President Joe Biden diagnosed with prostate cancer

[Anonymous]

You didn’t read it.

[Anonymous]

How codified are state funerals for presidents.

This is already the weirdest reaction to a cancer diagnosis. Seems like there’s momentum to snub him in death should it comes to that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Diagnosis and the treatment so fast.

That they already know what treatment to provide, means he has been getting tested.

Pffft. It means he got a same-day biopsy because he was previously a President.

Same day biopsy doesn't tell you what treatment to provide. They need testing across time, to see the changes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wishing Biden a full and speedy recovery so he can be tried at the Hague as a Co-defendant in this Holocaust.

Omg…lmao.

Seriously, people, this is maga. This is all Reagan’s fault for destroying the mental health system in the 1980s.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wishing Biden a full and speedy recovery so he can be tried at the Hague as a Co-defendant in this Holocaust.

Omg…lmao.

Seriously, people, this is maga. This is all Reagan’s fault for destroying the mental health system in the 1980s.

MAGA are so angry and always looking for someone to blame for self-inflicted problems.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, it could have gone undetected. Even for a president. Real oncologists weigh in:


https://www.barrons.com/news/how-biden-cancer-diagnosis-could-have-gone-undetected-1594b89b

Metastatic and in the bones. That doesn't happen quickly.

The actual oncologists in the article say you're wrong, but I'm sure you know best.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Over 13 pages (should be 23, but Jeff is shredding this thread) on Biden getting cancer, yet only a few posts on Zek Emmanuel convinced he had it for years. Why is that dcum? Isn't Zek the hero of Obamacare?

Here is Zeke Emmanuel. He is also an oncologist, so he knows what he is talking about.
So, he is saying he has had this cancer for years - probably at least at the start of his presidency. So, either the doctors totally missed this, or Biden, et al, have kept this a secret from the public.

Irresponsible and unprofessional. He has not treated Biden.

Good Lord, woman. He is an oncologist. He understands the progression of the disease. Other oncologists have gone on record saying the same thing.

You don't go from cancer-free to late-stage, aggressive prostate cancer in a few months.

Nope, just basic professional responsibility and ethics. They have to say they are speculating because they haven’t treated him. Fundamental.

I realize MAGA isn’t at all familiar with professionalism and ethics, so I’m
not surprised that they’re jumping on this opportunity. But shame on this doctor and the news org for being so desperate for attention that they’re acting like a gossip rag. They know better.

DP

Ok then, you can explain how a patient goes from “no mention of prostate cancer” to “Stage IV metastatic prostate cancer” in 12 months.

It’s a fair question. Because that’s not how prostrate cancer works.

Someone has been lying for years about this. Years.



So…. Who?

Again, they don’t require the test after 70. Just like women don’t get yearly Pap smear after 65.

“Require” a test after 70? Sweetheart he’s not on Cigna or Blue Cross like the rest of us.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Diagnosis and the treatment so fast.

That they already know what treatment to provide, means he has been getting tested.

Pffft. It means he got a same-day biopsy because he was previously a President.

Same day biopsy doesn't tell you what treatment to provide. They need testing across time, to see the changes.

And the bone mets require other scans.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Over 13 pages (should be 23, but Jeff is shredding this thread) on Biden getting cancer, yet only a few posts on Zek Emmanuel convinced he had it for years. Why is that dcum? Isn't Zek the hero of Obamacare?

Here is Zeke Emmanuel. He is also an oncologist, so he knows what he is talking about.
So, he is saying he has had this cancer for years - probably at least at the start of his presidency. So, either the doctors totally missed this, or Biden, et al, have kept this a secret from the public.

Irresponsible and unprofessional. He has not treated Biden.

Good Lord, woman. He is an oncologist. He understands the progression of the disease. Other oncologists have gone on record saying the same thing.

You don't go from cancer-free to late-stage, aggressive prostate cancer in a few months.

Nope, just basic professional responsibility and ethics. They have to say they are speculating because they haven’t treated him. Fundamental.

I realize MAGA isn’t at all familiar with professionalism and ethics, so I’m
not surprised that they’re jumping on this opportunity. But shame on this doctor and the news org for being so desperate for attention that they’re acting like a gossip rag. They know better.

DP

Ok then, you can explain how a patient goes from “no mention of prostate cancer” to “Stage IV metastatic prostate cancer” in 12 months.

It’s a fair question. Because that’s not how prostrate cancer works.

Someone has been lying for years about this. Years.



So…. Who?

Again, they don’t require the test after 70. Just like women don’t get yearly Pap smear after 65.

“Require” a test after 70? Sweetheart he’s not on Cigna or Blue Cross like the rest of us.

But if he never reported any symptoms, his doctors probably just stopped testing after a certain time. I do think he was probably having symptoms as president, but as a lot of people do - he downplayed them or wrote them off as normal aging until it was too late. If he reported his symptoms I’m sure he would have been thoroughly tested.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Over 13 pages (should be 23, but Jeff is shredding this thread) on Biden getting cancer, yet only a few posts on Zek Emmanuel convinced he had it for years. Why is that dcum? Isn't Zek the hero of Obamacare?

