want for your own kids and neighbors. Your comments about the SB taking McLean residents' copious tax dollars to spend elsewhere reeks of entitlement. BTW, despite overcrowding and an old building McLean still ranks as one of the best high schools in the state. They are clearly not suffering that much.

3. Speaking of entitlement, your positions on book banning, trans students and just getting back to reading writing and math also reek of wealthy entitlement. The reason that it is necessary for our schools to do so much work outside of traditional subject matters is that we have students who face significant barriers to learning that must be overcome before they can achieve their best. Not every student has a stable home life, or parents who have the capacity to support them, or strong English language skills, or the ability to pay for tutors to help them pass a class or take the SAT. Some struggle with identity issues, mental health issues, anxiety, stress, and more and these issues bleed into the classroom. Assuming that all children have the home resources to solve these issues is elitist. It is not as simple as "that stuff should be taught at home," or "parental rights." For many kids, this doesn't exist.

So thank you for opening this forum and sharing who you are. You have helped this voter make up my mind.


And you have helped this voter make up my mind. In no way will I vote for someone who represents all of things you list. We already have 12 people on the SB who are laser focused on all of your pet social issues. No thank you. Enough. I'll be voting for Bartkowski.
Anonymous
Why didn't you respond to the questions sent to all the candidates by SEPTA? It is a very involved group that represents and assists many students, teachers and parents. Not responding at all really shows a disinterest in special needs kids.
Anonymous
Complaining that rich people pay a lot of taxes and somehow are more deserving of a renovated building than other neighborhoods in the county is frankly tone deaf and gross.

You can advocate for a school to be moved up in the renovation queue because it desperately needs renovations (whether it needs them more than other schools, I have no idea). Tying renovations to McLean's tax base is unnecessary and makes you seem really out of touch.
Forum Index » Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)
Go to: