Brad Pitt and Ines de Ramon

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is Angelina catching strays when this thread isn’t even about her?

AJ looked lovely and didn’t seem to mind going solo. She got a standing ovation, her kids love her, she looks great.

Ines looks great too. A different kind of great, but great nonetheless.

Ines jumped right into a relationship with BP while divorcing so maybe they’re both just having fun? Maybe it will turn serious? Don’t think AJ cares either way…

Endless misogyny. It's so disheartening to see constant posts always attacking women in the worst way while men and their horrible behavior is ignored. Brad was violent with his wife and children and everyone gives him a pass.

We are marching back in time wrt women's rights in this country.

+1

Does Angelina get a pass for her violence?

DP. Neither gets a pass. They are both raging addicts with major issues.

It’s always funny to me when people pick sides with a crazy celebrity couple. It’s clear they are both troubled, addicted, shallow people. It’s not like a healthy Brad Pitt married crazy and had a bunch of kids with this person if he wasn’t bonkers himself.

And same for Angie. When she met Brad he was married and we now know he was a heavy daily pot smoker and drinker - he’s admitted that.

They clearly both ignored red flags.

Blinds have been saying for years the relationship had soured by 2009 but Angie insisted they stay together because of appearances and she didn’t want Aniston to be able to say told you so. So they had an open drug fueled relationship.

It’s a mess all around.

Angelina is not shallow. She is a humanitarian and an amazing mom to 6 kids who all adore her. Brad and Jen Aniston on the other hand ha e always been obsessed with their good looks and self importance. No wonder they’ll have no family to keep them company in old age.

Maybe the kids adore her in a stockholm syndrome sort of way.

And not obsessed with her looks? Lmao. She's singlehandedly kept plastic surgeons and derms in business.

+1 Not shallow? Sure, Jan. And she left her so-called humanitarian calling once Brad P was no longer bankrolling her.

That make little sense since she left the UN years after the breakup/divorce.

I think that was the point?

Which still doesn't make sense since she left a whole 6 years after their break up and still does work sith different charities.

What work does she do with different charities? Interested to learn.

Same as every other celeb or person? I know you're just trying to pick a fight and i am not interested. Brad and Angelina are two separate people. They're not forever connected in their decisions. Both sides of stans on here really need to learn that.

Okay, so none. Got it. Her finances got tight after the split, and she no longer had the Jolie-Pitt Foundation to fund her her charitable endeavors. Because of her shenanigans about the chateau and custody, Pitt wouldn't hand over the generous financial settlement she expected. She does fine on her own, but leads a very expensive lifestyle, enjoying her mansion and private jet just like the rest of them. Charities were a nice hobby and PR plus when the joint pockets were much deeper. So don't try to assert she's remotely less shallow than the rest.

What are you talking about. The Jolie-Pitt Foundation still runs..... They both were doing charity work before they met each other as after because guess what? They are not dependent on each until the ends of time.

No evidence it's active, which would be tricky post-split. It's a joint marital asset that will factor into the divorce settlement. I think she does what she can through the Maddox Jolie-Pitt Foundation, but I also think it's true she's a lot less active than she used to be and mostly looks for sponsored activities. Like the Guerlain/bees one.

You can look up it's tax papers...It's active. Brad still contributes.

Tax returns here. In 2022 only $18k in contributions, a little over a million given out. Down to just 4.5m net worth. Seems like it's gradually drawing down and will be defunct soon, which is to be expected in the event of a split.

https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/205176706

$0 contributions received in 2020 and 2021. Yeah, it's done.

Obviously not as they had contributions in 2022 and Angelina/Brad are still contributing.

There's no need for them to close it if they dont want too. It's a small foundation that helps supplement their other ones and donates to other charities. It's no one's business if Brad still wants to contributes. I don't see him paying for MIR, so let him do a good deed here.

I think she will probably like a foundation with just her name or the kids initials

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is Angelina catching strays when this thread isn’t even about her?

AJ looked lovely and didn’t seem to mind going solo. She got a standing ovation, her kids love her, she looks great.

Ines looks great too. A different kind of great, but great nonetheless.

