Pitt Jolie FINALLY reach divorce settlement

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder how much $$ she got. James Cameron and Linda has a whopping 50 million settlement for their 2 year marriage. She didn't get that much but it's a pretty penny

Nowhere near that much money. They were only married for two years and Brad is nowhere near as rich as James Cameron.

But they were living together and raising six children ten years prior to the marriage.

Linda didn't have a prenup. Brad and Angelina had a prenup.

I doubt they did or the financial portion would've been a breeze

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder how much $$ she got. James Cameron and Linda has a whopping 50 million settlement for their 2 year marriage. She didn't get that much but it's a pretty penny

Nowhere near that much money. They were only married for two years and Brad is nowhere near as rich as James Cameron.

But they were living together and raising six children ten years prior to the marriage.

Linda didn't have a prenup. Brad and Angelina had a prenup.

I doubt they did or the financial portion would've been a breeze

Of course they did.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder how much $$ she got. James Cameron and Linda has a whopping 50 million settlement for their 2 year marriage. She didn't get that much but it's a pretty penny

Nowhere near that much money. They were only married for two years and Brad is nowhere near as rich as James Cameron.

But they were living together and raising six children ten years prior to the marriage.

It doesn’t count. The only property she was entitled to is half of the earnings he made during their two-year marriage.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If you read past the headline, you’ll see they added all she’s received since they split in 2016: the $67 mil she got for the winery sale, $11 mil for a Churchill painting he gifted her which she sold at auction and so on. Not additional monies from the divorce settlement.

She came out of the marriage much richer than she entered it. And she made his life a living h*ll. The article is right she put him through the ringer by constantly trashing him in the press, keeping him away from his children, and selling his beloved winery to a business partner that she knew he didn’t want. She has some nerve playing the victim and acting as if she has been wronged. She has been on a never-ending mission to destroy her ex since she filed for divorce.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you read past the headline, you’ll see they added all she’s received since they split in 2016: the $67 mil she got for the winery sale, $11 mil for a Churchill painting he gifted her which she sold at auction and so on. Not additional monies from the divorce settlement.

She came out of the marriage much richer than she entered it. And she made his life a living h*ll. The article is right she put him through the ringer by constantly trashing him in the press, keeping him away from his children, and selling his beloved winery to a business partner that she knew he didn’t want. She has some nerve playing the victim and acting as if she has been wronged. She has been on a never-ending mission to destroy her ex since she filed for divorce.

"Keeping his children away" you sound delusional. How is this not a pr bot when you're just copying his words?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder how much $$ she got. James Cameron and Linda has a whopping 50 million settlement for their 2 year marriage. She didn't get that much but it's a pretty penny

Nowhere near that much money. They were only married for two years and Brad is nowhere near as rich as James Cameron.

But they were living together and raising six children ten years prior to the marriage.

It doesn’t count. The only property she was entitled to is half of the earnings he made during their two-year marriage.

Plus retroactive child support, which would be substantial in the case of six kids at Pitt's wealth level.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you read past the headline, you’ll see they added all she’s received since they split in 2016: the $67 mil she got for the winery sale, $11 mil for a Churchill painting he gifted her which she sold at auction and so on. Not additional monies from the divorce settlement.

She came out of the marriage much richer than she entered it. And she made his life a living h*ll. The article is right she put him through the ringer by constantly trashing him in the press, keeping him away from his children, and selling his beloved winery to a business partner that she knew he didn’t want. She has some nerve playing the victim and acting as if she has been wronged. She has been on a never-ending mission to destroy her ex since she filed for divorce.

"Keeping his children away" you sound delusional. How is this not a pr bot when you're just copying his words?

He tried to gain 50/50 custody of the children. She fought him in court to deny him any custody of the kids. Even after he win 50/50 custody, she got the private judge in the case disqualified. She’s a horrible mother who purposely destroyed her children’s relationships with their father.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder how much $$ she got. James Cameron and Linda has a whopping 50 million settlement for their 2 year marriage. She didn't get that much but it's a pretty penny

Nowhere near that much money. They were only married for two years and Brad is nowhere near as rich as James Cameron.

But they were living together and raising six children ten years prior to the marriage.

Linda didn't have a prenup. Brad and Angelina had a prenup.

I doubt they did or the financial portion would've been a breeze

It probably only covered premarital assets. They had combined investments plus I think figuring out marital income for things like production companies which have a lot of upfront costs but then backend revenue that comes in over years is a total nightmare. They both have production companies I think. Reasonable people would just come up with a number and walk away. But it’s hard when they can’t be reasonable.
A friend had a divorce where her husband had founded a company that was hard to value because of uncertain future income stream (IP invention stuff) and the divorce dragged out for years because no one knew how to split the value and he was low balling her (after balling someone else).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you read past the headline, you’ll see they added all she’s received since they split in 2016: the $67 mil she got for the winery sale, $11 mil for a Churchill painting he gifted her which she sold at auction and so on. Not additional monies from the divorce settlement.

