Trump today and MAGA still claiming Harris never worked at McDonald’s

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Her single mother's finances were tight in Montreal, but wasn't her mother's new job in California a huge promotion, coinciding with Kamala transferring to pricey private Howard University? Yet we're to believe the first thing Harris did in California was disregard her and her mom's Hindu faith and go work a servant job serving up beef burgers and fries cooked in beef tallow? If the family finances were so dire in California, why did she transfer to an expensive private college on the other side of the country? A 20 year old university student with an upper caste academic mom working a servant labor job around flunkies and high school kids sounds far fetched.

And if the McDonald's job self-funded the private Howard education and flights home, she'd be proud of it and have evidence of the gig. She would have quickly received promotions. The franchise owner and McDonald's corporate would be tripping over themselves to prove this.


Employment. Records. Are. Typically. Tossed. After. Three. Years.


McDonald's corporate boasts about each and every famous person who worked there going back to the 1950s and 60s. Kamala Harris is the only famous person ever in which literally zero proof exists she ever ate there, let alone worked there in the 80s. Please stop digging this hole. She lied. She got caught. The end.


From the New York Times:


Ms. Harris’s campaign said that she was an employee of the McDonald’s on Central Avenue in Alameda, Calif., in 1983 during the summer after her freshman year at Howard University, working the cash register, french-fry station and ice cream machine. It has provided little information beyond that, including how long she worked there. She also mentioned her job at McDonald’s when she ran for president in 2019.



So.... she worked there during a summer break. For 4 months.

I worked at an AMC Theater and do have pictures, because the high school yearbook came and photographed us (I got a lot of my friends jobs there).

Otherwise, I would not have photos of the job from 1977. Now my friends could vouch for me for that job.

But I worked a job in college for 8 months.... I could not name any of those people, and would have no proof I worked there. I did not take pictures. It was in a copy center. I don't have paystubs or any other proof, either.


This. I worked a retail store 25 years ago and cannot name the people I worked with. Doubt they could name me. Stood at the cash register, did my job, went home.


If you become one of the most famous persons in the world, all of your co-workers, managers, and store owner would come forward.


Without hesitation, would NOT come forward when it's MAGA types putting you on the spot. Nope.


McDonald's corporate eagerly wishes they could prove this is true. They can't. You think they wanted to admit yesterday in an official statement they can't prove it? They wish they could have boasted about her working at x location for x months.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Companies typically only keep employment records for 3 years and people are expecting McDonalds to have records from 40 years ago?

Or have saved their own paper tax records that old?!?!

Hahahahahaha


Actually it’s 7 years for employment records but also McD’s are franchises so corporate McD would have nothing.
I’m surprised she doesn’t just produce her social security record though—I’m pretty sure they show where you worked in a particular year.

No, it shows how much you made in a particular year, not who paid you.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Anyone else think this was a bizarre call of mcdonalds?
As a democrat it put me off to have them be complicit in trolling harris. We sometimes get fast food after the kids have a soccer tournament and yesterday i was a hard no on mcds. f them.


McDonalds got sucked into a lose-lose situation. Either the acquiesce Trump and piss off Harris supporters, or they deny Trump's photo op, and then Kid Rock will start posting videos of him shooting up big macs with an AR15.
Anonymous
"Stolen McValor" lol
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Her single mother's finances were tight in Montreal, but wasn't her mother's new job in California a huge promotion, coinciding with Kamala transferring to pricey private Howard University? Yet we're to believe the first thing Harris did in California was disregard her and her mom's Hindu faith and go work a servant job serving up beef burgers and fries cooked in beef tallow? If the family finances were so dire in California, why did she transfer to an expensive private college on the other side of the country? A 20 year old university student with an upper caste academic mom working a servant labor job around flunkies and high school kids sounds far fetched.

And if the McDonald's job self-funded the private Howard education and flights home, she'd be proud of it and have evidence of the gig. She would have quickly received promotions. The franchise owner and McDonald's corporate would be tripping over themselves to prove this.