Ines jumped right into a relationship with BP while divorcing so maybe they’re both just having fun? Maybe it will turn serious? Don’t think AJ cares either way…

Endless misogyny. It's so disheartening to see constant posts always attacking women in the worst way while men and their horrible behavior is ignored. Brad was violent with his wife and children and everyone gives him a pass.

We are marching back in time wrt women's rights in this country.

+1

Does Angelina get a pass for her violence?

DP. Neither gets a pass. They are both raging addicts with major issues.

It’s always funny to me when people pick sides with a crazy celebrity couple. It’s clear they are both troubled, addicted, shallow people. It’s not like a healthy Brad Pitt married crazy and had a bunch of kids with this person if he wasn’t bonkers himself.

And same for Angie. When she met Brad he was married and we now know he was a heavy daily pot smoker and drinker - he’s admitted that.

They clearly both ignored red flags.

Blinds have been saying for years the relationship had soured by 2009 but Angie insisted they stay together because of appearances and she didn’t want Aniston to be able to say told you so. So they had an open drug fueled relationship.

It’s a mess all around.

Angelina is not shallow. She is a humanitarian and an amazing mom to 6 kids who all adore her. Brad and Jen Aniston on the other hand ha e always been obsessed with their good looks and self importance. No wonder they’ll have no family to keep them company in old age.

Maybe the kids adore her in a stockholm syndrome sort of way.

And not obsessed with her looks? Lmao. She's singlehandedly kept plastic surgeons and derms in business.

+1 Not shallow? Sure, Jan. And she left her so-called humanitarian calling once Brad P was no longer bankrolling her.

That make little sense since she left the UN years after the breakup/divorce.

I think that was the point?

Which still doesn't make sense since she left a whole 6 years after their break up and still does work sith different charities.

What work does she do with different charities? Interested to learn.

Same as every other celeb or person? I know you're just trying to pick a fight and i am not interested. Brad and Angelina are two separate people. They're not forever connected in their decisions. Both sides of stans on here really need to learn that.

Okay, so none. Got it. Her finances got tight after the split, and she no longer had the Jolie-Pitt Foundation to fund her her charitable endeavors. Because of her shenanigans about the chateau and custody, Pitt wouldn't hand over the generous financial settlement she expected. She does fine on her own, but leads a very expensive lifestyle, enjoying her mansion and private jet just like the rest of them. Charities were a nice hobby and PR plus when the joint pockets were much deeper. So don't try to assert she's remotely less shallow than the rest.

What are you talking about. The Jolie-Pitt Foundation still runs..... They both were doing charity work before they met each other as after because guess what? They are not dependent on each until the ends of time.

No evidence it's active, which would be tricky post-split. It's a joint marital asset that will factor into the divorce settlement. I think she does what she can through the Maddox Jolie-Pitt Foundation, but I also think it's true she's a lot less active than she used to be and mostly looks for sponsored activities. Like the Guerlain/bees one.

You can look up it's tax papers...It's active. Brad still contributes.

Tax returns here. In 2022 only $18k in contributions, a little over a million given out. Down to just 4.5m net worth. Seems like it's gradually drawing down and will be defunct soon, which is to be expected in the event of a split.

https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/205176706

$0 contributions received in 2020 and 2021. Yeah, it's done.

Obviously not as they had contributions in 2022 and Angelina/Brad are still contributing.

Where is the evidence they're still contributing? The measly $18K 2022 contribution, don't think so.

They gave away over 500k in grants/contributions. It's none of your business if they both still decided to contribute their own money.

They're spending down the foundation's assets over a period of years, went from a high of more than $40m when they were together down to just $4.5m total assets now. No new contributions in recent years, as the tax returns make clear.

Expect they did indeed have a new contribution in 2022.

A tiny $18K? And you think that's from one of them?

I am not sure why you can't read who the new contributor was yourself.

I can. Are you suggesting Brad has something to do with the United Way of Nashua NH, the sole contributor?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is Angelina catching strays when this thread isn’t even about her?

AJ looked lovely and didn’t seem to mind going solo. She got a standing ovation, her kids love her, she looks great.

Ines looks great too. A different kind of great, but great nonetheless.

Ines jumped right into a relationship with BP while divorcing so maybe they’re both just having fun? Maybe it will turn serious? Don’t think AJ cares either way…

Endless misogyny. It's so disheartening to see constant posts always attacking women in the worst way while men and their horrible behavior is ignored. Brad was violent with his wife and children and everyone gives him a pass.

