Whose Airstrike Bombed a Girls’ School in Iran? The U.S. Says It’s Still Investigating.

[Anonymous]

Minab martyrdom planned, by the IRGC.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Minab martyrdom planned, by the IRGC.

Give it up with your delusional takes

All military experts and OSINT (including the CIA OSINT accounts) accounts have come to the same conclusion that the school was indeed struck by US Tomahawk missiles.

The US attacked a civilian structure. It happens. A lot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yup looks like we the Americans killed a school of little girls.

https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/us-investigation-points-likely-us-responsibility-iran-school-strike-sources-say-2026-03-06/

Exclusive: US investigation points to likely US responsibility in Iran school strike, sources say
By Phil Stewart and Idrees Ali

No it was the Iranians. Trump said the Iranians inaccurate weapons double tapped the school.

Do you have a more legitimate source than Reuters for this? Trump lies daily.

The Iranians play chess we play GTA.

That may be your opinion, but Reuters is quoting Pentagon sources who say that the US is responsible for bombing these little girls to death.

Funny that you didn't post your source. This is what they're actually saying:

"U.S. military investigators believe it is likely that U.S. forces were responsible for an apparent ​strike on an Iranian girls' school that killed scores of children on Saturday but have not yet reached a final conclusion or completed their investigation, ‌two U.S. officials told Reuters.

The officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive military matters, did not rule ​out the possibility that new evidence could emerge that absolves the U.S. of responsibility and point to another responsible party in the incident.

https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/us-investigation-points-likely-us-responsibility-iran-school-strike-sources-say-2026-03-06/

Additionally, if it turns out the U.S. was responsible (and the jury's still out on that, as you can see), that doesn't mean it was intentional. The school is right next to the naval base, which *was* the target.

Who said the US intentionally killed the little girls? I am not happy with what my country is doing in Iran, but I don't think we've descended to the level of sociopaths. I do however think there's an increased level of incomptence at the Pentagon such that they would mistake a school for a naval base and kill so many children.

It doesn't matter whether it was intentional or not. What matters is that there will be no accountability for it, and that makes the question of intent irrelevant.

What accountability is Iran offering up for the murder of tens of thousands of its own people? They just appointed a senior leadership figure to the group that did all that killing to be their Supreme Leader. And here you are, completely whitewashing what happened, refusing to acknowledge it and are only demanding accountability from the US. It's dishonest of you and you know it. If the US needs to take accountability (and I'd be more than happy to see Hegseth impeached and removed) then so too does the Supreme Leader on down. Can you say the same about Mojtaba Khameini and the IRGC and Basij leadership? And can you not deflect with dishonest BS about "that's what they want you to believe?"

So what I'm reading you say is that it is okay to kill elementary school girl students if they happen to live in a regime governed by a Supreme Leader. If they were daughters of the regime that had accountability, then you would have objected to their death with full vigor. But in the absence of that, you will not, because the fact that these girl children are daughters of a regime run by Mojtaba Khameini makes them an acceptable, unregrettable target.

That is very good to know, to have this clarity of thought.

"Clarity of thought" - that's ludicrous, coming from you. You’re being willfully dishonest, are grossly misrepresenting what everyone else is saying and are NOT AT ALL arguing in good faith.

No one here said it was "okay" to kill kids, and you know that. NOBODY said that. That's a straight up lie on your part. What kind of "clear thought" allows outright lies?

What was actually said was that Iran’s leadership has spent years murdering its own people with total impunity, and that any conversation about accountability has to include their actions too. You’ve twisted that into a claim that children are legitimate targets, which is something nobody here ever said, never implied, and certainly not something I would ever defend. So you need to apologize for that - which is ironic considering you are going around demanding apologies from everyone else. You can apologize for your lies and bad faith distortions.

Your argument only works if you erase the actual words and replace them with a cartoon villain version of what you wish we’d said. That’s not debate. That’s fabrication.

Here’s the reality you’re dodging:

Iran’s regime has killed tens of thousands of its own citizens.

The Basij and IRGC have beaten, shot, tortured, and disappeared protesters, including minors.

The new Supreme Leader was chosen from the same apparatus that ordered and carried out those killings.

Pointing out that history is not "whitewashing" anything it’s acknowledging the FULL moral landscape at play. You’re the one selectively applying outrage by pretending only one side has transgressions and moral obligations.

