
Is admissions based on the ability to determine meritocracy or testocracy? |
If you know of black/Hispanic applicants who qualified for AIME and rejected by TJ, maybe you can point them out. Make it easier, if you know of any black/Hispanic kid who qualified for AIME in middle school, please share that knowledge sine you have so much information on black and Hispanic kids rejected who "have had as much aptitude." As for being "more interested in TJ", I don't think one can adequately and objectively say one applicant is more interested or less interested. They are all interested in TJ. |
Supposedly meritocracy since the applicant must submit longer essay, Student Information Sheet ( another set of 6 or 7 short essays), 2 teacher recommendations in addition to GPA and test scores. |
What about ESL applicants? |
Too bad for ESL applicants. They are out of luck. |
+1 |
So artogant. No wonder applications to TJ are declining and some of the Asian students there are arrogant braggarts. |
so you think they should switch to aptitude tests? I know, rename it the Advanced Aptitude Program. |
You are the one with reading comprehension problem and you can't even spell arrogance properly. PP is the one obsessed about the race of the applicant and making statements he/she can't back up. Anybody that disagrees with you and you can't respond in an intelligent manner is "artogant." Pathetic. No wonder our education system is going down the toilet. You think only Asians are braggarts? Braggarts come in all shapes and sizes. |
That wouldn't change a thing; might even make it worse. |
Qualifying for aime has not taken a wild jump to giving kid credit for the rigor of the aime itself...this is going down the rabbit hole and hitting every root on the way down |
+1 |
The kid qualified to take the AIME because he did very well on the AMC 10 or AMC 12. That is what AIME qualifier is. What is odd about that? You cannot just take AIME because you want to. You have earn that right by performing very well on AMC. |
Right, pushing you agenda of claiming prejudice while using one Asian student, when the admissions statistics clearly show no such prejudice agains t Asians, has now gotten you to the point of justifying your pet 'victim' by giving them credit for the rigor of the aime test..qualifying to take the test is not the same as getting a perfect score - you're defensively conflating the student and the test. |
Regardless of whether there are too many Asians or not, rejecting a clearly qualified applicant is wrong especially if the applicant appears to be more qualified than most admitted students. It has nothing to do with race of the applicant. Also, AIME qualifier is someone who does so well on AMC test that he/she is qualified to take the AIME test. Nothing confusing about that. |