Forum Index
»
Private & Independent Schools
That’s a bit harsh. |
| I told you no one was listening to Don Imus! I told you they’re all dead! |
| I feel sorry for the girl and the accused in this case. That poor girl doesn’t have much of a chance with a grandmother like that. |
I thought Don Imus was dead. Still alive, only 79, seems like he should be at least 100 by now. Yes, he did teach us all a new vocabulary word back then. |
Have you now read more about the facts instead of just spouting off your ignorant opinion? |
I know! Her dreadlocks are still there and they look beautiful! |
It's becoming the New York Enquirer. Sensational writers. |
No, its not harsh. Its reality. |
Those dreads do not look well maintained at all. Know several kids and adults with dreads and they look really nice but nothing like that. I feel bad for the girl. She was probably teased by the boys or other kids about it and got mad. She may want another hairstyle and not allowed. |
| That girl has been punished enough for lying, lying as all kids do. Stop piling on. |
Sensational writers and editors and managers and investors and the whole thing. The NYT as we knew it is a fraud. |
Yuuuuuuuuuuuup |
That's a bit comical, given what we know now? |
I haven't been on this thread or followed this story for several days, but glad I held my powder above from the start. It was suspicious from the start for many of the reasons posted above and for others. The truth is that the media used to be very careful about reporting crime -- always referring to "alleged perpetrators" even when they had eyewitnesses. Now with no witnesses and just an alleged victim -- before there is any investigation at all -- the media is wiling to sensationalize and assume guilt until proven innocent - especially if they can play up a race or gender element. This is one of the by-products of the me too movement having gone too far. If any claimed victim is "presumed" to be telling the truth, by definition her accused is "presumed guilty" in the court of public opinion I'm not arguing that there aren't horrible people -- men overwhelmingly -- that assault women and girls all too often and have gotten away with it for far too long. There are and they have. But I am arguing that as a society we have to decide whether an uncorroborated allegation alone will be sufficient to take down a potentially innocent person in the court of public opinion -- be expelled from school, fired from a job, and land in the center of calls for condemnation amplified by careless journalism. I am sure that there are far fewer false allegations that truthful ones, but I suspect as people discover that they have a new-found power to bring down someone with an uncorroborated allegation, there numbers of false ones will increase. Unfortunately, several of these incidents that have received the most media attention have proven to be false, but the media keeps rushing for a story and the public is keeps eating it up without regard for evidence. |
Would you be saying the same thing if the boy’s lawyer posted an apology? Doubtful |