If you want to argue the strike was wrong, fine. That’s a legitimate moral position and guess what - the rest of us agree that striking a school is wrong. That's not even the point here.

Your continual dishonest accusing others of endorsing the killing of children is a dishonest smear designed to shut down discussion instead of engaging with what was actually said.

You don’t get to win an argument by inventing a position for the rest of us and then attacking your own strawman. If you want to continue this conversation, start by responding to the arguments actually being made by posters, not your own dishonest fabrications. But if you want to refuse to acknowledge your dishonest tactics and to stick with your fabrications then you need to absolutely own the fact that you are a dishonest troll who does not deserve any honest engagement.

I love how you think you’re entitled to impose rules regarding when it’s acceptable to pursue accountability.

Who TF are you?

And where have I seen such entitlement before?

In the mirror? The PP is absolutely right. Own your constant dishonesty, hyperbole, exaggeration and flat-out lies. No need to engage with trolls.

You’re a moron. The diseased scourge of Zionism, which has inflicted incalculable damage on American interests for many decades now, is finally crippled and gradually dying. Thank god.

Here we go again, accusing everyone of being "Zionists" and "diseased" and wishing death on posters... while refusing to engage honestly, falsely accusing others of saying "it's OK to kill kids" and refusing to actually engage on legitimate and substantive points other posters are making.

Truly an unhinged troll. I hate Trump but you're pretty damn awful yourself. Almost makes me want to side with Trump. Almost. But at this point there's nothing that would want to make me side with the unhinged troll here.

Where’s the wishing death on posters part in the previous post?

Oh perhaps the bit about celebrating America crippled and dying, etc.

Re-read it. I’ll wait.

Zionism crippling and dying (which is what was posted) isn’t the same as America crippling and dying, despite your persistent, unwelcome efforts to link the former to the latter.

Moreover, celebrating the demise of an ideology (Zionism) is NOT wishing death on posters, you lying sack of trash.

But the fact that you have intentionally distorted what was posted and attempted to silence others just about says it all regarding your agenda …

[Anonymous]

Another Mai Lai massacre. Truly a dark stain on America's soul.

We've exported murdering children in our schools. Imagine how pissed you'd be if a foreign country blew up an entire elementary school where your little Johnny and Suzie go.

I can't stand being American anymore. Constantly bombing goat herders, school kids, and civilians. Trillions down the toilet to do so while our roads and bridges fall apart, we have no high speed rail, and we have the worst healthcare in the world. We live in a disaster of a country.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Minab martyrdom planned, by the IRGC.

Give it up with your delusional takes

All military experts and OSINT (including the CIA OSINT accounts) accounts have come to the same conclusion that the school was indeed struck by US Tomahawk missiles.

The US attacked a civilian structure. It happens. A lot.

DP

Iran having military infrastructure directly adjacent to a school is a Geneva Convention Article 58 violation. Iran deliberately and willfully did this quite a bit all throughout their cities, putting IRGC and Basij bases and facilities in dense urban areas. As did Hamas. This happened systematically throughout Iranian and Gazan cities. It was a deliberate and illegal choice that put civilians at risk.

Also, OSINT accounts DO NOT confirm there being a "deliberate double tap on a school" - aerial photos show direct hits on IRGC military targets. When one looks at Bellingcat's own geolocation analysis of the "double tap tomahawk" video, it shows the missile coming in to the left of the school, not at the school itself. And from the camera's viewpoint what''s to the left is the IRGC base. What's being portrayed as a "double tap on the school" is far more likely collateral from a legitimate IRGC target being hit. This scenario is exactly why the Geneva Conventions said military infrastructure should not be directly adjacent to civilian infrastructure.

Also, while it's fine to condemn the US for hitting civilian infrastructure, why don't you give us a comparison of how much civilian infrastructure the US hit in this campaign compared to how much civilian infrastructure Iran has hit with its missiles? What's the percentage? Do you actually believe that Iran has had precision strikes that only hit legitimate military targets, that Iran has not hit a single residential area or civilian target in the area? Iran has launched over 1000 ballistic missiles including Khorramshahr and Sejjil missiles, up to half of which contain between 24 and 80 poorly guided submunitions that disperse over a multi-KM radius which have hit hospitals, schools, residential areas, civilian infrastructure and so on. But the PP's narrative completely ignores this, instead the suggestion is Iran is an innocent victim, doing nothing to anybody, while its children are being deliberately massacred. All based on one school in a building that used to be a military facility.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Another Mai Lai massacre. Truly a dark stain on America's soul.

