9th Grade Muslim student arrested for making a homemade clock fro school project

[Anonymous]

A seven year old boy got suspended for throwing an imaginary grenade in a box with pretend evil forces inside. BWHAHAHHAAA. Liberals are hilarious!

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:I think it was a set up in the part of the boy and his dad. His interviews have been interesting

Right, a Muslim can't be mistreated. But, if a Muslim is mistreated, he must've brought it upon himself as some part of a evil scheme. That's those scheming Muslims for you.

It is really shocking how little shame you have in displaying your Islamophobia.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:A seven year old boy got suspended for throwing an imaginary grenade in a box with pretend evil forces inside. BWHAHAHHAAA. Liberals are hilarious!

I'm sure that was a scheme cooked up with the imaginary voices in your head.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
A little boy got in serious trouble for bringing in a Lego gun from one of those TINY action Lego figures. The gun was maybe the size of a man's thumbnail. How on earth could anyone mistake that as a real gun? The school went WAY over the top on this, yes. The engineering teacher's word should have held. But to justify the idea of a tiny little toy gun or a pop tart gun, while panning this incident exposes the real reason why pop-tart guns matter - indoctrination.

I don't know about the Lego gun incident. I do know that the boy who got in trouble because of the poptart gun didn't get in trouble because people thought he had a real gun.

"As much as the parents want this case to be about a 'gun,' it is, rather, a case about classroom disruption from a student who has had a long history of disruptive behavior," Nussbaum wrote in his opinion, which was dated June 26, the Washington Post reported. He asserted that the suspension came as a result of disciplinary problems the boy had, and not just because of what he did with the breakfast pastry.

"Had the student chewed his cereal bar into the shape of a cat and ran around the room, disrupting the classroom and making 'meow' cat sounds, the result would have been exactly the same," Nussbaum wrote, according to the Post.

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/examiner-recommends-school-board-uphold-pop-tart-suspension/

I just read about the Lego gun incident and agree, that reaction by the school was outrageous and I don't support it.

Yet these type of incidents continue without liberal outrage.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
A little boy got in serious trouble for bringing in a Lego gun from one of those TINY action Lego figures. The gun was maybe the size of a man's thumbnail. How on earth could anyone mistake that as a real gun? The school went WAY over the top on this, yes. The engineering teacher's word should have held. But to justify the idea of a tiny little toy gun or a pop tart gun, while panning this incident exposes the real reason why pop-tart guns matter - indoctrination.

I don't know about the Lego gun incident. I do know that the boy who got in trouble because of the poptart gun didn't get in trouble because people thought he had a real gun.

"As much as the parents want this case to be about a 'gun,' it is, rather, a case about classroom disruption from a student who has had a long history of disruptive behavior," Nussbaum wrote in his opinion, which was dated June 26, the Washington Post reported. He asserted that the suspension came as a result of disciplinary problems the boy had, and not just because of what he did with the breakfast pastry.

"Had the student chewed his cereal bar into the shape of a cat and ran around the room, disrupting the classroom and making 'meow' cat sounds, the result would have been exactly the same," Nussbaum wrote, according to the Post.

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/examiner-recommends-school-board-uphold-pop-tart-suspension/

I just read about the Lego gun incident and agree, that reaction by the school was outrageous and I don't support it.

Yet these type of incidents continue without liberal outrage.

It got more than enough attention from liberal media.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
A little boy got in serious trouble for bringing in a Lego gun from one of those TINY action Lego figures. The gun was maybe the size of a man's thumbnail. How on earth could anyone mistake that as a real gun? The school went WAY over the top on this, yes. The engineering teacher's word should have held. But to justify the idea of a tiny little toy gun or a pop tart gun, while panning this incident exposes the real reason why pop-tart guns matter - indoctrination.

I don't know about the Lego gun incident. I do know that the boy who got in trouble because of the poptart gun didn't get in trouble because people thought he had a real gun.

"As much as the parents want this case to be about a 'gun,' it is, rather, a case about classroom disruption from a student who has had a long history of disruptive behavior," Nussbaum wrote in his opinion, which was dated June 26, the Washington Post reported. He asserted that the suspension came as a result of disciplinary problems the boy had, and not just because of what he did with the breakfast pastry.

