You don’t understand. Being an athlete teaches you such things as time management, grit, teamwork and learning how to lose. These are all traits that can only be gained through being an athlete. That’s why schools like Harvard admit them even if their academic ratings are at the bottom of the pile. |
| Colleges admit athletes because they want good athletes. Put differently, if they wanted the traits you associate with athletes, they would screen for those traits. But they dont't. |
Hahahahahahaha. What? |
| Agree that OP is a student and this thread needs to die |
|
Finally looked at the list. I'm a longtime teacher at a different school and wow, I'm impressed. I see talented young women ready to take the world by storm going to an awesome selection of schools around the country -- big state universities, small liberal arts colleges, schools renowned for humanities, schools known for engineering and STEM.
Congratulations NCS class of 2022! I know you've all worked hard and you will be so well prepared and represent yourselves, your family and your school amazingly. Loved seeing all the kids in different settings in some really stunning photos. Well done all of you! (And well done parents, your kids are poised to do so well at the next stage of their academic journey.) |
So refreshing...a positive, non-snarky post on DCUM. Brava and I have no dog in the fight with respect to NCS. |
If only "abnormal" people gather this kind of information, then thank goodness for abnormal people. It's about time that people disseminate the information that will cause most people to realize that Ivy acceptance is NOT a proxy for academic ability. That said, two of the three hooks discussed--URM and athletes--actually add a lot to the schools in a very obvious way. And, as a non-athlete, I reluctantly have to admit that athletes are often very good at TEAMWORK, which is a skill that the non-athlete grinds at schools like NCS often lack. The college administrators might say that legacies add to the sense of community or, at least, to the bottom line. I don't buy it. |
| Imagine the undergraduate experience at a school with no athletes and only academic grinds. Sounds like fun! |
It is fun…if you are an academic grind. |
That’s most universities in the world. They all seem to be doing fine. |
| Then apply to those non-US universities and stop complaining about the ones here. Problem solved! |
how many students at MIT or Yale attend the typical game there? Check the attendance at the average baseball or lacrosse game. It's less than 1% probably. No one would miss it. so sad that your definition of 'fun' limited to going to a game. you should get out more. |
What a great idea. Will do. Let's empty out the universities of students and fill them with athletes. |
Let's get real. OPs point was not that there weren't any impressive outcomes -- but rather that they were mostly legacy/URM/Athlete. Nothing that this longtime teacher says contradicts the point. OPs observation stays. |
Believe it or not many college students who don't play intercollegiate sports are actually great athletes, and were very good varsity athletes in high school. And that virtually all of the kids going to the top colleges these days who were not athletes have accomplishments in other extracurriculars that are just as, if not more, impressive and - surprise - add just as much to the college community. Given the attendance at most of the varsity games at my HYP, it was pretty much an undergraduate experience with no athletics. |