We are marching back in time wrt women's rights in this country.

+1

Does Angelina get a pass for her violence?

DP. Neither gets a pass. They are both raging addicts with major issues.

It’s always funny to me when people pick sides with a crazy celebrity couple. It’s clear they are both troubled, addicted, shallow people. It’s not like a healthy Brad Pitt married crazy and had a bunch of kids with this person if he wasn’t bonkers himself.

And same for Angie. When she met Brad he was married and we now know he was a heavy daily pot smoker and drinker - he’s admitted that.

They clearly both ignored red flags.

Blinds have been saying for years the relationship had soured by 2009 but Angie insisted they stay together because of appearances and she didn’t want Aniston to be able to say told you so. So they had an open drug fueled relationship.

It’s a mess all around.

Angelina is not shallow. She is a humanitarian and an amazing mom to 6 kids who all adore her. Brad and Jen Aniston on the other hand ha e always been obsessed with their good looks and self importance. No wonder they’ll have no family to keep them company in old age.

Maybe the kids adore her in a stockholm syndrome sort of way.

And not obsessed with her looks? Lmao. She's singlehandedly kept plastic surgeons and derms in business.

+1 Not shallow? Sure, Jan. And she left her so-called humanitarian calling once Brad P was no longer bankrolling her.

That make little sense since she left the UN years after the breakup/divorce.

I think that was the point?

Which still doesn't make sense since she left a whole 6 years after their break up and still does work sith different charities.

What work does she do with different charities? Interested to learn.

Same as every other celeb or person? I know you're just trying to pick a fight and i am not interested. Brad and Angelina are two separate people. They're not forever connected in their decisions. Both sides of stans on here really need to learn that.

Okay, so none. Got it. Her finances got tight after the split, and she no longer had the Jolie-Pitt Foundation to fund her her charitable endeavors. Because of her shenanigans about the chateau and custody, Pitt wouldn't hand over the generous financial settlement she expected. She does fine on her own, but leads a very expensive lifestyle, enjoying her mansion and private jet just like the rest of them. Charities were a nice hobby and PR plus when the joint pockets were much deeper. So don't try to assert she's remotely less shallow than the rest.

What are you talking about. The Jolie-Pitt Foundation still runs..... They both were doing charity work before they met each other as after because guess what? They are not dependent on each until the ends of time.

No evidence it's active, which would be tricky post-split. It's a joint marital asset that will factor into the divorce settlement. I think she does what she can through the Maddox Jolie-Pitt Foundation, but I also think it's true she's a lot less active than she used to be and mostly looks for sponsored activities. Like the Guerlain/bees one.

You can look up it's tax papers...It's active. Brad still contributes.

Tax returns here. In 2022 only $18k in contributions, a little over a million given out. Down to just 4.5m net worth. Seems like it's gradually drawing down and will be defunct soon, which is to be expected in the event of a split.

https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/205176706

$0 contributions received in 2020 and 2021. Yeah, it's done.

Obviously not as they had contributions in 2022 and Angelina/Brad are still contributing.

There's no need for them to close it if they dont want too. It's a small foundation that helps supplement their other ones and donates to other charities. It's no one's business if Brad still wants to contributes. I don't see him paying for MIR, so let him do a good deed here.

I think she will probably like a foundation with just her name or the kids initials

The MJP Foundation has always been close to her heart, and she recently said she envisions spending more time in Cambodia. I wonder if that's why Maddox hasn't legally dropped "Pitt" too, because it might not make sense to change the name of a charitable foundation that's been active for 20 years.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is Angelina catching strays when this thread isn’t even about her?

AJ looked lovely and didn’t seem to mind going solo. She got a standing ovation, her kids love her, she looks great.

Ines looks great too. A different kind of great, but great nonetheless.

Ines jumped right into a relationship with BP while divorcing so maybe they’re both just having fun? Maybe it will turn serious? Don’t think AJ cares either way…

Endless misogyny. It's so disheartening to see constant posts always attacking women in the worst way while men and their horrible behavior is ignored. Brad was violent with his wife and children and everyone gives him a pass.

We are marching back in time wrt women's rights in this country.

