Meghan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates

[Anonymous]

i really think meghan and harry should voluntarily not use their titles any more. its just not a good look to be duchess of anything in America.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
You think Charles is clean and Andrew is dirty? Nope. Charles has his own pedophile connection that no one talks about.

Shades of Lyndon Larouche!

The Nazi King was an asshole but he was also universally adored by the public and his problem who took over could barely get through a public speech and smoked constantly.

And now we're making fun of people who stutter? Nice! The Duke of Windsor smoked plenty. I'm not sure what it has to do with anything.

I don't care much about the BRF, except to the extent that they put on pageants that bring out delightful hats, but if we're talking about how to produce a desirable product, it seems as though they've decided to go retro and thrifty. I expect EII is baffled by some of her grandchildren's choices, as any nonagenarian would be, but it's got to be easier on the budget.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9278295/Prince-Harry-Meghan-Markle-NOT-returning-working-royals.html

Here’s the link.

Big babies.

LOL! Other than serving their own bank accounts what are these two doing?

A sight more than the Royal Family seeing as Unicef is feeding British kids these days.

Words, words. Exactly what are they doing?

I'll expand that question, what exactly is the royal family doing?

At the very least, the real royals aren’t pimping themselves out in a crass effort to make money and rub elbows with celebrities.

Additionally, they don’t whine about their lives. It’s all stiff upper lip and carry on.

I respect them for that.

You don’t know what the real royals are doing at all since the Queen lobbied parliament to shield their personal wealth. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.newsweek.com/queen-elizabeth-iis-net-worth-how-she-hid-her-wealth-lobbied-government-1567462%3famp=1

The BRF has also invested millions of pounds offshore. Just because you can’t understand how they make money they way you can how someone doing an interview can be paid doesn’t mean they aren’t also pimping themselves out. I am actually super impressed how after thousands of years of claiming they are entitled by divine right to exploit the resources of people in the UK and abroad they have convinced folks they are public servants.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If they willingly left, why are they so bitter, petulant and angry?

I am SO confused. These two are so stupid and self absorbed. They CHOSE to step away from their public service commitments. Now they are angry they can no longer support their charities?

Something tells me it was the BRF that gave them the boot initially.

They wanted to keep the good Royal stuff without having any responsibility or restrictions. Duh.

Right and being the vapid, self absorbed grifters that they are, they are seething that their royal gravy train is now officially shut. They will have to hustle without any promise of public access to the BRF.

A big part of their money making scheme is now taken away.

LOL gravy train? They don’t make any money as Royals - the only ones with actual money are the Queen and Prince of Wales.

Meanwhile in less than a year the Sussex’s have netted deals worth $100 million. And are going to get a substantial percentage of Daily Mail earnings from 2019 because they won their lawsuit.

Allegedly.

They have not produced a podcast for Spotify since their last one in December. It was lacking in substantive content and was soundbites from their famous friends.

What is going on with their Netflix deal? How come we have no details about their upcoming projects? Maybe we will hear about them on Oprah.

They're whole "brand" is "celebrity royals." Now their royal access is publically cut or limited.

Are Meghan and Harry interesting by themselves as individuals?

They’re still “celebrity royals” because Harry is a hereditary prince. What were the actual benefits of being a working royal? Having the privilege of renting frogmore?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9278295/Prince-Harry-Meghan-Markle-NOT-returning-working-royals.html

Here’s the link.

Big babies.

LOL! Other than serving their own bank accounts what are these two doing?

A sight more than the Royal Family seeing as Unicef is feeding British kids these days.

Words, words. Exactly what are they doing?

I'll expand that question, what exactly is the royal family doing?

At the very least, the real royals aren’t pimping themselves out in a crass effort to make money and rub elbows with celebrities.

Additionally, they don’t whine about their lives. It’s all stiff upper lip and carry on.

I respect them for that.

You don’t know what the real royals are doing at all since the Queen lobbied parliament to shield their personal wealth. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.newsweek.com/queen-elizabeth-iis-net-worth-how-she-hid-her-wealth-lobbied-government-1567462%3famp=1

The BRF has also invested millions of pounds offshore. Just because you can’t understand how they make money they way you can how someone doing an interview can be paid doesn’t mean they aren’t also pimping themselves out. I am actually super impressed how after thousands of years of claiming they are entitled by divine right to exploit the resources of people in the UK and abroad they have convinced folks they are public servants.

