[twitter]
So his base continues to love him, and he provides more evidence for the attack that he’s a total weirdo to everyone else. And that is supposed to be some brilliant plan? |
Congrats you finally got it, only took 10 years. |
It worked so well in 2020 he might as well try it again |
In 2016 (the only time Trump actually won anything), getting the media to constantly cover him and saying nasty things about Hillary worked beautifully. At that time Hillary was old news and he was new. He characterized her with things that are actually bad: her buttery emails scandal, calling her crooked and corrupt. But now we’ve watched this show for 10 seasons. He recycles so many attacks- calling Kamala mean, questioning her ethic origins. And trying to imply someone is lying about their ethnicity is very Elizabeth Warren/Pocahontas. It’s been done. We are all bored. The media may cover him until the end of time but it’s boring. |
You don’t sound bored, you sound jealous. |
Jealous of… who, exactly? |
Keep going. Not everyone is convinced you guys are total weirdos yet. |
It’s relevant because Kamala may have pressured Gavin Newsom to veto anti-caste legislation in California. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/11/22/indian-americans-caste-discrimination-newsom-veto/ It’s relevant because she is Indian and needs to address the exportation of caste to America. |
I don’t think you know what jealous means. |
I don’t really get the “weird” thing as an attack. Most people are weird, and “weird” is often used as an ableist dog whistle.[b] |
No, as you can see, he's obviously 100% Caucasian. /s ![]() |
No wonder she always forces herself to laugh weird. She was serious as a baby. People prob told her to lighten up. |
Still looks the same ![]() |
You know what I wanna add though, because this interview was a trainwreck for sure.
But would Kamala get in front of a crowd of Heritage foundation donors/moms for liberty supporters/etc… and do a Q&A? Because, honestly it’s not entirely that dissimilar of an analogy. Black people, generally vote.. what 80%+ Democrat?.. I think Black women at higher rates (and it was three Black women questioning him). And journalists have been one of the groups most at odds with him. What are the chances even 5% of these attendees voted for him ever? It was a bad interview, but I think the fact that he was willing to go for it says a lot. Can you imagine stumblin’ mumblin’ Joe doing a Q&A in that hostile of environment? Or Harris? No, because their overlords wouldn’t allow them because they know how awful it would be. Just another reminder about how the Democratic ticket is controlled by a political machine which is itself strictly controlled by donors. Whereas Trump is an individual who is beholden to no one except voters. |