"Had the student chewed his cereal bar into the shape of a cat and ran around the room, disrupting the classroom and making 'meow' cat sounds, the result would have been exactly the same," Nussbaum wrote, according to the Post.

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/examiner-recommends-school-board-uphold-pop-tart-suspension/

I just read about the Lego gun incident and agree, that reaction by the school was outrageous and I don't support it.

Yet these type of incidents continue without liberal outrage.

It got more than enough attention from liberal media.

Proof?

[Anonymous]

Can you imagine what would hit the fan if this boy had a gun shaped pop tart in that clock case ?

BTW, if his clock is so innocent, let's see him carry that through an airport TSA check.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Can you imagine what would hit the fan if this boy had a gun shaped pop tart in that clock case ?

BTW, if his clock is so innocent, let's see him carry that through an airport TSA check.

Maybe the TSA in Irving TX.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Can you imagine what would hit the fan if this boy had a gun shaped pop tart in that clock case ?

BTW, if his clock is so innocent, let's see him carry that through an airport TSA check.

They have explosive checks at TSA checkpoints. Have you ever had your hands swabbed at TSA? Clock would have passed through fine at TSA.

Government isn't as ignorant as the mass of racist goobers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can you imagine what would hit the fan if this boy had a gun shaped pop tart in that clock case ?

BTW, if his clock is so innocent, let's see him carry that through an airport TSA check.

Maybe the TSA in Irving TX.

I think if you created something from an electronics kit with wires and a timer, it would be carefully scrutinized by TSA. Try it sometime.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can you imagine what would hit the fan if this boy had a gun shaped pop tart in that clock case ?

BTW, if his clock is so innocent, let's see him carry that through an airport TSA check.

They have explosive checks at TSA checkpoints. Have you ever had your hands swabbed at TSA? Clock would have passed through fine at TSA.

Government isn't as ignorant as the mass of racist goobers.

But it would have been INVESTIGATED, as it was.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it was a set up in the part of the boy and his dad. His interviews have been interesting

Right, a Muslim can't be mistreated. But, if a Muslim is mistreated, he must've brought it upon himself as some part of a evil scheme. That's those scheming Muslims for you.

It is really shocking how little shame you have in displaying your Islamophobia.

I was on your page yesterday. After listening to what this kid is saying in his media whirlwind, it's making me think otherwise.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A seven year old boy got suspended for throwing an imaginary grenade in a box with pretend evil forces inside. BWHAHAHHAAA. Liberals are hilarious!

I'm sure that was a scheme cooked up with the imaginary voices in your head.

Me and the Huff Post:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/05/colorado-alex-evans-suspended-imaginary-grenade_n_2625409.html

"Evans was playing a game of his own making, called "rescue the world," when he tossed the imaginary grenade into a make-believe box filled with something evil, making explosion sound effects, the station reports.

The school's principal, Valerie Lara-Black, reportedly called Watkins Friday afternoon to inform her of Evans' suspension, confirming that the second-grader did not have anything in his hand at the time, according to the Loveland Reporter-Herald."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can you imagine what would hit the fan if this boy had a gun shaped pop tart in that clock case ?

BTW, if his clock is so innocent, let's see him carry that through an airport TSA check.

Maybe the TSA in Irving TX.

I think if you created something from an electronics kit with wires and a timer, it would be carefully scrutinized by TSA. Try it sometime.

OF course it would be. But would they put handcuffs on a 14-year-old or just tell him he couldn't take his contraption on the plane? Would he get a three-day suspension from school?

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it was a set up in the part of the boy and his dad. His interviews have been interesting

Right, a Muslim can't be mistreated. But, if a Muslim is mistreated, he must've brought it upon himself as some part of a evil scheme. That's those scheming Muslims for you.

It is really shocking how little shame you have in displaying your Islamophobia.

Agree - it's really amazing how some people can twist events to fit their conspiracy scenarios. If dad is articulate and involved in social issues, that means that dad and the boy set it up. Yeah, right.