Here is Zeke Emmanuel. He is also an oncologist, so he knows what he is talking about.
So, he is saying he has had this cancer for years - probably at least at the start of his presidency. So, either the doctors totally missed this, or Biden, et al, have kept this a secret from the public.

Irresponsible and unprofessional. He has not treated Biden.

Good Lord, woman. He is an oncologist. He understands the progression of the disease. Other oncologists have gone on record saying the same thing.

You don't go from cancer-free to late-stage, aggressive prostate cancer in a few months.

Nope, just basic professional responsibility and ethics. They have to say they are speculating because they haven’t treated him. Fundamental.

I realize MAGA isn’t at all familiar with professionalism and ethics, so I’m
not surprised that they’re jumping on this opportunity. But shame on this doctor and the news org for being so desperate for attention that they’re acting like a gossip rag. They know better.

DP

Ok then, you can explain how a patient goes from “no mention of prostate cancer” to “Stage IV metastatic prostate cancer” in 12 months.

It’s a fair question. Because that’s not how prostrate cancer works.

Someone has been lying for years about this. Years.



So…. Who?

Put down the Koolaid, and focus on something more distressing. Why don’t you focus on how the felon had the election rigged? How we just paid $5M to a traitor. How the felon cut cancer research, or accepted a $4M bribe. Nothing that anyone can say re Biden will satisfy you, and you might do well to wonder why.

FFS, stop making everything about Trump. This has nothing to do with Trump. There’s hundreds of Trump threads you can post in. This one has nothing to do with him.

MAGA won’t post in those threads. You don’t like those threads about him taking away your rights (and access to cancer research, cleaner drinking water), when you could be outraged here. Also, it’s laughable that you think anyone was discussing Trump during the Biden years, except for the topic of 1/6 traitors when the news showed that another America-hater was rightfully jailed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, it could have gone undetected. Even for a president. Real oncologists weigh in:


https://www.barrons.com/news/how-biden-cancer-diagnosis-could-have-gone-undetected-1594b89b

MAGA knows a lot about hiding slow cancers lol. Rot to the brain.

Metastatic and in the bones. That doesn't happen quickly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's clear to me, after watching this presser today, that this release is coordinated and the Dem machine is doubling down on their own failure(s)

It’s clear to me, after seeing MAGA go insane with this news, that they’re deflecting from the president’s grift, the gutting of Medicaid and cancer research, and sending immigrants to torture prisons for life.

It’s also clear that MAGA will cease to exist when Biden does. They are fueled by hatred of Biden, so I’ll watch the veneer get worn down.

Don’t forget Hilary, Obama and Kamala and the list goes on and on. Hate is what fuels these people.

Ahhh... So it's love that's expressed on this forum for Reagan and the two George Bushes?

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, it could have gone undetected. Even for a president. Real oncologists weigh in:


https://www.barrons.com/news/how-biden-cancer-diagnosis-could-have-gone-undetected-1594b89b

Metastatic and in the bones. That doesn't happen quickly.

The actual oncologists in the article say you're wrong, but I'm sure you know best.

You'd have to define quickly. Sometimes it takes years.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wishing Biden a full and speedy recovery so he can be tried at the Hague as a Co-defendant in this Holocaust.

Omg…lmao.

Seriously, people, this is maga. This is all Reagan’s fault for destroying the mental health system in the 1980s.

Didn't know that wanting justice for war criminal makes you MAGA

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Over 13 pages (should be 23, but Jeff is shredding this thread) on Biden getting cancer, yet only a few posts on Zek Emmanuel convinced he had it for years. Why is that dcum? Isn't Zek the hero of Obamacare?

Here is Zeke Emmanuel. He is also an oncologist, so he knows what he is talking about.
So, he is saying he has had this cancer for years - probably at least at the start of his presidency. So, either the doctors totally missed this, or Biden, et al, have kept this a secret from the public.

Irresponsible and unprofessional. He has not treated Biden.

Good Lord, woman. He is an oncologist. He understands the progression of the disease. Other oncologists have gone on record saying the same thing.

You don't go from cancer-free to late-stage, aggressive prostate cancer in a few months.

Nope, just basic professional responsibility and ethics. They have to say they are speculating because they haven’t treated him. Fundamental.

I realize MAGA isn’t at all familiar with professionalism and ethics, so I’m
not surprised that they’re jumping on this opportunity. But shame on this doctor and the news org for being so desperate for attention that they’re acting like a gossip rag. They know better.

DP

Ok then, you can explain how a patient goes from “no mention of prostate cancer” to “Stage IV metastatic prostate cancer” in 12 months.

It’s a fair question. Because that’s not how prostrate cancer works.

Someone has been lying for years about this. Years.



So…. Who?

Again, they don’t require the test after 70. Just like women don’t get yearly Pap smear after 65.

“Require” a test after 70? Sweetheart he’s not on Cigna or Blue Cross like the rest of us.

The guidance isn't about cost savings. There's a point when that information is useless.