War with Iran Part II

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Getting out without bombing all their military and political government facilities would truly be a bad decision.
Every base, airfield, and ministry other than pedagogy and health, etc. (those that provide services to the poor and sick) should be leveled.

It is not possible. Israel and the US took their best shot and failed. If the US attacks(let’s face it Israel is a paper tiger incapable of doing anything but keeping the war going) Iran destroys 20% of the world’s oil production for 10-15 years. This would mean oil at $200 a barrel and $12 a gallon gas.

If you think Israel has problems now wait till you see the world’s reaction.

Trump's lost so much national/global credibility that his comments on Iran barely make the news any more. "We're close to a deal." Sure, bro. "Iran waited too long and will pay the price." Sure, bro.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Total aside, but I have been getting medical care at Walter reed for twenty years while my spouse fought in the last war (wars?). I don't really even know how to sum up what happened post 9/11 because it was many rolling conflicts and fronts and there hasn't really been any kind of summation - a complex and strange conflict. But to land the plane- used to see many, many grievously injured service members there. Then very few. Then the other day I saw a shockingly wounded young person. It could have been this conflict with Iran, it could have been a car accident. Idk, I didn't ask. But it clocked for me how I hadn't seen anyone freshly wounded there in a good amount of time.

It should be the IdF losing limbs at 19 fighting iran not Americans . If cameras were allowed in Walter reed, Americans would be outraged

[Anonymous]

Wars should be for necessity not for other nations. G. Washington warned about unnatural foreign attachments and alliances for a reason

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Getting out without bombing all their military and political government facilities would truly be a bad decision.
Every base, airfield, and ministry other than pedagogy and health, etc. (those that provide services to the poor and sick) should be leveled.

Would you wish this on the US too? I can think of a lot of soft targets all around the US that retaliation would render horrific results.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Israel did the same thing to their other ally, the British. The British administration in Palestine was a target of violent Zionist terror gangs throughout the mid 1940s after the British lost everything fighting ww2/hitler . A Broadway play was even used to boost their cause/ support

https://newlinesmag.com/essays/how-broadway-helped-the-zionist-revolt-against-britain/

Wait, now we're supposed to be *in favor* of imperial colonialism?

No. Absolutely not. But let’s not forget why the British went to Palestine in the first place. It was only to give Jews a homeland via the Balfour declaration of 1917. Britain never cared about Palestine until Zionists gave British the idea. The Brit’s already had their Suez Canal. They could easily cross the Red Sea to reach the Indian Ocean/their colonies. They also went from Africa to India via the ocean.

Britain never gave much thought about the Ottoman Empire/Middle East prior to WW1/Zionist lobbying because they didn’t need to. Britain lasted maybe 50 years or less as the primary Zionist sponsor until things moved to France and finally the US in 1967

The British were interested in the ME prior to WW1. Some of their interest was a natural extension of their control over the Indian subcontinent.

No need to rewrite history.

That’s not true. Ottoman Egypt invited Britain to help them fight Napoleon in the 1800s. After that, Britain and Ottomans shared control of Egypt and Britain built the Suez Canal there. Ottoman Empire and Britain had a good relationship because they had the same nemesis (France, Russia). They had zero interest in anything else in the Me especially Palestine. The Suez Canal was their main concern for trade.

During WW1, France, Britain, Russia became unnatural allies against the Ottoman Empire but the same Zionist elements that destroyed the Ottoman Empire in ww1 ended the British empire in ww2 via the same tactics

[Anonymous]

That’s not to mention the end of the Russian empire during WW1 as well also due to the Zionist element.

The great alignment happened during WW1 not WW2. America became the singular global empire/ superpower post WW2 but that’s also on borrowed time. Next up is China.

[Anonymous]

Uhhh I guess the war is back on

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Uhhh I guess the war is back on

Let's see what his new position is when he wakes up from his afternoon grandpa nap. I assume that the Iranians will have come to him with tears in their eyes ready to make a very strong, very powerful deal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Getting out without bombing all their military and political government facilities would truly be a bad decision.
Every base, airfield, and ministry other than pedagogy and health, etc. (those that provide services to the poor and sick) should be leveled.

Would you wish this on the US too? I can think of a lot of soft targets all around the US that retaliation would render horrific results.