We've exported murdering children in our schools. Imagine how pissed you'd be if a foreign country blew up an entire elementary school where your little Johnny and Suzie go.

I can't stand being American anymore. Constantly bombing goat herders, school kids, and civilians. Trillions down the toilet to do so while our roads and bridges fall apart, we have no high speed rail, and we have the worst healthcare in the world. We live in a disaster of a country.

The problem isn't America. The problem is the current deranged leadership. We need to get rid of Trump and neocons.

And I wish Iran could do the same - but they don't even have free and fair elections.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yup looks like we the Americans killed a school of little girls.

https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/us-investigation-points-likely-us-responsibility-iran-school-strike-sources-say-2026-03-06/

Exclusive: US investigation points to likely US responsibility in Iran school strike, sources say
By Phil Stewart and Idrees Ali

No it was the Iranians. Trump said the Iranians inaccurate weapons double tapped the school.

Do you have a more legitimate source than Reuters for this? Trump lies daily.

The Iranians play chess we play GTA.

That may be your opinion, but Reuters is quoting Pentagon sources who say that the US is responsible for bombing these little girls to death.

Funny that you didn't post your source. This is what they're actually saying:

"U.S. military investigators believe it is likely that U.S. forces were responsible for an apparent ​strike on an Iranian girls' school that killed scores of children on Saturday but have not yet reached a final conclusion or completed their investigation, ‌two U.S. officials told Reuters.

The officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive military matters, did not rule ​out the possibility that new evidence could emerge that absolves the U.S. of responsibility and point to another responsible party in the incident.

https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/us-investigation-points-likely-us-responsibility-iran-school-strike-sources-say-2026-03-06/

Additionally, if it turns out the U.S. was responsible (and the jury's still out on that, as you can see), that doesn't mean it was intentional. The school is right next to the naval base, which *was* the target.

Who said the US intentionally killed the little girls? I am not happy with what my country is doing in Iran, but I don't think we've descended to the level of sociopaths. I do however think there's an increased level of incomptence at the Pentagon such that they would mistake a school for a naval base and kill so many children.

It doesn't matter whether it was intentional or not. What matters is that there will be no accountability for it, and that makes the question of intent irrelevant.

What accountability is Iran offering up for the murder of tens of thousands of its own people? They just appointed a senior leadership figure to the group that did all that killing to be their Supreme Leader. And here you are, completely whitewashing what happened, refusing to acknowledge it and are only demanding accountability from the US. It's dishonest of you and you know it. If the US needs to take accountability (and I'd be more than happy to see Hegseth impeached and removed) then so too does the Supreme Leader on down. Can you say the same about Mojtaba Khameini and the IRGC and Basij leadership? And can you not deflect with dishonest BS about "that's what they want you to believe?"

So what I'm reading you say is that it is okay to kill elementary school girl students if they happen to live in a regime governed by a Supreme Leader. If they were daughters of the regime that had accountability, then you would have objected to their death with full vigor. But in the absence of that, you will not, because the fact that these girl children are daughters of a regime run by Mojtaba Khameini makes them an acceptable, unregrettable target.

That is very good to know, to have this clarity of thought.

"Clarity of thought" - that's ludicrous, coming from you. You’re being willfully dishonest, are grossly misrepresenting what everyone else is saying and are NOT AT ALL arguing in good faith.

No one here said it was "okay" to kill kids, and you know that. NOBODY said that. That's a straight up lie on your part. What kind of "clear thought" allows outright lies?

What was actually said was that Iran’s leadership has spent years murdering its own people with total impunity, and that any conversation about accountability has to include their actions too. You’ve twisted that into a claim that children are legitimate targets, which is something nobody here ever said, never implied, and certainly not something I would ever defend. So you need to apologize for that - which is ironic considering you are going around demanding apologies from everyone else. You can apologize for your lies and bad faith distortions.

Your argument only works if you erase the actual words and replace them with a cartoon villain version of what you wish we’d said. That’s not debate. That’s fabrication.

Here’s the reality you’re dodging:

Iran’s regime has killed tens of thousands of its own citizens.

The Basij and IRGC have beaten, shot, tortured, and disappeared protesters, including minors.

The new Supreme Leader was chosen from the same apparatus that ordered and carried out those killings.

