Kate Middleton's suit

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The whole outfit looks disconnected to me due. Her styling doesn’t match the dress. She has a deep side part with curls and an elegant emerald choker—a glamorous, old Hollywood look—and then there’s this bright, almost neon green dress which skews more modern. I think she needed to style it differently. It might have worked better if she wore sleek, straight hair and different makeup.

Part of the problem is that she is so, so thin, so thin that her proportions are off. The distance from her bustline to the top of her head looks like she is stretched about six inches too tall, and her formerly slim hips are now nothing at all. She can’t wear clothes well because her figure is destroyed and she never really had any taste to begin with.

I wonder why she likes to be this thin.

My guess is that she has IbS or something similar. Basically all the women I know over the age of 40 who are extrremely thin are either addicted to running, or have severe GI problems that really limit what they can eat. It seems especially prevalent in people that have Northern European ancestry. I think there an auto-immune component but also people with stressful lives seem somewhat more affected. I’d bet money she’s on some gluten free or whole 30 diet for a GI or auto-immune problem but doesn’t want to talk about it publicly.

Maybe you missed that a lot of people just think that thin is very attractive.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The whole outfit looks disconnected to me due. Her styling doesn’t match the dress. She has a deep side part with curls and an elegant emerald choker—a glamorous, old Hollywood look—and then there’s this bright, almost neon green dress which skews more modern. I think she needed to style it differently. It might have worked better if she wore sleek, straight hair and different makeup.

Part of the problem is that she is so, so thin, so thin that her proportions are off. The distance from her bustline to the top of her head looks like she is stretched about six inches too tall, and her formerly slim hips are now nothing at all. She can’t wear clothes well because her figure is destroyed and she never really had any taste to begin with.

I wonder why she likes to be this thin.

My guess is that she has IbS or something similar. Basically all the women I know over the age of 40 who are extrremely thin are either addicted to running, or have severe GI problems that really limit what they can eat. It seems especially prevalent in people that have Northern European ancestry. I think there an auto-immune component but also people with stressful lives seem somewhat more affected. I’d bet money she’s on some gluten free or whole 30 diet for a GI or auto-immune problem but doesn’t want to talk about it publicly.

She has always been thin. I think the “thinner” look she has now is just aging. Women that are already thin look thinner in middle age. Usually a combination of facial fat/collagen decreasing and the subcutaneous fat all over decreasing, plus being very active with young kids and a busy schedule. I don’t think she looks emaciated- just middle age thin

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The whole outfit looks disconnected to me due. Her styling doesn’t match the dress. She has a deep side part with curls and an elegant emerald choker—a glamorous, old Hollywood look—and then there’s this bright, almost neon green dress which skews more modern. I think she needed to style it differently. It might have worked better if she wore sleek, straight hair and different makeup.

Part of the problem is that she is so, so thin, so thin that her proportions are off. The distance from her bustline to the top of her head looks like she is stretched about six inches too tall, and her formerly slim hips are now nothing at all. She can’t wear clothes well because her figure is destroyed and she never really had any taste to begin with.

I wonder why she likes to be this thin.

My guess is that she has IbS or something similar. Basically all the women I know over the age of 40 who are extrremely thin are either addicted to running, or have severe GI problems that really limit what they can eat. It seems especially prevalent in people that have Northern European ancestry. I think there an auto-immune component but also people with stressful lives seem somewhat more affected. I’d bet money she’s on some gluten free or whole 30 diet for a GI or auto-immune problem but doesn’t want to talk about it publicly.

She has always been thin. I think the “thinner” look she has now is just aging. Women that are already thin look thinner in middle age. Usually a combination of facial fat/collagen decreasing and the subcutaneous fat all over decreasing, plus being very active with young kids and a busy schedule. I don’t think she looks emaciated- just middle age thin

Yep. Diana was starting to take on that look also in the couple of years before she died.

[Anonymous]

She looks Botoxed within an inch of her life

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She looks fine. Boring but that was to be expected.

+1. Cute but boring.

I would call it sophisticated not boring.

I wear this look a lot and no one knows what I am or am not wearing underneath. So while may appear boring for you to look at, I make it fun to wear.