She came out of the marriage much richer than she entered it. And she made his life a living h*ll. The article is right she put him through the ringer by constantly trashing him in the press, keeping him away from his children, and selling his beloved winery to a business partner that she knew he didn’t want. She has some nerve playing the victim and acting as if she has been wronged. She has been on a never-ending mission to destroy her ex since she filed for divorce.

You are really a delusional fool, or you think others are. To think, a man with Pitt's financial, political, and public stature could not have access to his children. People with far, far less have shared custody and visiting and some of those people are undeniably no-shat parents and partners. Jolie could not legally keep him away from his children. In fact, he was granted access from the court, and he did Pitt did not follow through. It is truly disingenuous to blame the mother when the father does not show up for visitation rights. It was not Jolie's responsibility to get her children to Pitt. It was Pitt, the parent, to get to his children. He did not show up at this baby girl's Broadway production. All, he had to do was buy a ticket to the show. He has not appeared in Atlanta for his oldest daughter for any of her big days. He did not need Jolie's permission to go to parent's day, homecoming, high school graduation, etc. When he was supposed to be spending time with the twins, Brad chose to be in Europe to work on a film. Stop blaming mothers for the bad-behavior of deadbeat fathers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you read past the headline, you’ll see they added all she’s received since they split in 2016: the $67 mil she got for the winery sale, $11 mil for a Churchill painting he gifted her which she sold at auction and so on. Not additional monies from the divorce settlement.

She came out of the marriage much richer than she entered it. And she made his life a living h*ll. The article is right she put him through the ringer by constantly trashing him in the press, keeping him away from his children, and selling his beloved winery to a business partner that she knew he didn’t want. She has some nerve playing the victim and acting as if she has been wronged. She has been on a never-ending mission to destroy her ex since she filed for divorce.

"Keeping his children away" you sound delusional. How is this not a pr bot when you're just copying his words?

He tried to gain 50/50 custody of the children. She fought him in court to deny him any custody of the kids. Even after he win 50/50 custody, she got the private judge in the case disqualified. She’s a horrible mother who purposely destroyed her children’s relationships with their father.

She asked for the judge to be disqualified before the trial ever started. The verdict from the judges lay the timeline out. He never asked for more custody because he wouldn't be favored anymore.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you read past the headline, you’ll see they added all she’s received since they split in 2016: the $67 mil she got for the winery sale, $11 mil for a Churchill painting he gifted her which she sold at auction and so on. Not additional monies from the divorce settlement.

She came out of the marriage much richer than she entered it. And she made his life a living h*ll. The article is right she put him through the ringer by constantly trashing him in the press, keeping him away from his children, and selling his beloved winery to a business partner that she knew he didn’t want. She has some nerve playing the victim and acting as if she has been wronged. She has been on a never-ending mission to destroy her ex since she filed for divorce.

You are really a delusional fool, or you think others are. To think, a man with Pitt's financial, political, and public stature could not have access to his children. People with far, far less have shared custody and visiting and some of those people are undeniably no-shat parents and partners. Jolie could not legally keep him away from his children. In fact, he was granted access from the court, and he did Pitt did not follow through. It is truly disingenuous to blame the mother when the father does not show up for visitation rights. It was not Jolie's responsibility to get her children to Pitt. It was Pitt, the parent, to get to his children. He did not show up at this baby girl's Broadway production. All, he had to do was buy a ticket to the show. He has not appeared in Atlanta for his oldest daughter for any of her big days. He did not need Jolie's permission to go to parent's day, homecoming, high school graduation, etc. When he was supposed to be spending time with the twins, Brad chose to be in Europe to work on a film. Stop blaming mothers for the bad-behavior of deadbeat fathers.

🙌🏻🙌🏻 thank you!!! He can send out PR stories about how happy he is with his gf, but he can't send one about being proud of Vivienne? There was a ET article on IG from hi source saying something like "everyone who knows Brad knows he was a good father!" Yeah everyone but your kids?! The top comments were all calling it out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you read past the headline, you’ll see they added all she’s received since they split in 2016: the $67 mil she got for the winery sale, $11 mil for a Churchill painting he gifted her which she sold at auction and so on. Not additional monies from the divorce settlement.

She came out of the marriage much richer than she entered it. And she made his life a living h*ll. The article is right she put him through the ringer by constantly trashing him in the press, keeping him away from his children, and selling his beloved winery to a business partner that she knew he didn’t want. She has some nerve playing the victim and acting as if she has been wronged. She has been on a never-ending mission to destroy her ex since she filed for divorce.