Pointing out that history is not "whitewashing" anything it’s acknowledging the FULL moral landscape at play. You’re the one selectively applying outrage by pretending only one side has transgressions and moral obligations.

If you want to argue the strike was wrong, fine. That’s a legitimate moral position and guess what - the rest of us agree that striking a school is wrong. That's not even the point here.

Your continual dishonest accusing others of endorsing the killing of children is a dishonest smear designed to shut down discussion instead of engaging with what was actually said.

You don’t get to win an argument by inventing a position for the rest of us and then attacking your own strawman. If you want to continue this conversation, start by responding to the arguments actually being made by posters, not your own dishonest fabrications. But if you want to refuse to acknowledge your dishonest tactics and to stick with your fabrications then you need to absolutely own the fact that you are a dishonest troll who does not deserve any honest engagement.

I love how you think you’re entitled to impose rules regarding when it’s acceptable to pursue accountability.

Who TF are you?

And where have I seen such entitlement before?

In the mirror? The PP is absolutely right. Own your constant dishonesty, hyperbole, exaggeration and flat-out lies. No need to engage with trolls.

You’re a moron. The diseased scourge of Zionism, which has inflicted incalculable damage on American interests for many decades now, is finally crippled and gradually dying. Thank god.

Here we go again, accusing everyone of being "Zionists" and "diseased" and wishing death on posters... while refusing to engage honestly, falsely accusing others of saying "it's OK to kill kids" and refusing to actually engage on legitimate and substantive points other posters are making.

Truly an unhinged troll. I hate Trump but you're pretty damn awful yourself. Almost makes me want to side with Trump. Almost. But at this point there's nothing that would want to make me side with the unhinged troll here.

Where’s the wishing death on posters part in the previous post?

Oh perhaps the bit about celebrating America crippled and dying, etc.

Re-read it. I’ll wait.

Zionism crippling and dying (which is what was posted) isn’t the same as America crippling and dying, despite your persistent, unwelcome efforts to link the former to the latter.

Moreover, celebrating the demise of an ideology (Zionism) is NOT wishing death on posters, you lying sack of trash.

But the fact that you have intentionally distorted what was posted and attempted to silence others just about says it all regarding your agenda …

That's mighty rich coming from the lying sack of shit who kept distorting anything anyone else said into "it's OK to kill kids." Along with falsely accusing anyone who questions or disagrees with them of automatically being "Zionist" - the very thing you wish death on. So yes, you are wishing death on posters.

[Anonymous]

Just ur routine reminder: every accusation is basically a confession.

Israeli shows Israeli school being used as military base: "The reserves are using it pretty much as a base."

https://x.com/abierkhatib/status/2031575054366933401

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Minab martyrdom planned, by the IRGC.

Give it up with your delusional takes

All military experts and OSINT (including the CIA OSINT accounts) accounts have come to the same conclusion that the school was indeed struck by US Tomahawk missiles.

The US attacked a civilian structure. It happens. A lot.

DP

Iran having military infrastructure directly adjacent to a school is a Geneva Convention Article 58 violation. Iran deliberately and willfully did this quite a bit all throughout their cities, putting IRGC and Basij bases and facilities in dense urban areas. As did Hamas. This happened systematically throughout Iranian and Gazan cities. It was a deliberate and illegal choice that put civilians at risk.

Also, OSINT accounts DO NOT confirm there being a "deliberate double tap on a school" - aerial photos show direct hits on IRGC military targets. When one looks at Bellingcat's own geolocation analysis of the "double tap tomahawk" video, it shows the missile coming in to the left of the school, not at the school itself. And from the camera's viewpoint what''s to the left is the IRGC base. What's being portrayed as a "double tap on the school" is far more likely collateral from a legitimate IRGC target being hit. This scenario is exactly why the Geneva Conventions said military infrastructure should not be directly adjacent to civilian infrastructure.

Also, while it's fine to condemn the US for hitting civilian infrastructure, why don't you give us a comparison of how much civilian infrastructure the US hit in this campaign compared to how much civilian infrastructure Iran has hit with its missiles? What's the percentage? Do you actually believe that Iran has had precision strikes that only hit legitimate military targets, that Iran has not hit a single residential area or civilian target in the area? Iran has launched over 1000 ballistic missiles including Khorramshahr and Sejjil missiles, up to half of which contain between 24 and 80 poorly guided submunitions that disperse over a multi-KM radius which have hit hospitals, schools, residential areas, civilian infrastructure and so on. But the PP's narrative completely ignores this, instead the suggestion is Iran is an innocent victim, doing nothing to anybody, while its children are being deliberately massacred. All based on one school in a building that used to be a military facility.