I know. It's kind of amazing how much they get away with their grift. And while protecting child molesters!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:i really think meghan and harry should voluntarily not use their titles any more. its just not a good look to be duchess of anything in America.

Hah, Meghan will never let go of that title, even if she and Harry divorce. It’s her ticket to relevancy. She was virtually a nobody until she became engaged to Harry.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:i really think meghan and harry should voluntarily not use their titles any more. its just not a good look to be duchess of anything in America.

Hah, Meghan will never let go of that title, even if she and Harry divorce. It’s her ticket to relevancy. She was virtually a nobody until she became engaged to Harry.

+1

All while pretending she didn't know who he wasy until she met him/he told her.

[Anonymous]

I know this is meghan and harry news, but does anyone know why eugenie's baby name hasn't been announced?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9278295/Prince-Harry-Meghan-Markle-NOT-returning-working-royals.html

Here’s the link.

Big babies.

LOL! Other than serving their own bank accounts what are these two doing?

A sight more than the Royal Family seeing as Unicef is feeding British kids these days.

Words, words. Exactly what are they doing?

I'll expand that question, what exactly is the royal family doing?

At the very least, the real royals aren’t pimping themselves out in a crass effort to make money and rub elbows with celebrities.

Additionally, they don’t whine about their lives. It’s all stiff upper lip and carry on.

I respect them for that.

You don’t know what the real royals are doing at all since the Queen lobbied parliament to shield their personal wealth. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.newsweek.com/queen-elizabeth-iis-net-worth-how-she-hid-her-wealth-lobbied-government-1567462%3famp=1

The BRF has also invested millions of pounds offshore. Just because you can’t understand how they make money they way you can how someone doing an interview can be paid doesn’t mean they aren’t also pimping themselves out. I am actually super impressed how after thousands of years of claiming they are entitled by divine right to exploit the resources of people in the UK and abroad they have convinced folks they are public servants.

I know. It's kind of amazing how much they get away with their grift. And while protecting child molesters!

That's ... really not what grift means. Or graft.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9278295/Prince-Harry-Meghan-Markle-NOT-returning-working-royals.html

Here’s the link.

Big babies.

LOL! Other than serving their own bank accounts what are these two doing?

A sight more than the Royal Family seeing as Unicef is feeding British kids these days.

Words, words. Exactly what are they doing?

I'll expand that question, what exactly is the royal family doing?

At the very least, the real royals aren’t pimping themselves out in a crass effort to make money and rub elbows with celebrities.

Additionally, they don’t whine about their lives. It’s all stiff upper lip and carry on.

I respect them for that.

You don’t know what the real royals are doing at all since the Queen lobbied parliament to shield their personal wealth. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.newsweek.com/queen-elizabeth-iis-net-worth-how-she-hid-her-wealth-lobbied-government-1567462%3famp=1

The BRF has also invested millions of pounds offshore. Just because you can’t understand how they make money they way you can how someone doing an interview can be paid doesn’t mean they aren’t also pimping themselves out. I am actually super impressed how after thousands of years of claiming they are entitled by divine right to exploit the resources of people in the UK and abroad they have convinced folks they are public servants.

I know. It's kind of amazing how much they get away with their grift. And while protecting child molesters!

That's ... really not what grift means. Or graft.

Fine. Let's just call it theft then.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9278295/Prince-Harry-Meghan-Markle-NOT-returning-working-royals.html

Here’s the link.

Big babies.

LOL! Other than serving their own bank accounts what are these two doing?

A sight more than the Royal Family seeing as Unicef is feeding British kids these days.

Words, words. Exactly what are they doing?

I'll expand that question, what exactly is the royal family doing?

At the very least, the real royals aren’t pimping themselves out in a crass effort to make money and rub elbows with celebrities.

Additionally, they don’t whine about their lives. It’s all stiff upper lip and carry on.

I respect them for that.

You don’t know what the real royals are doing at all since the Queen lobbied parliament to shield their personal wealth. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.newsweek.com/queen-elizabeth-iis-net-worth-how-she-hid-her-wealth-lobbied-government-1567462%3famp=1

The BRF has also invested millions of pounds offshore. Just because you can’t understand how they make money they way you can how someone doing an interview can be paid doesn’t mean they aren’t also pimping themselves out. I am actually super impressed how after thousands of years of claiming they are entitled by divine right to exploit the resources of people in the UK and abroad they have convinced folks they are public servants.