Employment. Records. Are. Typically. Tossed. After. Three. Years.


McDonald's corporate boasts about each and every famous person who worked there going back to the 1950s and 60s. Kamala Harris is the only famous person ever in which literally zero proof exists she ever ate there, let alone worked there in the 80s. Please stop digging this hole. She lied. She got caught. The end.


From the New York Times:


Ms. Harris’s campaign said that she was an employee of the McDonald’s on Central Avenue in Alameda, Calif., in 1983 during the summer after her freshman year at Howard University, working the cash register, french-fry station and ice cream machine. It has provided little information beyond that, including how long she worked there. She also mentioned her job at McDonald’s when she ran for president in 2019.



So.... she worked there during a summer break. For 4 months.

I worked at an AMC Theater and do have pictures, because the high school yearbook came and photographed us (I got a lot of my friends jobs there).

Otherwise, I would not have photos of the job from 1977. Now my friends could vouch for me for that job.

But I worked a job in college for 8 months.... I could not name any of those people, and would have no proof I worked there. I did not take pictures. It was in a copy center. I don't have paystubs or any other proof, either.


This. I worked a retail store 25 years ago and cannot name the people I worked with. Doubt they could name me. Stood at the cash register, did my job, went home.


DP and the insinuation that she would have photos? Before cell phones? At some crappy job? No, that is laughable.


Funny that you bring up cell phones. It was also during long-distance phones calls. It was very expensive to call Montreal from California in the 80s. Yet Kamala's only third-party witness to her Mickey D's job is an old Montreal friend who allegedly heard about the job from Kamala's mom. So Kamala's academic mom, not Kamala herself, was randomly calling 19 or 20 year old old friends of Kamala to tell then about her daughter's new job? Sure, sure. And this friend will only answer media questions via email.


Here's my frank answer: In the competition of "who lies the most" Trump wins without any doubt.

So I don't honestly give two sh*ts to bark up this tree.


It's not the lie, it's the cover up. Kamala, her team, and you toadies are digging a hole here. She should have just blamed the white lie on a ghost writer or something.


And Trump hasn't had cover ups for his 8 billion lies, every time the wind blows? And you just put your head in the sand because it's Trump?

Once again, quite frankly, I don't give a flying eff if Harris did lie.
Anonymous
MAGA desperately trying to deflect from the fact that their rapidly deteriorating convict has been bowing out of appearances.
Anonymous
To summarize yet again for the slow-witted:

It's comical that the MAGAs claim (without evidence) that Kamala Harris "lied" about working at a McDonalds.

Yet here we now have proof that Trump went to a McDonalds that was closed for business during his visit, where he did some cosplay and play-acted at working for the cameras, with actors pretending to be customers.

You have no evidence that Kamala lied. Yet we now have evidence that Trump lied.

Seems like deep hypocrisy and a major backfire to any thinking person.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Her single mother's finances were tight in Montreal, but wasn't her mother's new job in California a huge promotion, coinciding with Kamala transferring to pricey private Howard University? Yet we're to believe the first thing Harris did in California was disregard her and her mom's Hindu faith and go work a servant job serving up beef burgers and fries cooked in beef tallow? If the family finances were so dire in California, why did she transfer to an expensive private college on the other side of the country? A 20 year old university student with an upper caste academic mom working a servant labor job around flunkies and high school kids sounds far fetched.

And if the McDonald's job self-funded the private Howard education and flights home, she'd be proud of it and have evidence of the gig. She would have quickly received promotions. The franchise owner and McDonald's corporate would be tripping over themselves to prove this.


Employment. Records. Are. Typically. Tossed. After. Three. Years.


McDonald's corporate boasts about each and every famous person who worked there going back to the 1950s and 60s. Kamala Harris is the only famous person ever in which literally zero proof exists she ever ate there, let alone worked there in the 80s. Please stop digging this hole. She lied. She got caught. The end.