+1

Does Angelina get a pass for her violence?

DP. Neither gets a pass. They are both raging addicts with major issues.

It’s always funny to me when people pick sides with a crazy celebrity couple. It’s clear they are both troubled, addicted, shallow people. It’s not like a healthy Brad Pitt married crazy and had a bunch of kids with this person if he wasn’t bonkers himself.

And same for Angie. When she met Brad he was married and we now know he was a heavy daily pot smoker and drinker - he’s admitted that.

They clearly both ignored red flags.

Blinds have been saying for years the relationship had soured by 2009 but Angie insisted they stay together because of appearances and she didn’t want Aniston to be able to say told you so. So they had an open drug fueled relationship.

It’s a mess all around.

Angelina is not shallow. She is a humanitarian and an amazing mom to 6 kids who all adore her. Brad and Jen Aniston on the other hand ha e always been obsessed with their good looks and self importance. No wonder they’ll have no family to keep them company in old age.

Maybe the kids adore her in a stockholm syndrome sort of way.

And not obsessed with her looks? Lmao. She's singlehandedly kept plastic surgeons and derms in business.

+1 Not shallow? Sure, Jan. And she left her so-called humanitarian calling once Brad P was no longer bankrolling her.

That make little sense since she left the UN years after the breakup/divorce.

I think that was the point?

Which still doesn't make sense since she left a whole 6 years after their break up and still does work sith different charities.

What work does she do with different charities? Interested to learn.

Same as every other celeb or person? I know you're just trying to pick a fight and i am not interested. Brad and Angelina are two separate people. They're not forever connected in their decisions. Both sides of stans on here really need to learn that.

Okay, so none. Got it. Her finances got tight after the split, and she no longer had the Jolie-Pitt Foundation to fund her her charitable endeavors. Because of her shenanigans about the chateau and custody, Pitt wouldn't hand over the generous financial settlement she expected. She does fine on her own, but leads a very expensive lifestyle, enjoying her mansion and private jet just like the rest of them. Charities were a nice hobby and PR plus when the joint pockets were much deeper. So don't try to assert she's remotely less shallow than the rest.

What are you talking about. The Jolie-Pitt Foundation still runs..... They both were doing charity work before they met each other as after because guess what? They are not dependent on each until the ends of time.

No evidence it's active, which would be tricky post-split. It's a joint marital asset that will factor into the divorce settlement. I think she does what she can through the Maddox Jolie-Pitt Foundation, but I also think it's true she's a lot less active than she used to be and mostly looks for sponsored activities. Like the Guerlain/bees one.

You can look up it's tax papers...It's active. Brad still contributes.

Tax returns here. In 2022 only $18k in contributions, a little over a million given out. Down to just 4.5m net worth. Seems like it's gradually drawing down and will be defunct soon, which is to be expected in the event of a split.

https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/205176706

$0 contributions received in 2020 and 2021. Yeah, it's done.

Obviously not as they had contributions in 2022 and Angelina/Brad are still contributing.

Where is the evidence they're still contributing? The measly $18K 2022 contribution, don't think so.

They gave away over 500k in grants/contributions. It's none of your business if they both still decided to contribute their own money.

They're spending down the foundation's assets over a period of years, went from a high of more than $40m when they were together down to just $4.5m total assets now. No new contributions in recent years, as the tax returns make clear.

In 2015 and 2016 their total assets was barely 3 million too. None of you guys know what's happening lol

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is Angelina catching strays when this thread isn’t even about her?

AJ looked lovely and didn’t seem to mind going solo. She got a standing ovation, her kids love her, she looks great.

Ines looks great too. A different kind of great, but great nonetheless.

Ines jumped right into a relationship with BP while divorcing so maybe they’re both just having fun? Maybe it will turn serious? Don’t think AJ cares either way…

Endless misogyny. It's so disheartening to see constant posts always attacking women in the worst way while men and their horrible behavior is ignored. Brad was violent with his wife and children and everyone gives him a pass.

We are marching back in time wrt women's rights in this country.

+1

Does Angelina get a pass for her violence?

DP. Neither gets a pass. They are both raging addicts with major issues.