With all due respect, could you please stop posting on every thread about not wearing underwear? I get if your kink involves exhibitionism, but it's really not that fun for the rest of us to be dragged into your thing. Please save it for the threads where people specifically ask about what you are or are not wearing on your nethers, and leave a thread about a dress about the dress. Please.

Sorry if I offended you, don't know what you are talking about. There are times, I wear it and sometimes I don't. Not into exhibitionism. It's really just for me and DH. I like nice lingerie and nice clothes. It was a different perspective and honest answer to a question asked. I was simply stating that I think there is a sophisticated elegance to her look, but that doesn't always mean boring. That is the fun things about clothes, you can wear as costume to present as who you want to be, or your can hide who you really are, you can just be yourself, or you can have a little piece of all of these show with your outfits.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She looks fine. Boring but that was to be expected.

+1. Cute but boring.

I would call it sophisticated not boring.

I wear this look a lot and no one knows what I am or am not wearing underneath. So while may appear boring for you to look at, I make it fun to wear.

With all due respect, could you please stop posting on every thread about not wearing underwear? I get if your kink involves exhibitionism, but it's really not that fun for the rest of us to be dragged into your thing. Please save it for the threads where people specifically ask about what you are or are not wearing on your nethers, and leave a thread about a dress about the dress. Please.

Sorry if I offended you, don't know what you are talking about. There are times, I wear it and sometimes I don't. Not into exhibitionism. It's really just for me and DH. I like nice lingerie and nice clothes. It was a different perspective and honest answer to a question asked. I was simply stating that I think there is a sophisticated elegance to her look, but that doesn't always mean boring. That is the fun things about clothes, you can wear as costume to present as who you want to be, or your can hide who you really are, you can just be yourself, or you can have a little piece of all of these show with your outfits.

OMG, you are insufferable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She looks fine. Boring but that was to be expected.

+1. Cute but boring.

I would call it sophisticated not boring.

I wear this look a lot and no one knows what I am or am not wearing underneath. So while may appear boring for you to look at, I make it fun to wear.

With all due respect, could you please stop posting on every thread about not wearing underwear? I get if your kink involves exhibitionism, but it's really not that fun for the rest of us to be dragged into your thing. Please save it for the threads where people specifically ask about what you are or are not wearing on your nethers, and leave a thread about a dress about the dress. Please.

Sorry if I offended you, don't know what you are talking about. There are times, I wear it and sometimes I don't. Not into exhibitionism. It's really just for me and DH. I like nice lingerie and nice clothes. It was a different perspective and honest answer to a question asked. I was simply stating that I think there is a sophisticated elegance to her look, but that doesn't always mean boring. That is the fun things about clothes, you can wear as costume to present as who you want to be, or your can hide who you really are, you can just be yourself, or you can have a little piece of all of these show with your outfits.

OMG, you are insufferable.

What have I said that bothers you so much?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She looks fine. Boring but that was to be expected.

+1. Cute but boring.

I would call it sophisticated not boring.

I wear this look a lot and no one knows what I am or am not wearing underneath. So while may appear boring for you to look at, I make it fun to wear.

With all due respect, could you please stop posting on every thread about not wearing underwear? I get if your kink involves exhibitionism, but it's really not that fun for the rest of us to be dragged into your thing. Please save it for the threads where people specifically ask about what you are or are not wearing on your nethers, and leave a thread about a dress about the dress. Please.

Sorry if I offended you, don't know what you are talking about. There are times, I wear it and sometimes I don't. Not into exhibitionism. It's really just for me and DH. I like nice lingerie and nice clothes. It was a different perspective and honest answer to a question asked. I was simply stating that I think there is a sophisticated elegance to her look, but that doesn't always mean boring. That is the fun things about clothes, you can wear as costume to present as who you want to be, or your can hide who you really are, you can just be yourself, or you can have a little piece of all of these show with your outfits.

OMG, you are insufferable.

This has got to the 50-something yr old SAHM wears thigh high stockings and no underwear everyday and brings it up often in posts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She looks fine. Boring but that was to be expected.

+1. Cute but boring.

I would call it sophisticated not boring.

I wear this look a lot and no one knows what I am or am not wearing underneath. So while may appear boring for you to look at, I make it fun to wear.

With all due respect, could you please stop posting on every thread about not wearing underwear? I get if your kink involves exhibitionism, but it's really not that fun for the rest of us to be dragged into your thing. Please save it for the threads where people specifically ask about what you are or are not wearing on your nethers, and leave a thread about a dress about the dress. Please.

Sorry if I offended you, don't know what you are talking about. There are times, I wear it and sometimes I don't. Not into exhibitionism. It's really just for me and DH. I like nice lingerie and nice clothes. It was a different perspective and honest answer to a question asked. I was simply stating that I think there is a sophisticated elegance to her look, but that doesn't always mean boring. That is the fun things about clothes, you can wear as costume to present as who you want to be, or your can hide who you really are, you can just be yourself, or you can have a little piece of all of these show with your outfits.

Well you or someone who writes exactly likes you posts all over this stupid board about how they don't wear underwear because it's fun for them and their husband, and either it's a kink or just super pathetic that you feel the need to tell so many people so much about your undies (or lack thereof).

The dress - great, talk about the dress. Talk about how you'd wear the dress. But please, for the love of gd - and that's to you, and whoever else on this board feels the need to come on all the time to talk about not wearing underwear - go put that in the relationship thread. It's not fashion, it is annoying.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She looks fine. Boring but that was to be expected.

+1. Cute but boring.

I would call it sophisticated not boring.

I wear this look a lot and no one knows what I am or am not wearing underneath. So while may appear boring for you to look at, I make it fun to wear.

With all due respect, could you please stop posting on every thread about not wearing underwear? I get if your kink involves exhibitionism, but it's really not that fun for the rest of us to be dragged into your thing. Please save it for the threads where people specifically ask about what you are or are not wearing on your nethers, and leave a thread about a dress about the dress. Please.

Sorry if I offended you, don't know what you are talking about. There are times, I wear it and sometimes I don't. Not into exhibitionism. It's really just for me and DH. I like nice lingerie and nice clothes. It was a different perspective and honest answer to a question asked. I was simply stating that I think there is a sophisticated elegance to her look, but that doesn't always mean boring. That is the fun things about clothes, you can wear as costume to present as who you want to be, or your can hide who you really are, you can just be yourself, or you can have a little piece of all of these show with your outfits.

OMG, you are insufferable.

This has got to the 50-something yr old SAHM wears thigh high stockings and no underwear everyday and brings it up often in posts.

Every effin day.

[Anonymous]

They both look ugly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The whole outfit looks disconnected to me due. Her styling doesn’t match the dress. She has a deep side part with curls and an elegant emerald choker—a glamorous, old Hollywood look—and then there’s this bright, almost neon green dress which skews more modern. I think she needed to style it differently. It might have worked better if she wore sleek, straight hair and different makeup.

Part of the problem is that she is so, so thin, so thin that her proportions are off. The distance from her bustline to the top of her head looks like she is stretched about six inches too tall, and her formerly slim hips are now nothing at all. She can’t wear clothes well because her figure is destroyed and she never really had any taste to begin with.

I wonder why she likes to be this thin.

My guess is that she has IbS or something similar. Basically all the women I know over the age of 40 who are extrremely thin are either addicted to running, or have severe GI problems that really limit what they can eat. It seems especially prevalent in people that have Northern European ancestry. I think there an auto-immune component but also people with stressful lives seem somewhat more affected. I’d bet money she’s on some gluten free or whole 30 diet for a GI or auto-immune problem but doesn’t want to talk about it publicly.

No, the reality is that she knows every photo of her is published online and scrutinized. Like actresses, she probably looks emaciated in person.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She looks fine. Boring but that was to be expected.

+1. Cute but boring.

I would call it sophisticated not boring.

I wear this look a lot and no one knows what I am or am not wearing underneath. So while may appear boring for you to look at, I make it fun to wear.

With all due respect, could you please stop posting on every thread about not wearing underwear? I get if your kink involves exhibitionism, but it's really not that fun for the rest of us to be dragged into your thing. Please save it for the threads where people specifically ask about what you are or are not wearing on your nethers, and leave a thread about a dress about the dress. Please.

