IReady was the distinguisher here. |
Did you submit all of parents' optional forms? My AART once said even though they are optional, you're better to submit them |
That’s crazy. |
+1 and kids who hit, too. |
We did with extra work samples!
(quote=Anonymous]
Did you submit all of parents' optional forms? My AART once said even though they are optional, you're better to submit them |
Madison Pyramid
Cogat 149 NNAT 119 iReady math 99% iReady reading 97% No idea about HOPE In |
Cogat 133 (quantitative 138)
NNAT 122 High HOPE scale ratings High math iReady but ok reading iReady (68%), Childhood Apraxia of speech that made reading grades in 1st grade low until DS got over a learning to read hump Did not get it - appealing. |
I feel like parent referral and questionnaire give the committee a view of our kids at home. They also give me a chance to highlight my kids abilities through the provided samples. I did them for all 3 of my kids
|
DP and our AART said that too. And you emphasize HOPE and GBRS traits in every answer with very specific examples. |
Well you clearly have to appeal! That is ridiculous!! |
Take the Wisc |
What pyramid ? If in McLean scores are too low |
West Potomac pyramid. And he took the WISC about a month ago, which we’ll submit with the appeal. |
How competitive is Mclean? What percent get in? |
All of you are making the same mistake that comes up each year. You're trying to make sense of the process and assume there's any consistency or reason for a rejection. When my kid got rejected, the (very experienced) AART was baffled by the rejection. But, they said that every year in their school, 5 or so kids get rejected that they expected to get in, and another 5 kids got admitted with nothing to suggest that they belong in AAP.
The reality is that there are many different panels evaluating the kids, and on these panels, many different people who have different priorities and see things differently. One panel might be cranky and reject any kid who isn't absolutely perfect. One might be overly permissive and let anyone in who seems moderately capable. Some of the evaluators might downplay test scores and over-emphasize HOPE and work samples. Some might reject anyone that they guess was prepped, regardless of whether the kid actually was prepped. View it this way: If your child has the profile of an AAP kid, they have a 90% chance of being admitted. If they're borderline, they have a 50% chance of being admitted. If they don't have the profile of an AAP kid, there's still a 10% chance they'll be admitted. But it's all kind of luck. If your kid has the profile of an AAP kid, but doesn't get in, you absolutely should appeal with a letter and some additional work samples. The most important thing in the appeals, though, is that a different set of people will be evaluating your child's packet. |