You are really a delusional fool, or you think others are. To think, a man with Pitt's financial, political, and public stature could not have access to his children. People with far, far less have shared custody and visiting and some of those people are undeniably no-shat parents and partners. Jolie could not legally keep him away from his children. In fact, he was granted access from the court, and he did Pitt did not follow through. It is truly disingenuous to blame the mother when the father does not show up for visitation rights. It was not Jolie's responsibility to get her children to Pitt. It was Pitt, the parent, to get to his children. He did not show up at this baby girl's Broadway production. All, he had to do was buy a ticket to the show. He has not appeared in Atlanta for his oldest daughter for any of her big days. He did not need Jolie's permission to go to parent's day, homecoming, high school graduation, etc. When he was supposed to be spending time with the twins, Brad chose to be in Europe to work on a film. Stop blaming mothers for the bad-behavior of deadbeat fathers.

We have no idea if he’s seen his kids. He doesn’t parade them around like Jolie. And we know some of his kids were at his beach house (I think celebrating grandma 80 bday) and his nieces took them back home when the week was over. Jolie served them lunch.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you read past the headline, you’ll see they added all she’s received since they split in 2016: the $67 mil she got for the winery sale, $11 mil for a Churchill painting he gifted her which she sold at auction and so on. Not additional monies from the divorce settlement.

She came out of the marriage much richer than she entered it. And she made his life a living h*ll. The article is right she put him through the ringer by constantly trashing him in the press, keeping him away from his children, and selling his beloved winery to a business partner that she knew he didn’t want. She has some nerve playing the victim and acting as if she has been wronged. She has been on a never-ending mission to destroy her ex since she filed for divorce.

You are really a delusional fool, or you think others are. To think, a man with Pitt's financial, political, and public stature could not have access to his children. People with far, far less have shared custody and visiting and some of those people are undeniably no-shat parents and partners. Jolie could not legally keep him away from his children. In fact, he was granted access from the court, and he did Pitt did not follow through. It is truly disingenuous to blame the mother when the father does not show up for visitation rights. It was not Jolie's responsibility to get her children to Pitt. It was Pitt, the parent, to get to his children. He did not show up at this baby girl's Broadway production. All, he had to do was buy a ticket to the show. He has not appeared in Atlanta for his oldest daughter for any of her big days. He did not need Jolie's permission to go to parent's day, homecoming, high school graduation, etc. When he was supposed to be spending time with the twins, Brad chose to be in Europe to work on a film. Stop blaming mothers for the bad-behavior of deadbeat fathers.

We have no idea if he’s seen his kids. He doesn’t parade them around like Jolie. And we know some of his kids were at his beach house (I think celebrating grandma 80 bday) and his nieces took them back home when the week was over. Jolie served them lunch.

Also, supposedly missed BAFTA awards when he was winning Oscar due to Zaharas’ surprised surgery.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you read past the headline, you’ll see they added all she’s received since they split in 2016: the $67 mil she got for the winery sale, $11 mil for a Churchill painting he gifted her which she sold at auction and so on. Not additional monies from the divorce settlement.

She came out of the marriage much richer than she entered it. And she made his life a living h*ll. The article is right she put him through the ringer by constantly trashing him in the press, keeping him away from his children, and selling his beloved winery to a business partner that she knew he didn’t want. She has some nerve playing the victim and acting as if she has been wronged. She has been on a never-ending mission to destroy her ex since she filed for divorce.

You are really a delusional fool, or you think others are. To think, a man with Pitt's financial, political, and public stature could not have access to his children. People with far, far less have shared custody and visiting and some of those people are undeniably no-shat parents and partners. Jolie could not legally keep him away from his children. In fact, he was granted access from the court, and he did Pitt did not follow through. It is truly disingenuous to blame the mother when the father does not show up for visitation rights. It was not Jolie's responsibility to get her children to Pitt. It was Pitt, the parent, to get to his children. He did not show up at this baby girl's Broadway production. All, he had to do was buy a ticket to the show. He has not appeared in Atlanta for his oldest daughter for any of her big days. He did not need Jolie's permission to go to parent's day, homecoming, high school graduation, etc. When he was supposed to be spending time with the twins, Brad chose to be in Europe to work on a film. Stop blaming mothers for the bad-behavior of deadbeat fathers.

We have no idea if he’s seen his kids. He doesn’t parade them around like Jolie. And we know some of his kids were at his beach house (I think celebrating grandma 80 bday) and his nieces took them back home when the week was over. Jolie served them lunch.

Sure.

[Anonymous]

He did not show up at this baby girl's Broadway production. All, he had to do was buy a ticket to the show.

That's Angelina's production, who are we kidding And that happened in 2024; after all the damage was already done.