Do you think children will be grateful for that later on in life? |
Suing who? The private company that has decided they no longer wish to print a couple of books? They’d be laughed out of court. |
Isn't that LITERALLY what you are arguing should happen? Someone pointed out that a piece of literature had racist elements but, instead of saying it should be cancelled, recommended it in spite of the offensive content? And, by the way, that is the reality of the Little House series. I read them with my kids and we had to talk about how Ma is strong and brave and wise and smart and a wonderful mother, and also suuuuuuuuuuuuuuper racist against Native Americans. You do have to deal with the offensive content. |
What an absurd standard. |
DP. Apparently there is. Censoring now promotes woke culture and like everything else is outsourced to businesses. It might not be the right word, but it's a close enough concept that it's being adopted to describe this. |
These books are no longer listed on the recommended reading lists. So yes, I call that censorship. There were also yearly awards named after the author that were renamed due to public pressure, which is essentially cancelling her since she's dead for more than half a century and I'm not sure what else they could do to cancel her. |
Ahh, geez. Another thread that makes me fearful for the future of our country when people can’t discern the difference between censorship and the free market. I’m a moderate but I really hate the right at this moment for all their fear-mongering and arm-waving on click Nate topics rather than the important stuff we need to get done.
|
DP. "Read this, but heads up there's some racist stuff in it" is so far from censorship that it's hard to take you seriously. It doesn't even suggest that you shouldn't read that book! There are books I actively suggest people not read? I guess that's a book burning in your topsy-turvy world. |
So every book not on a recommended list is being censored? Do you people even hear yourselves? |
What is the name for the free market cancelling a beloved cultual icon in accordance with an ideology I don't agree with There is no better word than censoring right now. If the use it enough that way, that becomes the new definition. This happens all the time with other words. Why fight over words? You know what they are talking about. |
You sound old. "Back in my day" old. Sorry we don't watch the same movies and listen to the same music and read the same books as you did when you were a child. That's the way the world works, unless you live in an authoritarian state that dictates what gets published and what media people can consume. And who the heck associates Dr Seuss with facts and intellect anyway? Have to go now and read Green Eggs and Ham to my younger child. It's our favorite. |
I'm just saying they are pointing to a cultural change they don't agree with. This is so new, there is no word for it. But you know what they are complaining about anyway. |
+1 This is what we all agreed, right? If a book is offensive - and these books will live on in existing bookshelves all over the country - we have to talk to our kids about why they’re offensive and why we don’t talk about people like that anymore or depict them that way. (And shout out to Birchbark House by Louise Erdrich, meant to be sort of a Native perspective story on the era in which LHOTP was set. It’s in a slightly different geographical location, but it’s really, really good. I read both to my son.) |
It's called capitalism. Corporations and companies and firms do what they want with regard to their products. If you want that regulated then move to a different country. I'm sorry you are no longer allowed to read Dr. Seuss wherever you are. I don't understand why you aren't, because we are reading one of his books here tonight, but obviously you live in a different world. |