Meghan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And once again the royals stepped in shit.

It's going to be interesting when Britain comes begging for that U.K.-U.S. trade deal they desperately need.

Did the Kennedy’s have issues with the BRF?

Maybe it’s the Catholic thing?

You know the President of the United States is a practicing Catholic right?

[Anonymous]

https://britishheritage.com/jfk-and-jackie-insulted-queen-elizabeth-at-royal-dinner.amp

Bingo!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://britishheritage.com/jfk-and-jackie-insulted-queen-elizabeth-at-royal-dinner.amp

Bingo!

Jackie did not mince words either.

the First Lady told dinner guests that the queen was “a middle-aged woman so incurious, unintelligent and unremarkable that Britain’s new reduced place in the world was not a surprise but an inevitability

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And once again the royals stepped in shit.

It's going to be interesting when Britain comes begging for that U.K.-U.S. trade deal they desperately need.

Did the Kennedy’s have issues with the BRF?

Maybe it’s the Catholic thing?

You know the President of the United States is a practicing Catholic right?

?

Shriver is a Kennedy. JFK was only the 2nd Catholic president. The Queen is not Catholic; and, you might want to google “the troubles.”

Seems like Jackie O insulted the Queen. And, the Kennedy’s are basically the closest American counterpart to a royal family.

Meghan was raised Catholic BTW.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think their behavior is immature and disingenuous. Only time will tell if their petulance is rewarded with the fame/money they are so desperately seeking.

They’re making money hand over fist now. They didn’t need to be so crass on their exit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And once again the royals stepped in shit.

It's going to be interesting when Britain comes begging for that U.K.-U.S. trade deal they desperately need.

Did the Kennedy’s have issues with the BRF?

Maybe it’s the Catholic thing?

You know the President of the United States is a practicing Catholic right?

?

Shriver is a Kennedy. JFK was only the 2nd Catholic president. The Queen is not Catholic; and, you might want to google “the troubles.”

Seems like Jackie O insulted the Queen. And, the Kennedy’s are basically the closest American counterpart to a royal family.

Meghan was raised Catholic BTW.

I doubt many people today could even name any of the living Kennedys.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And once again the royals stepped in shit.

It's going to be interesting when Britain comes begging for that U.K.-U.S. trade deal they desperately need.

Did the Kennedy’s have issues with the BRF?

Maybe it’s the Catholic thing?

You know the President of the United States is a practicing Catholic right?

?

Shriver is a Kennedy. JFK was only the 2nd Catholic president. The Queen is not Catholic; and, you might want to google “the troubles.”

Seems like Jackie O insulted the Queen. And, the Kennedy’s are basically the closest American counterpart to a royal family.

Meghan was raised Catholic BTW.

Kennedy was the 1st Catholic President and it was a huge deal. Biden is the second.

[Anonymous]

Quite a BRF burn from Maria Shriver though.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Quite a BRF burn from Maria Shriver though.

Oh the Royals are already backpedaling and apologizing. Not to Harry of course - to the powerful Americans they insulted.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9278295/Prince-Harry-Meghan-Markle-NOT-returning-working-royals.html

Here’s the link.

Big babies.

LOL! Other than serving their own bank accounts what are these two doing?

A sight more than the Royal Family seeing as Unicef is feeding British kids these days.

Words, words. Exactly what are they doing?

Did you not hear Andres say that H&M were there on the ground feeding people even when the cameras were not around.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think their behavior is immature and disingenuous. Only time will tell if their petulance is rewarded with the fame/money they are so desperately seeking.

They’re making money hand over fist now. They didn’t need to be so crass on their exit.

Agreed. It was not classy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:


Really interesting to see the statements side by side

The palace sounds gracious and sad. the markles sound petulant and weirdly passive aggressive. no mention of course of caring for Harry's family at all.

VERY passive aggressive. Just now jumping on the bandwagon here and reading Meghan's statement (I'm saying Meghan bc it has her name written all over it) and she is still so SALTY.

I don't care about the royal family, or any family, nor do I know much about them. But I do respect tradition and feel that Meghan should just shuuut uuuuuupppppp already.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:


Really interesting to see the statements side by side

The palace sounds gracious and sad. the markles sound petulant and weirdly passive aggressive. no mention of course of caring for Harry's family at all.

VERY passive aggressive. Just now jumping on the bandwagon here and reading Meghan's statement (I'm saying Meghan bc it has her name written all over it) and she is still so SALTY.

I don't care about the royal family, or any family, nor do I know much about them. But I do respect tradition and feel that Meghan should just shuuut uuuuuupppppp already.

I don't. I was reading an article and found this line amusing:

Over the past year, Harry has had more private conversations with the Queen than at any other time in his life. But none was more difficult than the one this week.

So you're telling me - its only as the Prince is walking away that he finally got some private alone time with his own grandmother? Maybe Harry+Meghan sound 'petulant' for a reason. That isn't a family and the royals have revealed that to the world.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://britishheritage.com/jfk-and-jackie-insulted-queen-elizabeth-at-royal-dinner.amp

Bingo!

Jackie did not mince words either.

the First Lady told dinner guests that the queen was “a middle-aged woman so incurious, unintelligent and unremarkable that Britain’s new reduced place in the world was not a surprise but an inevitability

And yet...the Queen is beloved and still ruling the roost while the curious, intelligent and remarkable Jackie is pushing up daisies while the distant fragments of her family are fading into obscurity.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://britishheritage.com/jfk-and-jackie-insulted-queen-elizabeth-at-royal-dinner.amp

Bingo!

Jackie did not mince words either.

the First Lady told dinner guests that the queen was “a middle-aged woman so incurious, unintelligent and unremarkable that Britain’s new reduced place in the world was not a surprise but an inevitability

And yet...the Queen is beloved and still ruling the roost while the curious, intelligent and remarkable Jackie is pushing up daisies while the distant fragments of her family are fading into obscurity.

Wow. Jackie’s cancer was a character flaw, huh? Wow.