Biden will run again

[Anonymous]

I can’t help but wonder if this is all for show, for Dems to show a united front and so he’s not a lame duck, but he secretly plans to drop out for “unforeseen” personal or health reason as it gets closer to the election. And hopefully Dems have someone in mind (not Harris) they can get behind. This could all be imaginary wishful thinking on my part.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who else would run for the Ds at this point?

Whitmer, Newsom, Buttigieg

Yes. Or…..

Jon Ossoff
Raphael Warnock
Lauren Underwood
Joe Nguse

There are others.

Dems have a deep bench. People who ask dumb questions like the first PPs don’t even bother to look at options. Lazy AF.

Ossoff and Warnock have been senators for five minutes. They are part of a deep bench? Nah.

Lol, unlike a young Senator Barack Obama who had also been senator for five minutes and then got zero momentum and did terribly when he ran for president.

Democrats have the most annoying habit of looking for reasons they aBsOluTeLy cAnNoT vote for this person or that person. Democrats are always looking for this magical, perfect person who appeals to absolutely everyone, never missteps, has the perfect amount of domestic and international experience, looks attractive enough, has a pristine dating history, has no annoying quirks, and is the correct race and gender.

If many democrat voters stop this buffoonery, they’ll see that we have lots of amazing candidates who aren’t even 80 years old. 😲😲

You must be young. The only thing that matters is that Biden can beat trump in the swing states. There is no point in a candidate that cannot do that

I’m 48. There are other people who can beat Trump; 80-year-old Joe isn’t the second coming.

You sound old and stuck in the past.

Trump lost to Biden. This is a do over. What fool would mess with success.

And Joe against someone who is not 70….? You think Joe’s going to look good against a fresh, quick-thinking candidate?

Who is that fresh, quick-thinking candidate you have in mind?

This guy, who's so charismatic and good on his feet - the one who just banned abortion in Florida?

Nope.

I’m thinking of Cheyney, Haley, or any of the other young republicans that are likely to run.

Haley is already running and is as already caught lying about how much money she has raised. She’s not winning the nomination.

You’re being pedantic. Biden’s loses to each of these people (see link)….except for Trump.

https://www.npr.org/2023/03/08/1160113954/2024-republican-presidential-candidates-who-is-running-tracker

Trump will murder him on the debate stage. Biden can't put complete sentences together. This ain't 2020.

I mean he never was bright (graduated 76th out of a class of 85 from Syracuse Law in 1968), but now the whole administration is a dumpster fire.

He beat trump and will beat him again.

[Anonymous]

If the DNC won’t allow debates I will vote for RFK Jr. What sort of election is this when debates are not part of the process?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If the DNC won’t allow debates I will vote for RFK Jr. What sort of election is this when debates are not part of the process?

That will show em.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If the DNC won’t allow debates I will vote for RFK Jr. What sort of election is this when debates are not part of the process?

The DNC is picking the candidate. No dissent. It's so democratic of them.

Just like Bernie and Hillary.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If the DNC won’t allow debates I will vote for RFK Jr. What sort of election is this when debates are not part of the process?

The DNC is picking the candidate. No dissent. It's so democratic of them.

Just like Bernie and Hillary.

Just because statistical tests like Benford's law show anomalies favoring establishment candidates in primaries, doesn't mean the primaries are a sham. Howard Dean (2004D), Ron Paul (2012R), and Bernie Sanders (2016D&2020D) were just very unlucky.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If the DNC won’t allow debates I will vote for RFK Jr. What sort of election is this when debates are not part of the process?

Kennedy is not a serious candidate, same as MW. They are running to elevate their profile. This country has real problems and you’re being pissy about a debate to take Biden away from solving REAL PROBLEMS. It’s astounding the privilege you must have to think your “demand” important. Grow up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I can’t help but wonder if this is all for show, for Dems to show a united front and so he’s not a lame duck, but he secretly plans to drop out for “unforeseen” personal or health reason as it gets closer to the election. And hopefully Dems have someone in mind (not Harris) they can get behind. This could all be imaginary wishful thinking on my part.

He’s so easy to control, they want him to win again.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If the DNC won’t allow debates I will vote for RFK Jr. What sort of election is this when debates are not part of the process?

Kennedy is not a serious candidate, same as MW. They are running to elevate their profile. This country has real problems and you’re being pissy about a debate to take Biden away from solving REAL PROBLEMS. It’s astounding the privilege you must have to think your “demand” important. Grow up.

So the DNC gets to cancel debates and determine who’s a serious candidate? And the RNC are the tyrants More like there’s no way they want Biden debating anyone. RFK would destroy them and their narratives, as would any other ‘non-serious’ candidate

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If the DNC won’t allow debates I will vote for RFK Jr. What sort of election is this when debates are not part of the process?

Kennedy is not a serious candidate, same as MW. They are running to elevate their profile. This country has real problems and you’re being pissy about a debate to take Biden away from solving REAL PROBLEMS. It’s astounding the privilege you must have to think your “demand” important. Grow up.

So the DNC gets to cancel debates and determine who’s a serious candidate? And the RNC are the tyrants More like there’s no way they want Biden debating anyone. RFK would destroy them and their narratives, as would any other ‘non-serious’ candidate

Incumbent Presidents don’t debate challengers. Always has been. Sorry that upsets you.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

The Goskomizdat

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If the DNC won’t allow debates I will vote for RFK Jr. What sort of election is this when debates are not part of the process?

Kennedy is not a serious candidate, same as MW. They are running to elevate their profile. This country has real problems and you’re being pissy about a debate to take Biden away from solving REAL PROBLEMS. It’s astounding the privilege you must have to think your “demand” important. Grow up.

So the DNC gets to cancel debates and determine who’s a serious candidate? And the RNC are the tyrants More like there’s no way they want Biden debating anyone. RFK would destroy them and their narratives, as would any other ‘non-serious’ candidate

Incumbent Presidents don’t debate challengers. Always has been. Sorry that upsets you.

Talking point - DRINK

[Anonymous]

Joe No Borders Biden has done all he can to expand legal AND illegal immigration.

A Vote for Joe is a vote to give US workers the middle finger.

And this shows how pro-migration the Biden administration is. A U.S. reader, one of the American high-tech types injured by the HXXB program, follows the Indian press and sent me a link to a recent news item in the Economic Times, which said: “The new US Consulate in Hyderabad is now the biggest Consulate in South Asia [it covers 12 acres] with 54 [visa] windows as against 16 in the Paigah Palace earlier. It will process 3,500 visa applications.”

That’s a huge increase, from 16 to 54. Although the last line of the quotation does not say so, let’s assume that the 3,500 visa applications is for a day. If that is the case, then each window would handle just under 65 applications a day, or eight an hour, or one every 7.5 minutes.

cant afford to help US low wage workers but can afford to increase visa processing for Indian HXXB entry level workers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

So what. Trump spend a majority of his time at his golf course in Fl.