Labor Sec. Acosta accused of helping Jeffrey Epstein beat sex trafficking charges

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If it comes out that Trump is implicated in this, would that be a red line for Trump supporters, including those in the Senate?

They don’t HAVE a red line. They will find a way to dismiss this too. They are lost forever.

So the same band of idiots who came up with Pizzagate (an alleged sex ring of young boys) are dismissing this actual sex predator and sex ring.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If it comes out that Trump is implicated in this, would that be a red line for Trump supporters, including those in the Senate?

You realize that Trump banned Epstein from his club because he sexually assaulted a young girl?

"Trump banned Epstein from his Mar-a-Lago Club in Palm Beach “because Epstein sexually assaulted an underage girl at the club,” Bradley Edwards, an attorney who represents three of the young women, said in court documents."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/labor-nominee-acosta-cut-deal-with-billionaire-in-sex-abuse-case-involving-40-underage-girls/2017/03/21/d33271a8-0d85-11e7-ab07-07d9f521f6b5_story.html?utm_term=.5b2a6298f686

This is good.

Good. Trump, for all his horrific flaws, is not one to back of from deliberate action. I would not in the least be surprised if he came out looking better than Democratic establishment players in this particular story.

He won't. He was implicated in a suit by an accuser with witnesses. The suit was dropped because of threats, but the statue of limitations is not expired.

Yup. And Trump’s 23 and counting accusers of sexual assault say hi.

He’s a man of action all right. You might want to rephrase and work on your honesty and ethics, uptjread poster. Maybe get a therapist, while you’re at it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If it comes out that Trump is implicated in this, would that be a red line for Trump supporters, including those in the Senate?

You realize that Trump banned Epstein from his club because he sexually assaulted a young girl?

"Trump banned Epstein from his Mar-a-Lago Club in Palm Beach “because Epstein sexually assaulted an underage girl at the club,” Bradley Edwards, an attorney who represents three of the young women, said in court documents."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/labor-nominee-acosta-cut-deal-with-billionaire-in-sex-abuse-case-involving-40-underage-girls/2017/03/21/d33271a8-0d85-11e7-ab07-07d9f521f6b5_story.html?utm_term=.5b2a6298f686

This is good.

Good. Trump, for all his horrific flaws, is not one to back of from deliberate action. I would not in the least be surprised if he came out looking better than Democratic establishment players in this particular story.

He won't. He was implicated in a suit by an accuser with witnesses. The suit was dropped because of threats, but the statue of limitations is not expired.

Yup. And Trump’s 23 and counting accusers of sexual assault say hi.

He’s a man of action all right. You might want to rephrase and work on your honesty and ethics, uptjread poster. Maybe get a therapist, while you’re at it.

I despise Trump, but I'm willing to wager that Democrats are going to come out looking much worse in the Epstein saga. Except for Acosta - he really does take the cake.

[Anonymous]

Go read the Hawker article from several years ago. Trump, Dersh, Clinton, Prince Andrew were all implicated. They should all rot in hell.

And Acosta should resign today.

It really doesn't matter which "party" this looks bad for. Everyone should demand justice for these, now, women.

[Anonymous]

Gawker, not Hawker.

[Anonymous]

PP. Stop.

Every Democrat I know, and I’m one, want Clinton and Dershowitz to get nailed for this. You’ve got no goddamned evidence that Trump will “look better,” particularly given Acosta’s appointment.


You aren’t cute. Give it up.

[Anonymous]

I wouldn't be so quick to think Trump is unscathed. Where there's smoke there's usually fire.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YWnUzvlqpB0

[Anonymous]

The Republicans have to get someone else to run in 2020.

[Anonymous]

https://www.thedailybeast.com/inside-donald-trumps-one-stop-parties-attendees-recall-cocaine-and-very-young-models

I mean, tip of the iceberg.

How much do we want to bet that Trump's modelling 'agency" is related?

How much do we want to bet that Epstein was a "billionaire" because he extorted his clients?

[Anonymous]

PP. Stop.

Every Democrat I know, and I’m one, want Clinton and Dershowitz to get nailed for this. You’ve got no goddamned evidence that Trump will “look better,” particularly given Acosta’s appointment.