I know. It's kind of amazing how much they get away with their grift. And while protecting child molesters!

That's ... really not what grift means. Or graft.

Fine. Let's just call it theft then.

You can do whatever you want.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9278295/Prince-Harry-Meghan-Markle-NOT-returning-working-royals.html

Here’s the link.

Big babies.

LOL! Other than serving their own bank accounts what are these two doing?

A sight more than the Royal Family seeing as Unicef is feeding British kids these days.

Words, words. Exactly what are they doing?

I'll expand that question, what exactly is the royal family doing?

At the very least, the real royals aren’t pimping themselves out in a crass effort to make money and rub elbows with celebrities.

Additionally, they don’t whine about their lives. It’s all stiff upper lip and carry on.

I respect them for that.

You don’t know what the real royals are doing at all since the Queen lobbied parliament to shield their personal wealth. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.newsweek.com/queen-elizabeth-iis-net-worth-how-she-hid-her-wealth-lobbied-government-1567462%3famp=1

The BRF has also invested millions of pounds offshore. Just because you can’t understand how they make money they way you can how someone doing an interview can be paid doesn’t mean they aren’t also pimping themselves out. I am actually super impressed how after thousands of years of claiming they are entitled by divine right to exploit the resources of people in the UK and abroad they have convinced folks they are public servants.

I know. It's kind of amazing how much they get away with their grift. And while protecting child molesters!

Before you get all high and might Harry and Meghan are using their titles, positions and connections from that very same royal family to now enrich themselves.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:i really think meghan and harry should voluntarily not use their titles any more. its just not a good look to be duchess of anything in America.

I think she should at least. She was a Duchess for a hot second before moving back to the US.

I don't know, but I am very over her. It's totally unfair, but I've just kind of come to the conclusion that she's bad news and is in fact the problem, not the Royal Family. And I say that as I totally acknowledge that a lot of the criticism of her is racially based.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:i really think meghan and harry should voluntarily not use their titles any more. its just not a good look to be duchess of anything in America.

I think she should at least. She was a Duchess for a hot second before moving back to the US.

I don't know, but I am very over her. It's totally unfair, but I've just kind of come to the conclusion that she's bad news and is in fact the problem, not the Royal Family. And I say that as I totally acknowledge that a lot of the criticism of her is racially based.

Absolutely

[Anonymous]

Take these words with a grain of salt as I have no personal affiliation with any of the parties discussed. These are just the observations of a casual royal watcher:

Harry and Meghan have a deep PR and image problem. They are constantly putting their foot in their mouth and have made a series of very costly missteps since joining and then stepping away from the BRF. We do not know who they are on a personal level, but based on how they appear in the media, they come across as entirely unlikeable characters. I turned cold towards them when they did that documentary in Africa after meeting Nelson Mandela's widow and visiting orphanages. Instead of discussing important issues and the suffering of human lives around them, Meghan stands in front of the camera and does that fake doe-eyed pose, "No one has asked me if I am okay" and "Its not just enough to survive, you have to thrive."

There is NO charitable way to look at that supreme act of self-involvement and narcissism. On what planet did they think an entire documentary shot in Africa, focused on the whining and crying of a millionaire prince from the most famous royal family in the world and his beautiful hollywood bride was going to go over well? Tone deaf? Narcissists? How do you explain that?

Then there is the fact that both of them appear to treat their families extremely poorly. Meghan's mistreatment of her family is well documented, but the way Harry and Meghan exited the BRF is truly something else. Now that they're out, they're on a mission to badmouth and malign the image of the BRF. Meanwhile the BRF members continue to stand quietly and work on their various projects and work commitments with quiet dignity.

We also are in the middle of a global pandemic since last March. The BRF has completed multiple high profile and high impact relief efforts for the public. Meghan and Harry have meanwhile: occupied an extremely expensive mansion in the middle of Hollywoodland; made deals with media conglomerates; whined and cried about the BRF and self promoted every chance they have gotten.

Point being:

BRF: 100 Harry and Meghan: -100