It’s always funny to me when people pick sides with a crazy celebrity couple. It’s clear they are both troubled, addicted, shallow people. It’s not like a healthy Brad Pitt married crazy and had a bunch of kids with this person if he wasn’t bonkers himself.

And same for Angie. When she met Brad he was married and we now know he was a heavy daily pot smoker and drinker - he’s admitted that.

They clearly both ignored red flags.

Blinds have been saying for years the relationship had soured by 2009 but Angie insisted they stay together because of appearances and she didn’t want Aniston to be able to say told you so. So they had an open drug fueled relationship.

It’s a mess all around.

Angelina is not shallow. She is a humanitarian and an amazing mom to 6 kids who all adore her. Brad and Jen Aniston on the other hand ha e always been obsessed with their good looks and self importance. No wonder they’ll have no family to keep them company in old age.

Maybe the kids adore her in a stockholm syndrome sort of way.

And not obsessed with her looks? Lmao. She's singlehandedly kept plastic surgeons and derms in business.

+1 Not shallow? Sure, Jan. And she left her so-called humanitarian calling once Brad P was no longer bankrolling her.

That make little sense since she left the UN years after the breakup/divorce.

I think that was the point?

Which still doesn't make sense since she left a whole 6 years after their break up and still does work sith different charities.

What work does she do with different charities? Interested to learn.

Same as every other celeb or person? I know you're just trying to pick a fight and i am not interested. Brad and Angelina are two separate people. They're not forever connected in their decisions. Both sides of stans on here really need to learn that.

Okay, so none. Got it. Her finances got tight after the split, and she no longer had the Jolie-Pitt Foundation to fund her her charitable endeavors. Because of her shenanigans about the chateau and custody, Pitt wouldn't hand over the generous financial settlement she expected. She does fine on her own, but leads a very expensive lifestyle, enjoying her mansion and private jet just like the rest of them. Charities were a nice hobby and PR plus when the joint pockets were much deeper. So don't try to assert she's remotely less shallow than the rest.

What are you talking about. The Jolie-Pitt Foundation still runs..... They both were doing charity work before they met each other as after because guess what? They are not dependent on each until the ends of time.

No evidence it's active, which would be tricky post-split. It's a joint marital asset that will factor into the divorce settlement. I think she does what she can through the Maddox Jolie-Pitt Foundation, but I also think it's true she's a lot less active than she used to be and mostly looks for sponsored activities. Like the Guerlain/bees one.

You can look up it's tax papers...It's active. Brad still contributes.

Tax returns here. In 2022 only $18k in contributions, a little over a million given out. Down to just 4.5m net worth. Seems like it's gradually drawing down and will be defunct soon, which is to be expected in the event of a split.

https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/205176706

$0 contributions received in 2020 and 2021. Yeah, it's done.

Obviously not as they had contributions in 2022 and Angelina/Brad are still contributing.

There's no need for them to close it if they dont want too. It's a small foundation that helps supplement their other ones and donates to other charities. It's no one's business if Brad still wants to contributes. I don't see him paying for MIR, so let him do a good deed here.

I think she will probably like a foundation with just her name or the kids initials

The MJP Foundation has always been close to her heart, and she recently said she envisions spending more time in Cambodia. I wonder if that's why Maddox hasn't legally dropped "Pitt" too, because it might not make sense to change the name of a charitable foundation that's been active for 20 years.

Yeah that makes sense. It would be off if the person the foundation named of is completely different. Neither of them need a foundation to donate to charities as well.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A wonderful mom who cheats with a married guy?

And? Many people in Hollywood cheat and are serial cheaters. They're still good parents. Sounds like you just have a vendetta for her.

Wow, disagree with this. Cheaters are not good parents. Sounds like you are one.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is Angelina catching strays when this thread isn’t even about her?

AJ looked lovely and didn’t seem to mind going solo. She got a standing ovation, her kids love her, she looks great.

Ines looks great too. A different kind of great, but great nonetheless.

Ines jumped right into a relationship with BP while divorcing so maybe they’re both just having fun? Maybe it will turn serious? Don’t think AJ cares either way…

Endless misogyny. It's so disheartening to see constant posts always attacking women in the worst way while men and their horrible behavior is ignored. Brad was violent with his wife and children and everyone gives him a pass.

We are marching back in time wrt women's rights in this country.

