+1 |
I agree. All of the SAHMs I know fall into one of these categories: - Wouldn’t make enough to “pay” for childcare (ignoring the fact that childcare *should be* a shared expense), - Dealing with a difficult situation (SN child, ailing parent) - Have a spouse who works or travels a lot and is generally not around I am Stanford educated and know many Ivy-educated women, but I just don’t see very many outside these categories who stay at home for extended periods of time. |
Agree with this completely. I like that me working makes it so the kids see equal amounts of both parents. DH gets them ready in the morning and drops off at school. I finish up early and meet them at the bus stop. Grandparents help out by filling in if either of our work schedules get crazy one week. It’s great for them to have a dad who’s actively involved in their lives. Ideally families with a SAHM would have this as well, but I find that all too often the DH uses his breadwinner status to avoid a lot of childcare and just pop in at bedtime. Hence the kids get used to going to mom for everything, which is not great IMO. |
I have never met a SAHM who cares if anyone else works or not. The number of WOHMs here, however, that invent weird narratives about SAHMs who live pitiful existences and are miserably married is truly remarkable. No one accused you of anything, but the hostile attacks on SAHMs reeks of mom guilt. |
I have been both. The nastiness goes both ways, trust me. If you believe it's only one way, you are likely perpetuating it or participating. Or dishonest. |
This has certainly been educational.
My friends (mostly not in DC or major metros) are just ordinary people. Not a single one has ever been on a private jet, never mind owning one. They about uniformly live modest lives. Among the moms, there are ones that work because they have to, and ones that work because they want to. Among SAHMs, there are ones that do it because they want to, and ones that do it because they have to. The reasons for their decisions are disparate, but rarely made without a lot of thought. What I have found is that while there is often more angst about lost time among those that work (especially if they have to), there is similar amount of angst about financial problems among the SAH moms. There is no utopia, unless you’re exceedingly wealthy, in which case, your choices will likely not have dire consequences. Personally, I work, and I want to work. When I retire, I will still need to do something that keeps my brain occupied. I’m just thankful to be in a place where I have choices. |
+1. I see nastiness on both sides, but the vitriol from the working moms is on another level. Thinking sahms are worthless, don’t contribute to society, really? You have to have a deep sense of self hatred and raging jealousy to have such strong feelings about anyone else. |
The self-hatred is on both sides. When I was a SAHM —twice and in two different communities—, there was a lot of criticism of moms who worked FT. I was really shocked by it because I certainly intended to return to work sooner rather than later and didn’t appreciate the insinuation that I was going to neglect my child or that I found children boring and was “chasing excitement”. It made me feel very isolated from the other SAHM and in the case of my younger child, was why I planned to start working FTOH earlier than with the older one. |
+2 Completely agree, but I'll specify that it's vitriol I see on DCUM. I never see these mommy wars in real life. Maybe people just keep these vehement beliefs to themselves, or maybe it's a DC thing (I have moved away to a different area). |
Depends. With enough economic instability, people might hang on longer. |
Nope, sorry, but you have blinders on. There is SO much vitriol from stay at home moms who accuse working moms of "abandoning their kids in daycares" and ask why they bothered to have kids at all. You sound like a fool for blaming one group more than the other. |
I have been on both sides and it’s definitely nastier from WOH, 100%. UMC circle though where you don’t get a lot of SAHMs that don’t use housekeeper or preschool, so there’s not much of the “letting other people raise your kids” narrative since most use some form of childcare themselves and see the merits of it. |
I've been on both sides as well and it's definitely nastier from the SAHMs, 100%. So there you go. "How could you abandon your child to go back to work?" "I love my child way more than I love any job I've ever had." "It's so sad when people value their job over their kids." "Not a full-time parent, not raising your kids." Just stop. I don't care where YOU have heard it from more, just like it doesn't matter where I have heard it from more. It is bad from both sides. No side is better off here. Stop acting like it is. You sound ridiculous. |
+1 "If you want to leave your kid with some low-wage childcare worker..." Keep it classy SAHMs! |
+1 I think you'll see a lot more people hanging on for the healthcare benefits if their spouse has a stable job. |