You aren’t cute. Give it up.

Exactly. Trump knew all about this and he appointed Acosta. Let that sink in.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://www.thedailybeast.com/inside-donald-trumps-one-stop-parties-attendees-recall-cocaine-and-very-young-models

I mean, tip of the iceberg.

How much do we want to bet that Trump's modelling 'agency" is related?

How much do we want to bet that Epstein was a "billionaire" because he extorted his clients?

This was part of Julie Brown’s reporting. There is NO evidence Epstein earned a fortune legitimately in “secret” hedge management. He was no big deal at GS. He wasn’t Steven Cohen but he’s leading a Steven Cohen lifestyle? It makes no sense unless the income is tied to sex trafficking and payments to hide that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

PP. Stop.

Every Democrat I know, and I’m one, want Clinton and Dershowitz to get nailed for this. You’ve got no goddamned evidence that Trump will “look better,” particularly given Acosta’s appointment.


You aren’t cute. Give it up.

Exactly. Trump knew all about this and he appointed Acosta. Let that sink in.

Trump didn't "know" about it. It was a core feature of WHY he was appointed. Just about everyone in his administration is compromised in one form or another. Don McGahn's dad was involved with the Philly mob that Donald dealt with in AC. Barr has Russian ties. DeVos is Erik Prince's sister. Wilbur Ross ran the bank in Cyprus that laundered a lot of the money that ended up going through Trump's properties. I mean come on!

At this point, Rick Perry is likely the most honorable among them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

PP. Stop.

Every Democrat I know, and I’m one, want Clinton and Dershowitz to get nailed for this. You’ve got no goddamned evidence that Trump will “look better,” particularly given Acosta’s appointment.


You aren’t cute. Give it up.

Exactly. Trump knew all about this and he appointed Acosta. Let that sink in.

Trump didn't "know" about it. It was a core feature of WHY he was appointed. Just about everyone in his administration is compromised in one form or another. Don McGahn's dad was involved with the Philly mob that Donald dealt with in AC. Barr has Russian ties. DeVos is Erik Prince's sister. Wilbur Ross ran the bank in Cyprus that laundered a lot of the money that ended up going through Trump's properties. I mean come on!

At this point, Rick Perry is likely the most honorable among them.

This should be a sticky. Dude. THANK YOU. I’m sick of the incessant f-cking lies on this board.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Go read the Hawker article from several years ago. Trump, Dersh, Clinton, Prince Andrew were all implicated. They should all rot in hell.

And Acosta should resign today.

It really doesn't matter which "party" this looks bad for. Everyone should demand justice for these, now, women.

These slimeballs are too rich and powerful for anything to happen to them. Surprised with everything Epstein has done that nobody's father or brother has kicked the crap out of him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If it comes out that Trump is implicated in this, would that be a red line for Trump supporters, including those in the Senate?

You realize that Trump banned Epstein from his club because he sexually assaulted a young girl?

"Trump banned Epstein from his Mar-a-Lago Club in Palm Beach “because Epstein sexually assaulted an underage girl at the club,” Bradley Edwards, an attorney who represents three of the young women, said in court documents."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/labor-nominee-acosta-cut-deal-with-billionaire-in-sex-abuse-case-involving-40-underage-girls/2017/03/21/d33271a8-0d85-11e7-ab07-07d9f521f6b5_story.html?utm_term=.5b2a6298f686

This is good.

Good. Trump, for all his horrific flaws, is not one to back of from deliberate action. I would not in the least be surprised if he came out looking better than Democratic establishment players in this particular story.

He won't. He was implicated in a suit by an accuser with witnesses. The suit was dropped because of threats, but the statue of limitations is not expired.

Yup. And Trump’s 23 and counting accusers of sexual assault say hi.

He’s a man of action all right. You might want to rephrase and work on your honesty and ethics, uptjread poster. Maybe get a therapist, while you’re at it.

I despise Trump, but I'm willing to wager that Democrats are going to come out looking much worse in the Epstein saga. Except for Acosta - he really does take the cake.

The Democrats look worse than Epstein?! Why are you defending a convicted pedophile?!