+1

Does Angelina get a pass for her violence?

DP. Neither gets a pass. They are both raging addicts with major issues.

It’s always funny to me when people pick sides with a crazy celebrity couple. It’s clear they are both troubled, addicted, shallow people. It’s not like a healthy Brad Pitt married crazy and had a bunch of kids with this person if he wasn’t bonkers himself.

And same for Angie. When she met Brad he was married and we now know he was a heavy daily pot smoker and drinker - he’s admitted that.

They clearly both ignored red flags.

Blinds have been saying for years the relationship had soured by 2009 but Angie insisted they stay together because of appearances and she didn’t want Aniston to be able to say told you so. So they had an open drug fueled relationship.

It’s a mess all around.

Angelina is not shallow. She is a humanitarian and an amazing mom to 6 kids who all adore her. Brad and Jen Aniston on the other hand ha e always been obsessed with their good looks and self importance. No wonder they’ll have no family to keep them company in old age.

Maybe the kids adore her in a stockholm syndrome sort of way.

And not obsessed with her looks? Lmao. She's singlehandedly kept plastic surgeons and derms in business.

+1 Not shallow? Sure, Jan. And she left her so-called humanitarian calling once Brad P was no longer bankrolling her.

That make little sense since she left the UN years after the breakup/divorce.

I think that was the point?

Which still doesn't make sense since she left a whole 6 years after their break up and still does work sith different charities.

What work does she do with different charities? Interested to learn.

Same as every other celeb or person? I know you're just trying to pick a fight and i am not interested. Brad and Angelina are two separate people. They're not forever connected in their decisions. Both sides of stans on here really need to learn that.

Okay, so none. Got it. Her finances got tight after the split, and she no longer had the Jolie-Pitt Foundation to fund her her charitable endeavors. Because of her shenanigans about the chateau and custody, Pitt wouldn't hand over the generous financial settlement she expected. She does fine on her own, but leads a very expensive lifestyle, enjoying her mansion and private jet just like the rest of them. Charities were a nice hobby and PR plus when the joint pockets were much deeper. So don't try to assert she's remotely less shallow than the rest.

What are you talking about. The Jolie-Pitt Foundation still runs..... They both were doing charity work before they met each other as after because guess what? They are not dependent on each until the ends of time.

No evidence it's active, which would be tricky post-split. It's a joint marital asset that will factor into the divorce settlement. I think she does what she can through the Maddox Jolie-Pitt Foundation, but I also think it's true she's a lot less active than she used to be and mostly looks for sponsored activities. Like the Guerlain/bees one.

You can look up it's tax papers...It's active. Brad still contributes.

Tax returns here. In 2022 only $18k in contributions, a little over a million given out. Down to just 4.5m net worth. Seems like it's gradually drawing down and will be defunct soon, which is to be expected in the event of a split.

https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/205176706

$0 contributions received in 2020 and 2021. Yeah, it's done.

Obviously not as they had contributions in 2022 and Angelina/Brad are still contributing.

There's no need for them to close it if they dont want too. It's a small foundation that helps supplement their other ones and donates to other charities. It's no one's business if Brad still wants to contributes. I don't see him paying for MIR, so let him do a good deed here.

I think she will probably like a foundation with just her name or the kids initials

The MJP Foundation has always been close to her heart, and she recently said she envisions spending more time in Cambodia. I wonder if that's why Maddox hasn't legally dropped "Pitt" too, because it might not make sense to change the name of a charitable foundation that's been active for 20 years.

Yeah that makes sense. It would be off if the person the foundation named of is completely different. Neither of them need a foundation to donate to charities as well.

True. Brad is still mired in the Make It Right lawsuit (those poor folks with the bad houses), so is probably not doing much until that is settled one way or another.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Have to agree that the criticism here should be directed at Brad. He's clearly had some work done. From afar, he looks much younger. But up close, he looks like an old man trying too hard to look young.

From an educational standpoint, what causes this? Fillers? He looks so much younger than last year during wimbledon but also looks so much worst at the same time. He completely erased his jawline. I think his wimbledon ruggard look would have aged well. There was no need for the extra work. Maybe it's reversible.