They do not GAF about America or Americans.

[Anonymous]

Come on down MAGA Trump ran on "no war"

Come on down MAGA and explain your stupidity in believing that two-bit con pedophile.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Getting out without bombing all their military and political government facilities would truly be a bad decision.
Every base, airfield, and ministry other than pedagogy and health, etc. (those that provide services to the poor and sick) should be leveled.

Would you wish this on the US too? I can think of a lot of soft targets all around the US that retaliation would render horrific results.

They do not GAF about America or Americans.

Who doesn't GAF about Americans?

[Anonymous]

I love this:
“Trump the unreliable narrator fails to force reality to match his story on Iran
Andrew Roth
Andrew Roth
As the story of the US-Iran war is written direct to social media, Donald Trump may be the genre’s premier unreliable narrator.

Since the war began, Trump has again and again threatened Iran with fearsome consequences if Tehran doesn’t come to the table and sign a peace deal that the US president said was imminent weeks ago. And he has also repeatedly claimed that an Iran deal is “close” – without any result. (A CNN tally put the number of times he’s claimed it at 38.)

Never mind that the US has already claimed “complete victory” in the conflict and Trump has attacked reporters who have questioned the wisdom of the intervention, particularly as the strait of Hormuz remains closed to more than 20% of global oil traffic.

Even so, he continues to seek to have it both ways: both declaring Iran vanquished and painting the country’s stubbornness as the reason why he can’t sign a peace deal and end the conflict.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Israel did the same thing to their other ally, the British. The British administration in Palestine was a target of violent Zionist terror gangs throughout the mid 1940s after the British lost everything fighting ww2/hitler . A Broadway play was even used to boost their cause/ support

https://newlinesmag.com/essays/how-broadway-helped-the-zionist-revolt-against-britain/

Wait, now we're supposed to be *in favor* of imperial colonialism?

No. Absolutely not. But let’s not forget why the British went to Palestine in the first place. It was only to give Jews a homeland via the Balfour declaration of 1917. Britain never cared about Palestine until Zionists gave British the idea. The Brit’s already had their Suez Canal. They could easily cross the Red Sea to reach the Indian Ocean/their colonies. They also went from Africa to India via the ocean.

Britain never gave much thought about the Ottoman Empire/Middle East prior to WW1/Zionist lobbying because they didn’t need to. Britain lasted maybe 50 years or less as the primary Zionist sponsor until things moved to France and finally the US in 1967

The British were interested in the ME prior to WW1. Some of their interest was a natural extension of their control over the Indian subcontinent.

No need to rewrite history.

That’s not true. Ottoman Egypt invited Britain to help them fight Napoleon in the 1800s. After that, Britain and Ottomans shared control of Egypt and Britain built the Suez Canal there. Ottoman Empire and Britain had a good relationship because they had the same nemesis (France, Russia). They had zero interest in anything else in the Me especially Palestine. The Suez Canal was their main concern for trade.

During WW1, France, Britain, Russia became unnatural allies against the Ottoman Empire but the same Zionist elements that destroyed the Ottoman Empire in ww1 ended the British empire in ww2 via the same tactics

Proving that Britain didn't have interest in the ME by pointing to British activity in the ME? Look up TE Lawrence's activities pre WW1. The area of the Gulf States was considered part of British controlled India.

This is a big tangent so won't continue further.

Also Russia was and still is an empire. They may have had some setbacks from the Cold War but they are still expansionist in intent.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Getting out without bombing all their military and political government facilities would truly be a bad decision.
Every base, airfield, and ministry other than pedagogy and health, etc. (those that provide services to the poor and sick) should be leveled.

Would you wish this on the US too? I can think of a lot of soft targets all around the US that retaliation would render horrific results.

They do not GAF about America or Americans.

The Americans supporting Israel’s war over the interests of America and Americans.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Getting out without bombing all their military and political government facilities would truly be a bad decision.
Every base, airfield, and ministry other than pedagogy and health, etc. (those that provide services to the poor and sick) should be leveled.

Would you wish this on the US too? I can think of a lot of soft targets all around the US that retaliation would render horrific results.

They do not GAF about America or Americans.

Who doesn't GAF about Americans?

Israelis clearly