2030 Girls Lacrosse

[Anonymous]

Its not a true battle for #1 cause SW Blue not involved

[Anonymous]

Instead, Sky Walkers continues their easy schedule with a game against B-level team NEMS

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Its not a true battle for #1 cause SW Blue not involved

Has Skywalkers ever beat M&D, MDU or HG at this age?

[Anonymous]

They probably beat M&D Red, MDU West, and HW.

[Anonymous]

There are 18 teams in A division

Why not have 2 divisions of 9, so all teams play same schedule?

4 teams from each division make playoffs?

The issue would be splitting up divisions equally, I’d use the US lax rankings as determiner. Not perfect but way better than current set up

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Its not a true battle for #1 cause SW Blue not involved

Has Skywalkers ever beat M&D, MDU or HG at this age?

A quick look on US Club Lax gives you this answer, which is no. And they haven't beat BLC either.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Its not a true battle for #1 cause SW Blue not involved

Has Skywalkers ever beat M&D, MDU or HG at this age?

A quick look on US Club Lax gives you this answer, which is no. And they haven't beat BLC either.

so when they put the NGLL schedule together they don't try to group by ranking?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Its not a true battle for #1 cause SW Blue not involved

Has Skywalkers ever beat M&D, MDU or HG at this age?

A quick look on US Club Lax gives you this answer, which is no. And they haven't beat BLC either.

Some of the game weighting and ranking changes between summer and fall seem odd, especially with Skywalkers locally. I guess it will get settled on the field at some point.

[Anonymous]

Something is wrong with the rankings. There are some teams ranked way too high

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Something is wrong with the rankings. There are some teams ranked way too high

There is a ratings math tab for each team and you can recalculate the rating. For the teams you think are ranked too high, just find the error in the rating math and let us know what you find.

[Anonymous]

The issue is sample size. Some teams have played less than 12 games. It will all sort out and not that these matter but only the summer rankings really are useful.

I’ve seen a top 10 team after fall end up 50 just having bigger sample size, especially those west coast teams

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The issue is sample size. Some teams have played less than 12 games. It will all sort out and not that these matter but only the summer rankings really are useful.

I’ve seen a top 10 team after fall end up 50 just having bigger sample size, especially those west coast teams

Its also a win percentage. How is Yellow Jackets at #1 if they're truly 6-0. M&D has played 25 games ? MD United and Heros Green have played 16-17 games. Yellow Jackets has never beaten M&D. Hoave they beaten Heros or MD United ?

[Anonymous]

the crazy part is some people believe fall rankings. when the sample size gets bigger they will be in for a rude awakening

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:the crazy part is some people believe fall rankings. when the sample size gets bigger they will be in for a rude awakening

These rankings cover fall, winter, and half of spring. Overall, they’re probably not too far off. There will be some movement.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:the crazy part is some people believe fall rankings. when the sample size gets bigger they will be in for a rude awakening

These rankings cover fall, winter, and half of spring. Overall, they’re probably not too far off. There will be some movement.

There will be a ton of movement by the end of the summer. That's how it goes almost every year.