The Tucker Carlson videos are dropping

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They arrested and jailed that guy for being escorted throughout the Capitol by the police. There’s something seriously wrong with all of this.

I know. What reasonable person WOULDN’T think he was just taking a tour in that environment. /s/

JFC dude.

Doesn’t matter. If an officer is escorting you around, it’s reasonable to think it’s all ok.

Uh, no, if you break into a building and a police officer follows you but does not tackle you, that doesn't make it okay.

Reasonable? Are you 10?

So you maintain the officer knew he broke the law and was simply following him, knowing there were cameras everywhere?

Maintain what? He was arrested, charged, and convicted. All without being tackled!

That's how our system works.

Again, if the evidence was withheld, no, it’s not how our system works. That video should have been handed to the defense by prosecution.

The videos that Carlson showed were shown to the defense and the prosecution. He didn't put up new stuff - he hasn't gone through 44,000 hours of videos to find any gotcha stuff because that's a tremendous amount of footage and the gotcha footage has already been by the J6 committee.

The prosecution, with their many, many lawyers, knew that video existed and deliberately withheld it from defense.

What is your evidence that anything relevant was withheld?

Crickets....

Was it presented at trial to the jury?

So you have no evidence at all for your wild accusations.

It was not. Can you provide evidence that video was shown to the jury please?

I don't know what video you are talking about. There are lots of reasons a video might be not be shown to a jury. Defense counsel may not have wanted to. Or maybe they didn't find it. Or maybe the judge ruled it was not admissible. Even if this video that you haven't identified wasn't shown to the jury, it doesn't mean it wasn't made available to defense counsel.

The video of multiple police officers with the Shaman and him praying for them. The one Tucker showed. Can you prove that it was shown to the jury, yes or no.

There is no jury when you plead guilty, dipshit

Did the Judge see it? Did the Shaman’s attorney?

You have presented no evidence that they didn’t.

[Anonymous]

What happened to Tucker Carlson? He used to appear normal and level headed. Years ago I remember watching him and liking him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Mostly peaceful protestors.

Who aren’t being prosecuted.

[Anonymous]

Shaman lawyer says didn’t get the evidence

https://www.newsmax.com/amp/politics/jan-6-prostestor-lawyer/2023/03/07/id/1111475/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Shaman lawyer says didn’t get the evidence

https://www.newsmax.com/amp/politics/jan-6-prostestor-lawyer/2023/03/07/id/1111475/

Sounds like a terrible lawyer if he is asserting his client did not participate in any lawbreaking and then let him plead guilty to the charges against him. About which, see the article from January below.

Chansley, who pleaded guilty to a felony charge of obstructing an official proceeding, was among the first rioters to enter the building. He has acknowledged using a bullhorn to rile up the mob, offering thanks in a prayer while in the Senate for having the chance to get rid of traitors and scratching out a threatening note to Vice President Mike Pence saying, "It's Only A Matter of Time. Justice Is Coming!"

Though he isn't accused of violence, prosecutors say Chansley, of Arizona, was the "public face of the Capitol riot" who went into the attack with a weapon, ignored repeated police orders to leave the building and gloated about his actions in the days immediately after the attack.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/amp/nation/jan-6-rioter-known-as-qanon-shaman-sentenced-to-41-months

[Anonymous]

Tucker’s trying to divert from the news about his texts being revealed through the dominion lawsuit. Especially those about much he hates Trump.

[Anonymous]

How come the January 6 defenders never talk about Rosanne Boyland?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How come the January 6 defenders never talk about Rosanne Boyland?

You’re looking for logic from the illogical. They don’t want to admit that the insurrectionists were largely drug addled Qanon crazies. The shaman et al got what they deserved. (Actually I think they got better than what they deserved.)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What happened to Tucker Carlson? He used to appear normal and level headed. Years ago I remember watching him and liking him.

He's playing a character on TV for viewership ratings from a specific audience. He's probably the most disappointed of all that his only usable footage was so anemic and inconsequential.

It'll be interesting to see if McCarthy, pushed into this by his special band of idiots, will follow through on giving access to other networks. If so, all that he/they accomplished was opening the door to re-air it all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:this is where the GOP implosion begins. The party is not viable if they alienate 1/3 of their voters.

This is the response/lashing out of someone embarrassed by how this played out.

[Anonymous]

The fact that Chuckie, Moscow Mitch and Romney all commented qbout the videos speak volumes of the coverup within the DC establishment

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The fact that Chuckie, Moscow Mitch and Romney all commented qbout the videos speak volumes of the coverup within the DC establishment

January 6 was not covered up. We all saw it happen live.

Maybe you were in a coma that day - there were videos aired many times since then. Tucker Carlson is not the only one with videos, there are videos everywhere.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The fact that Chuckie, Moscow Mitch and Romney all commented qbout the videos speak volumes of the coverup within the DC establishment

Or, it could be that what Carlson is doing is so deplorable that even the like of Mitch McConnell is speaking out. I mean, they don't want to be charged with accessory after the crime.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The fact that Chuckie, Moscow Mitch and Romney all commented qbout the videos speak volumes of the coverup within the DC establishment

No, it speaks volumes about your paranoid and disordered thinking.

What Carlson did was beyond the pale. Even Mitch and Mitt have enough of a backbone to say that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What happened to Tucker Carlson? He used to appear normal and level headed. Years ago I remember watching him and liking him.

He's playing a character on TV for viewership ratings from a specific audience. He's probably the most disappointed of all that his only usable footage was so anemic and inconsequential.

It'll be interesting to see if McCarthy, pushed into this by his special band of idiots, will follow through on giving access to other networks. If so, all that he/they accomplished was opening the door to re-air it all.

I get that he plays a character, but he must believe in that stuff because it is so extreme that you can’t ever come out from being that character. He disgusts me now.