I think he overdid it a little with the fillers, and also looked a little bloated. He looked very good at the press conference, in the light blue suit, and seemed fine there. Better lighting and better rested? He seemed out of sorts on the red carpet though, and didn't look nearly as good. Harsher lighting a factor, maybe.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A wonderful mom who cheats with a married guy?

And? Many people in Hollywood cheat and are serial cheaters. They're still good parents. Sounds like you just have a vendetta for her.

Wow, disagree with this. Cheaters are not good parents. Sounds like you are one.

She cheated with another woman’s husband. She thought she was getting a prize by stealing him away from his wife, but she only inherited another woman’s problem. She had her young adopted son calling the man she was having an affair with “dad” and jumped right into having a family with a man who she couldn’t agree on basic parenting skills with. Since the split, she’s tried to keep the situation as acrimonious as possible, divulge sordid details to the public and encourage her children not to have a relationship with the father she wanted for her kids. She is not a good mother and her actions demonstrate it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A wonderful mom who cheats with a married guy?

And? Many people in Hollywood cheat and are serial cheaters. They're still good parents. Sounds like you just have a vendetta for her.

Wow, disagree with this. Cheaters are not good parents. Sounds like you are one.

+1 I'll never think of her as a good person or a good parent. Don't care what self-serving celebrity humanitarianism she does for PR.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A wonderful mom who cheats with a married guy?

And? Many people in Hollywood cheat and are serial cheaters. They're still good parents. Sounds like you just have a vendetta for her.

Wow, disagree with this. Cheaters are not good parents. Sounds like you are one.

Sounds like you have been cheated on and are carrying a grudge against her. As I said people in are serial cheater. Whole different playground.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A wonderful mom who cheats with a married guy?

And? Many people in Hollywood cheat and are serial cheaters. They're still good parents. Sounds like you just have a vendetta for her.

Wow, disagree with this. Cheaters are not good parents. Sounds like you are one.

She cheated with another woman’s husband. She thought she was getting a prize by stealing him away from his wife, but she only inherited another woman’s problem. She had her young adopted son calling the man she was having an affair with “dad” and jumped right into having a family with a man who she couldn’t agree on basic parenting skills with. Since the split, she’s tried to keep the situation as acrimonious as possible, divulge sordid details to the public and encourage her children not to have a relationship with the father she wanted for her kids. She is not a good mother and her actions demonstrate it.

He's not an object and has autonomy lol. That grown man was not stolen. He willingly went back on that movie when she joined, willingly wanted an affair and willingly left his wife.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Have to agree that the criticism here should be directed at Brad. He's clearly had some work done. From afar, he looks much younger. But up close, he looks like an old man trying too hard to look young.

From an educational standpoint, what causes this? Fillers? He looks so much younger then last year during wimbledon but also looks so much worst at the same time. He completely erased his jawline. I think his wimbledon ruggard look would have aged well. There was no need for the extra work. Maybe it's reversible.

It's obviously fillers but I think something wonky happened with his facelift from last year. He's gained weight or looks bloated all over too. Health issues maybe? All of that doesn't mix well.

DP. The bloating to me suggests he is drinking again.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Have to agree that the criticism here should be directed at Brad. He's clearly had some work done. From afar, he looks much younger. But up close, he looks like an old man trying too hard to look young.

From an educational standpoint, what causes this? Fillers? He looks so much younger then last year during wimbledon but also looks so much worst at the same time. He completely erased his jawline. I think his wimbledon ruggard look would have aged well. There was no need for the extra work. Maybe it's reversible.

It's obviously fillers but I think something wonky happened with his facelift from last year. He's gained weight or looks bloated all over too. Health issues maybe? All of that doesn't mix well.

DP. The bloating to me suggests he is drinking again.

I was counting that under health issues. I didn't want to be the first one to say it haha. The bloating paired with the pink/red face screams heavy drinking. Would hate for any of it to be the cause so I hope things get better for him.

[Anonymous]

He was out in NYC with Ines. She looks great, basically dresses like JA did in the 90s.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-13828625/Brad-Pitt-60-Ines-Ramon-35-NYC-date-night.html

He looks…off.

Meanwhile Angelina took Pax to the TIFF red carpet. A little weird since he’s still recovering from his accident. Her “look at me, I’m such a good mom” schtick is stale. No, no you’re not.