The Kane Show Discussion Thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He fell off the face of the earth.

Wonder how much he was paid to just leave.

1 year fully paid his salary for severance - over $1 million

How truly awful does a person have to be for a company to think it's worth it to pay that kind of money to make that person go away?

It was probably part of his contract when the show went national a few years ago

The show may have been "national" as in outside of DC, but he never had any significant affiliates. I'm guessing he got a few grand per extra station and that's it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He fell off the face of the earth.

Wonder how much he was paid to just leave.

1 year fully paid his salary for severance - over $1 million

How truly awful does a person have to be for a company to think it's worth it to pay that kind of money to make that person go away?

It was probably part of his contract when the show went national a few years ago

The show may have been "national" as in outside of DC, but he never had any significant affiliates. I'm guessing he got a few grand per extra station and that's it.

Did that Sunday night show he used to do have any bigger affiliates?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He fell off the face of the earth.

Wonder how much he was paid to just leave.

1 year fully paid his salary for severance - over $1 million

How truly awful does a person have to be for a company to think it's worth it to pay that kind of money to make that person go away?

It was probably part of his contract when the show went national a few years ago

The show may have been "national" as in outside of DC, but he never had any significant affiliates. I'm guessing he got a few grand per extra station and that's it.

Did that Sunday night show he used to do have any bigger affiliates?

Doubt it, I don't even know if Hot 995 aired it. Just seems like a filler show probably offered for smaller markets cuz who in any big city would listen to this cheesy stuff?

[Anonymous]

He got a syndication deal back in 2014. And with that, a much higher paycheck

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He got a syndication deal back in 2014. And with that, a much higher paycheck

No, just because you have a syndication deal doesn't mean a much higher paycheck. There are TONS of syndicated shows not making more than a regular salary.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He got a syndication deal back in 2014. And with that, a much higher paycheck

No, just because you have a syndication deal doesn't mean a much higher paycheck. There are TONS of syndicated shows not making more than a regular salary.

Ok, if that’s what you think. But not the case with peter. He got A huge raise.

[Anonymous]

I'm just not understanding why if I Heart was going to pay Kane the rest of his contract they wouldn't just let him continue on his show until his contract was over, unless he was some kind of workplace liability.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He got a syndication deal back in 2014. And with that, a much higher paycheck

No, just because you have a syndication deal doesn't mean a much higher paycheck. There are TONS of syndicated shows not making more than a regular salary.

Ok, if that’s what you think. But not the case with peter. He got A huge raise.

I'm not sure why you would argue this point unless you are him. Even if he told you this, you know he has a history of embellishing the truth.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He got a syndication deal back in 2014. And with that, a much higher paycheck

No, just because you have a syndication deal doesn't mean a much higher paycheck. There are TONS of syndicated shows not making more than a regular salary.

Ok, if that’s what you think. But not the case with peter. He got A huge raise.

I'm not sure why you would argue this point unless you are him. Even if he told you this, you know he has a history of embellishing the truth.

Why are you so sure you are right?
-DP

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He got a syndication deal back in 2014. And with that, a much higher paycheck

No, just because you have a syndication deal doesn't mean a much higher paycheck. There are TONS of syndicated shows not making more than a regular salary.

Ok, if that’s what you think. But not the case with peter. He got A huge raise.

I'm not sure why you would argue this point unless you are him. Even if he told you this, you know he has a history of embellishing the truth.

There’s proof out there that he got a significant raise when he went national/syndicated. There’s also legitimate proof he is getting paid a very comfortable severance. But if you want to argue OP, feel free

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He got a syndication deal back in 2014. And with that, a much higher paycheck

No, just because you have a syndication deal doesn't mean a much higher paycheck. There are TONS of syndicated shows not making more than a regular salary.

Ok, if that’s what you think. But not the case with peter. He got A huge raise.

I'm not sure why you would argue this point unless you are him. Even if he told you this, you know he has a history of embellishing the truth.

There’s proof out there that he got a significant raise when he went national/syndicated. There’s also legitimate proof he is getting paid a very comfortable severance. But if you want to argue OP, feel free

Then share it

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He got a syndication deal back in 2014. And with that, a much higher paycheck

No, just because you have a syndication deal doesn't mean a much higher paycheck. There are TONS of syndicated shows not making more than a regular salary.

Ok, if that’s what you think. But not the case with peter. He got A huge raise.

I'm not sure why you would argue this point unless you are him. Even if he told you this, you know he has a history of embellishing the truth.

There’s proof out there that he got a significant raise when he went national/syndicated. There’s also legitimate proof he is getting paid a very comfortable severance. But if you want to argue OP, feel free

Then share it

+1 What proof? Share it, then. The raise and the severance, how do you know about either?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He got a syndication deal back in 2014. And with that, a much higher paycheck

No, just because you have a syndication deal doesn't mean a much higher paycheck. There are TONS of syndicated shows not making more than a regular salary.

Ok, if that’s what you think. But not the case with peter. He got A huge raise.

I'm not sure why you would argue this point unless you are him. Even if he told you this, you know he has a history of embellishing the truth.

There’s proof out there that he got a significant raise when he went national/syndicated. There’s also legitimate proof he is getting paid a very comfortable severance. But if you want to argue OP, feel free

Then share it

DP- but in the custody /divorce mess, Natasha stated that Kane income was $1.5 mil.

+1 What proof? Share it, then. The raise and the severance, how do you know about either?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He got a syndication deal back in 2014. And with that, a much higher paycheck

No, just because you have a syndication deal doesn't mean a much higher paycheck. There are TONS of syndicated shows not making more than a regular salary.

Ok, if that’s what you think. But not the case with peter. He got A huge raise.

I'm not sure why you would argue this point unless you are him. Even if he told you this, you know he has a history of embellishing the truth.

There’s proof out there that he got a significant raise when he went national/syndicated. There’s also legitimate proof he is getting paid a very comfortable severance. But if you want to argue OP, feel free

Then share it

+1 What proof? Share it, then. The raise and the severance, how do you know about either?

DP - but in the custody/divorce mess, Natasha stated that Kane income was $1.5 mil.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He got a syndication deal back in 2014. And with that, a much higher paycheck

No, just because you have a syndication deal doesn't mean a much higher paycheck. There are TONS of syndicated shows not making more than a regular salary.

Ok, if that’s what you think. But not the case with peter. He got A huge raise.

I'm not sure why you would argue this point unless you are him. Even if he told you this, you know he has a history of embellishing the truth.

There’s proof out there that he got a significant raise when he went national/syndicated. There’s also legitimate proof he is getting paid a very comfortable severance. But if you want to argue OP, feel free

Then share it

+1 What proof? Share it, then. The raise and the severance, how do you know about either?

DP - but in the custody/divorce mess, Natasha stated that Kane income was $1.5 mil.

And what is it now? Don't forget to include the loss on that big house.