Mayne this is news to you, but there are schools on our military bases. Daycares, hospitals, elderly care facilities, civilian housing, all located on military bases! Enough with the excuses. What we did was wrong.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Minab martyrdom planned, by the IRGC.

Give it up with your delusional takes

All military experts and OSINT (including the CIA OSINT accounts) accounts have come to the same conclusion that the school was indeed struck by US Tomahawk missiles.

The US attacked a civilian structure. It happens. A lot.

DP

Iran having military infrastructure directly adjacent to a school is a Geneva Convention Article 58 violation. Iran deliberately and willfully did this quite a bit all throughout their cities, putting IRGC and Basij bases and facilities in dense urban areas. As did Hamas. This happened systematically throughout Iranian and Gazan cities. It was a deliberate and illegal choice that put civilians at risk.

Also, OSINT accounts DO NOT confirm there being a "deliberate double tap on a school" - aerial photos show direct hits on IRGC military targets. When one looks at Bellingcat's own geolocation analysis of the "double tap tomahawk" video, it shows the missile coming in to the left of the school, not at the school itself. And from the camera's viewpoint what''s to the left is the IRGC base. What's being portrayed as a "double tap on the school" is far more likely collateral from a legitimate IRGC target being hit. This scenario is exactly why the Geneva Conventions said military infrastructure should not be directly adjacent to civilian infrastructure.

Also, while it's fine to condemn the US for hitting civilian infrastructure, why don't you give us a comparison of how much civilian infrastructure the US hit in this campaign compared to how much civilian infrastructure Iran has hit with its missiles? What's the percentage? Do you actually believe that Iran has had precision strikes that only hit legitimate military targets, that Iran has not hit a single residential area or civilian target in the area? Iran has launched over 1000 ballistic missiles including Khorramshahr and Sejjil missiles, up to half of which contain between 24 and 80 poorly guided submunitions that disperse over a multi-KM radius which have hit hospitals, schools, residential areas, civilian infrastructure and so on. But the PP's narrative completely ignores this, instead the suggestion is Iran is an innocent victim, doing nothing to anybody, while its children are being deliberately massacred. All based on one school in a building that used to be a military facility.

Mayne this is news to you, but there are schools on our military bases. Daycares, hospitals, elderly care facilities, civilian housing, all located on military bases! Enough with the excuses. What we did was wrong.

Sure sure only America is wrong. Iran is never wrong. Sure. As long as you keep only trashing America it's just going to keep turning Americans off to your rhetoric. You aren't going to win anyone over.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Minab martyrdom planned, by the IRGC.

Give it up with your delusional takes

All military experts and OSINT (including the CIA OSINT accounts) accounts have come to the same conclusion that the school was indeed struck by US Tomahawk missiles.

The US attacked a civilian structure. It happens. A lot.

DP

Iran having military infrastructure directly adjacent to a school is a Geneva Convention Article 58 violation. Iran deliberately and willfully did this quite a bit all throughout their cities, putting IRGC and Basij bases and facilities in dense urban areas. As did Hamas. This happened systematically throughout Iranian and Gazan cities. It was a deliberate and illegal choice that put civilians at risk.

Also, OSINT accounts DO NOT confirm there being a "deliberate double tap on a school" - aerial photos show direct hits on IRGC military targets. When one looks at Bellingcat's own geolocation analysis of the "double tap tomahawk" video, it shows the missile coming in to the left of the school, not at the school itself. And from the camera's viewpoint what''s to the left is the IRGC base. What's being portrayed as a "double tap on the school" is far more likely collateral from a legitimate IRGC target being hit. This scenario is exactly why the Geneva Conventions said military infrastructure should not be directly adjacent to civilian infrastructure.

Also, while it's fine to condemn the US for hitting civilian infrastructure, why don't you give us a comparison of how much civilian infrastructure the US hit in this campaign compared to how much civilian infrastructure Iran has hit with its missiles? What's the percentage? Do you actually believe that Iran has had precision strikes that only hit legitimate military targets, that Iran has not hit a single residential area or civilian target in the area? Iran has launched over 1000 ballistic missiles including Khorramshahr and Sejjil missiles, up to half of which contain between 24 and 80 poorly guided submunitions that disperse over a multi-KM radius which have hit hospitals, schools, residential areas, civilian infrastructure and so on. But the PP's narrative completely ignores this, instead the suggestion is Iran is an innocent victim, doing nothing to anybody, while its children are being deliberately massacred. All based on one school in a building that used to be a military facility.