From the New York Times:


Ms. Harris’s campaign said that she was an employee of the McDonald’s on Central Avenue in Alameda, Calif., in 1983 during the summer after her freshman year at Howard University, working the cash register, french-fry station and ice cream machine. It has provided little information beyond that, including how long she worked there. She also mentioned her job at McDonald’s when she ran for president in 2019.



So.... she worked there during a summer break. For 4 months.

I worked at an AMC Theater and do have pictures, because the high school yearbook came and photographed us (I got a lot of my friends jobs there).

Otherwise, I would not have photos of the job from 1977. Now my friends could vouch for me for that job.

But I worked a job in college for 8 months.... I could not name any of those people, and would have no proof I worked there. I did not take pictures. It was in a copy center. I don't have paystubs or any other proof, either.


This. I worked a retail store 25 years ago and cannot name the people I worked with. Doubt they could name me. Stood at the cash register, did my job, went home.


DP and the insinuation that she would have photos? Before cell phones? At some crappy job? No, that is laughable.


Funny that you bring up cell phones. It was also during long-distance phones calls. It was very expensive to call Montreal from California in the 80s. Yet Kamala's only third-party witness to her Mickey D's job is an old Montreal friend who allegedly heard about the job from Kamala's mom. So Kamala's academic mom, not Kamala herself, was randomly calling 19 or 20 year old old friends of Kamala to tell then about her daughter's new job? Sure, sure. And this friend will only answer media questions via email.


Here's my frank answer: In the competition of "who lies the most" Trump wins without any doubt.

So I don't honestly give two sh*ts to bark up this tree.


It's not the lie, it's the cover up. Kamala, her team, and you toadies are digging a hole here. She should have just blamed the white lie on a ghost writer or something.


No evidence is ever good enough for MAGAs, they just move goalposts.

There is little evidence that could be produced when records are dumped. People want to believe she would be remembered. If my former retail co-worker from college became famous 25 years later, can't tell you I'd know them. If it involved coming forward in the face of MAGA types, wouldn't speak up even if I did. But you REALLY want to believe it's a lie so you can pretend Trump doesn't lie worse or something?

Why don't you get so angry and froth like this about Trump's lies?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Anyone else think this was a bizarre call of mcdonalds?
As a democrat it put me off to have them be complicit in trolling harris. We sometimes get fast food after the kids have a soccer tournament and yesterday i was a hard no on mcds. f them.


It's not trolling. They loved the publicity Trump just generated and would love for Harris to do the same photo op, to generated even more publicity. And they'd love nothing more than to be able to prove Harris worked for them in the 80s. They can't. They aren't going to lie about employee records to help bail out some politician who lied in a book.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Seems like deep hypocrisy and a major backfire to any thinking person.


Found your problem.
Anonymous
Kamala can't prove she's not a salt-sucking changeling from outer space, so therefore she is.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Anyone else think this was a bizarre call of mcdonalds?
As a democrat it put me off to have them be complicit in trolling harris. We sometimes get fast food after the kids have a soccer tournament and yesterday i was a hard no on mcds. f them.


McDonalds got sucked into a lose-lose situation. Either the acquiesce Trump and piss off Harris supporters, or they deny Trump's photo op, and then Kid Rock will start posting videos of him shooting up big macs with an AR15.


McDonalds offered the same photoop to Kamala and the campaign never responded.
Anonymous
3, 2, 1... before an investigative piece drops with interviews by former employees at the only two McDonald's locations in Alameda, California during the summer of 1983. Spoiler: Literally nobody will remember her ever working there.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Companies typically only keep employment records for 3 years and people are expecting McDonalds to have records from 40 years ago?

Or have saved their own paper tax records that old?!?!

Hahahahahaha


Actually it’s 7 years for employment records but also McD’s are franchises so corporate McD would have nothing.
I’m surprised she doesn’t just produce her social security record though—I’m pretty sure they show where you worked in a particular year.


Except she said she paid for college with this job. Any records would likely show a much smaller stint so it would still reveal her lying.
Forum Index » Political Discussion
Go to: