Lock him up indictment FL

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:1) he isn't locked up, just indicted
2) rule of law is important
3) anyone defending Trump this time next week is like complicit to some degree with his carious crimes



So regarding number three, should there be a sweep and camps and stuff?


Josh Harley attended Yale and Stanford. Funny he is so dumb and why do people clamor to send their kids to schools that churn out the dregs of society?



Josh Hawley — my autocorrect went crazy.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The espionage act doesn't apply to the Commander In Chief, either in office or after leaving office. In the 106 years since enacted, it was never used against a President or candidate until yesterday.



Well we have never had a president as bad as trump.


+1. All laws apply to former presidents. Which is how we differ from a Bananna Republic. Nothing in the Espionage Act excludes him. He also can’t drive drunk or shoot someone on 5th Avenue. It’s just no former POTUS has been a stupid and corrupt as Trump.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Clearly political



What a dumbass! JFC
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The espionage act doesn't apply to the Commander In Chief, either in office or after leaving office. In the 106 years since enacted, it was never used against a President or candidate until yesterday.


“Former President” is not a category under the law. He’s just a citizen.


Stupid people be stupid
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Bottom of the barrel trolls today. You can tell how bad it is when the good trolls won’t even bother.


Russia isn’t sending their best and brightest.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The espionage act doesn't apply to the Commander In Chief, either in office or after leaving office. In the 106 years since enacted, it was never used against a President or candidate until yesterday.





He reads EVERYTHING. Please.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The indictment is online at NYtimes and it’s nuts. This mofo kept these secrets in a shower and on stage at Maralgo.

This photo is even worse than the shower and ballroom ones IMO.


OMG - photos and newspapers. Hang him high
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Clearly political


Talk about missing the point of classified records laws


+1. Missing top secret documents? No biggie, tell the intern to print out another dozen copies, since more are bound to be misplaced.

I mean….. YIKES,
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Clearly political



Because that's not a point. Trump, with copies in hand, can show the information to enemies of the state. No unauthorized user is suppose to keep copies. He is an unautharized user. He's on tape showing a classified doc to other unauthorized people, post-presidency.

HOW DUMB ARE YOU? DUMBER THAN THAT IDIOT YOU QUOTED, AT ANY RATE!


Republicans are incapable of logical reasoning. A printed copy of a classified document is a classified document. He can’t keep it. It doesn’t matter that there is another copy at the Archives. It isn’t a document for the dumbass former guy to keep in his country club to show off to whomever wants to listen to his bullshit.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The indictment is online at NYtimes and it’s nuts. This mofo kept these secrets in a shower and on stage at Maralgo.

This photo is even worse than the shower and ballroom ones IMO.


OMG - photos and newspapers. Hang him high

Hi again! Are you still trying to argue the boxes didn’t contain classified documents, despite the fact the Trump turned several over and that more were found during the raid?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I guess confirms the stories that Trump spent a lot of time in the bathroom.





I see lots of boxes. One is marked BEDROOM. OHMYGOD, my X-ray vision tells me those are all classified

I’d suggest you read the indictment but I’m not sure you could understand it.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The indictment is online at NYtimes and it’s nuts. This mofo kept these secrets in a shower and on stage at Maralgo.

This photo is even worse than the shower and ballroom ones IMO.

Jesus; what a dump.


I agree



The people here are too evil and crooked to even care.


Even you guys aren’t stupid enough to think the cases are similar.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The indictment is online at NYtimes and it’s nuts. This mofo kept these secrets in a shower and on stage at Maralgo.

This photo is even worse than the shower and ballroom ones IMO.


OMG - photos and newspapers. Hang him high

Hi again! Are you still trying to argue the boxes didn’t contain classified documents, despite the fact the Trump turned several over and that more were found during the raid?

The GOP’s mental house of cards is collapsing and they’re really struggling.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The indictment is online at NYtimes and it’s nuts. This mofo kept these secrets in a shower and on stage at Maralgo.

This photo is even worse than the shower and ballroom ones IMO.


OMG - photos and newspapers. Hang him high

Hi again! Are you still trying to argue the boxes didn’t contain classified documents, despite the fact the Trump turned several over and that more were found during the raid?

The GOP’s mental house of cards is collapsing and they’re really struggling.

Poor dears
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:But Hilary’s emails!!!!


The ones that foreign enemies now have after breaking into her unsecured server? Those?

No one broke into her server.


You are incorrect.


Prove it!


https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/07/us/hillary-clintons-email-was-probably-hacked-experts-say.html

https://apnews.com/article/1a737240cf144c728b45ef64e181f19d

https://www.thedailybeast.com/fbi-hints-that-hillary-clintons-private-server-got-hacked


post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: