Who will win today's Ward 3 Election?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think it’s clear that there is a level of toxicity that is deeply ingrained with Frumin’s supporters in particular. This will need to be something to watch closely because just like Josh Lopez, these folks will get more and more extreme until eventually Frumin will need to address it.

It's toxic to suggest the GOP are mostly fascists? Then I guess Joe Biden and Liz Cheney are fascists too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:David Krucoff seems to be gaining a lot of support for the fall. Although I think that Frumin is still likely to win, Krucoff could be a strong candidate. Remember that Carol Schwartz, a Republican, enjoyed strong electoral support in Ward 3.

The guy registered to become a republican AFTER 1/6.

He is clearly a full on Trumpster. I don't care whether you opposed bike lanes on Connecticut Avenue or not (his main platform item) - a pro-life, pro-fascist, pro-white nationalist does not deserve a single vote in the District of Columbia.

The core issue is the incivility of the Frumin supporters. Here you are deploying the same playbook against another person who dares to run against Frumin. You know nothing at all about this guy and yet here you are. Pretty sad.

Please cite some examples of the "incivility of the Frumin supporters." I followed this campaign and have no idea what you're talking about.

DP. I’m not in Ward 3 so I didn’t follow the race closely. But the stuff on here claiming Goulet was racist when he discussed the problems with housing voucher tenants was really nasty. False accusations of racism are pretty much the worst.

You have to watch the video in context - the question was how to attract more people of color to Ward 3 and his answer was about vouchers. The people of the color in the race were outraged - for a reason.

I watched it all. The accusation was rank race-baiting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:David Krucoff seems to be gaining a lot of support for the fall. Although I think that Frumin is still likely to win, Krucoff could be a strong candidate. Remember that Carol Schwartz, a Republican, enjoyed strong electoral support in Ward 3.

The guy registered to become a republican AFTER 1/6.

He is clearly a full on Trumpster. I don't care whether you opposed bike lanes on Connecticut Avenue or not (his main platform item) - a pro-life, pro-fascist, pro-white nationalist does not deserve a single vote in the District of Columbia.

The core issue is the incivility of the Frumin supporters. Here you are deploying the same playbook against another person who dares to run against Frumin. You know nothing at all about this guy and yet here you are. Pretty sad.

Please cite some examples of the "incivility of the Frumin supporters." I followed this campaign and have no idea what you're talking about.

DP. I’m not in Ward 3 so I didn’t follow the race closely. But the stuff on here claiming Goulet was racist when he discussed the problems with housing voucher tenants was really nasty. False accusations of racism are pretty much the worst.

You have to watch the video in context - the question was how to attract more people of color to Ward 3 and his answer was about vouchers. The people of the color in the race were outraged - for a reason.

I watched it all. The accusation was rank race-baiting.

How could you have watched it all? Only selected portions were released.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think it’s clear that there is a level of toxicity that is deeply ingrained with Frumin’s supporters in particular. This will need to be something to watch closely because just like Josh Lopez, these folks will get more and more extreme until eventually Frumin will need to address it.

No, it's not clear at all. It's an accusation that is made vaguely, and when challenged to provide specifics the only retort is along the lines of "people are saying."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it’s clear that there is a level of toxicity that is deeply ingrained with Frumin’s supporters in particular. This will need to be something to watch closely because just like Josh Lopez, these folks will get more and more extreme until eventually Frumin will need to address it.

No, it's not clear at all. It's an accusation that is made vaguely, and when challenged to provide specifics the only retort is along the lines of "people are saying."

I am still awaiting examples of the toxic rhetoric. So far, all I have seen is people calling out Goulet for aligning with the Koch brothers via DFER.

[Anonymous]

I would like Frumin better if ditched his gamergate friends.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I would like Frumin better if ditched his gamergate friends.

Cool story, bro.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I would like Frumin better if ditched his gamergate friends.

What does this even mean?