Sorry if I offended you, don't know what you are talking about. There are times, I wear it and sometimes I don't. Not into exhibitionism. It's really just for me and DH. I like nice lingerie and nice clothes. It was a different perspective and honest answer to a question asked. I was simply stating that I think there is a sophisticated elegance to her look, but that doesn't always mean boring. That is the fun things about clothes, you can wear as costume to present as who you want to be, or your can hide who you really are, you can just be yourself, or you can have a little piece of all of these show with your outfits.

OMG, you are insufferable.

This has got to the 50-something yr old SAHM wears thigh high stockings and no underwear everyday and brings it up often in posts.

Poster I am the Sorry if I offended you... poster. Not anywhere near 50, just turned 40. I gave an opinion/observation on a public forum in response to a post another poster made on a PUBLIC forum. Again, sorry if I offended you, I will make sure to never mention lingerie in a fashion thread unless it a question about lingerie. Would that make you happy?

[Anonymous]

This thread has started to amuse me. I'm about Kate's age (a year older) and similar height and body. Also similar facial structure and I feel like we are aging similarly in the face. For what it's worth, I've never had an Botox or fillers. I wear a lot less eye make up than Kate does (like usually just some mascara even for a night out). I get why someone who is as photographed as she is wears much more, though I think her liner is a bit heavy for her age. I used to wear more eye makeup but I've found that as the skin around my eyes has gotten more lined and prone to crepeyness (is that a word), it's just very hard to do much that won't immediately settle into those lines and bring attention to them. I've found I like my appearance more when I do less or stick to more neutral shades with a bit of sparkle. But I'm guessing my "no makeup look" wouldn't fly in the BRF.

In any case, as someone with a pretty similar face/body and likely similar genetics, all the comments about how there must be some dramatic explanation for her thinness or that she must be getting fillers because her cheeks are still full are funny. She's 40! She's a naturally thin person who probably exercises regularly -- that's why she's thin. You don't have to concoct explanations involving smoking, IBS, eating disorders, etc. Some people are just thin. I'm one of them. It's so weird that people think this can't possibly be the case.

Same with her face. You can see the aging in her face, especially around her eyes. I see zero evidence of Botox or fillers. She could be getting them, but if she is, they are not noticeable and she's not overdoing it because her face looks 40. A pretty, healthy 40 in a person who probably has good skincare and drinks enough water, but 40.

I don't even care for the BRF but honestly you all just sound jealous and bitter. Don't be. She's married into a weird family and has to work incredibly hard at a job that is, quite frankly, dumb. I bet her life is pretty high stress and I also can't imagine parenting in that environment, especially parenting a "future monarch." Let her have her natural thinness and her graceful agin. She's got other problems.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She looks fine. Boring but that was to be expected.

+1. Cute but boring.

I would call it sophisticated not boring.

I wear this look a lot and no one knows what I am or am not wearing underneath. So while may appear boring for you to look at, I make it fun to wear.

With all due respect, could you please stop posting on every thread about not wearing underwear? I get if your kink involves exhibitionism, but it's really not that fun for the rest of us to be dragged into your thing. Please save it for the threads where people specifically ask about what you are or are not wearing on your nethers, and leave a thread about a dress about the dress. Please.

Sorry if I offended you, don't know what you are talking about. There are times, I wear it and sometimes I don't. Not into exhibitionism. It's really just for me and DH. I like nice lingerie and nice clothes. It was a different perspective and honest answer to a question asked. I was simply stating that I think there is a sophisticated elegance to her look, but that doesn't always mean boring. That is the fun things about clothes, you can wear as costume to present as who you want to be, or your can hide who you really are, you can just be yourself, or you can have a little piece of all of these show with your outfits.

OMG, you are insufferable.

This has got to the 50-something yr old SAHM wears thigh high stockings and no underwear everyday and brings it up often in posts.

Poster I am the Sorry if I offended you... poster. Not anywhere near 50, just turned 40. I gave an opinion/observation on a public forum in response to a post another poster made on a PUBLIC forum. Again, sorry if I offended you, I will make sure to never mention lingerie in a fashion thread unless it a question about lingerie. Would that make you happy?

Yes, that would be great. And there is never a need to volunteer your penchant for not wearing underwear.