So you're saying we're no better than the Iranian terror state. Sounds about right.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Just ur routine reminder: every accusation is basically a confession.

Israeli shows Israeli school being used as military base: "The reserves are using it pretty much as a base."

https://x.com/abierkhatib/status/2031575054366933401

Iran does it and you are apparently totally fine with anything Iran does so why the outrage if anyone else does it?

Also, Russia bombed hundreds of schools all throughout Ukraine and the world stood by silently and did nothing. I seriously doubt the outraged "They bombed an Iranian school" poster posted anything at all about that in any of the threads here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Minab martyrdom planned, by the IRGC.

Give it up with your delusional takes

All military experts and OSINT (including the CIA OSINT accounts) accounts have come to the same conclusion that the school was indeed struck by US Tomahawk missiles.

The US attacked a civilian structure. It happens. A lot.

DP

Iran having military infrastructure directly adjacent to a school is a Geneva Convention Article 58 violation. Iran deliberately and willfully did this quite a bit all throughout their cities, putting IRGC and Basij bases and facilities in dense urban areas. As did Hamas. This happened systematically throughout Iranian and Gazan cities. It was a deliberate and illegal choice that put civilians at risk.

Also, OSINT accounts DO NOT confirm there being a "deliberate double tap on a school" - aerial photos show direct hits on IRGC military targets. When one looks at Bellingcat's own geolocation analysis of the "double tap tomahawk" video, it shows the missile coming in to the left of the school, not at the school itself. And from the camera's viewpoint what''s to the left is the IRGC base. What's being portrayed as a "double tap on the school" is far more likely collateral from a legitimate IRGC target being hit. This scenario is exactly why the Geneva Conventions said military infrastructure should not be directly adjacent to civilian infrastructure.

Also, while it's fine to condemn the US for hitting civilian infrastructure, why don't you give us a comparison of how much civilian infrastructure the US hit in this campaign compared to how much civilian infrastructure Iran has hit with its missiles? What's the percentage? Do you actually believe that Iran has had precision strikes that only hit legitimate military targets, that Iran has not hit a single residential area or civilian target in the area? Iran has launched over 1000 ballistic missiles including Khorramshahr and Sejjil missiles, up to half of which contain between 24 and 80 poorly guided submunitions that disperse over a multi-KM radius which have hit hospitals, schools, residential areas, civilian infrastructure and so on. But the PP's narrative completely ignores this, instead the suggestion is Iran is an innocent victim, doing nothing to anybody, while its children are being deliberately massacred. All based on one school in a building that used to be a military facility.

So you're saying we're no better than the Iranian terror state. Sounds about right.

Who's this "we" you keep talking about?
You do know that Trump and Hegseth are temporary and don't represent the will of a majority of Americans anymore, right? You do know we don't have forever regimes and rulers for life like the Ayatollahs, right?

If you want to lump YOURSELF in with Trump and Hegseth, go right ahead. If you are in favor of an Ayatollah-style rule-for-life regime in the US, that's all you. But you DO NOT speak for me. Stop saying "we" and "our."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just ur routine reminder: every accusation is basically a confession.

Israeli shows Israeli school being used as military base: "The reserves are using it pretty much as a base."

https://x.com/abierkhatib/status/2031575054366933401

Iran does it and you are apparently totally fine with anything Iran does so why the outrage if anyone else does it?

Also, Russia bombed hundreds of schools all throughout Ukraine and the world stood by silently and did nothing. I seriously doubt the outraged "They bombed an Iranian school" poster posted anything at all about that in any of the threads here.

I have yet to find a single major social media pundit leading the outrage commentary about Minab who also condemned the Russian bombing of schools in Ukraine for the last 5 years. Why is that?

[Anonymous]

These are the last 10 days of Ramadan and the odd nights are considered very holy.

The families spent the first odd night in the cemetery with their dead children. The pictures that have come out are heart-breaking.

We are truly a barbaric and perverted, nation but somehow there is justice in this universe. What comes around goes around. Don’t be surprised if you experience this type of profound grief in your life that we are inflicting on others.