Biden will run again

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm sure I said this previously in this 100 page thread, but I wish Biden would have announced that he wasn't going to run and would have let the nomination process play out for '24.

I'm still voting for him. There's no other choice as far as I'm concerned, but it sucks that no matter who wins we are all stuck with an old man who shouldn't be President.

+1. In 2020, I felt we needed to rally around Biden because of the pandemic and the danger of the lunatic egomaniac Donald Trump. But I assumed at the time that Biden would only serve one term, and we could then vote for our favorite Democrat during the 2024 primaries. I feel voiceless because Democrats have not been able to vote for their preferred Presidential candidate in either 2024 or 2020 (when primaries were shut down early).

I have a bit of deja vu with Ruth Bader Ginsburg choosing not to step down from the Supreme Court during the Obama Presidency and the subsequent terrible consequences.

[Anonymous]

"It’s the biggest television audience, not even close, and you get a chance to do a 20-, 25-minute interview on that day," Carville began.

"And you don’t do it? That’s a kind of sign that the staff or yourself doesn’t have much confidence in you," Carville continued. "There’s no other way to read this."

"And he's not going to do debates," Carville said. "He is old, I know what it is because I'm almost as old as he is, and it's never going to get better."

[Anonymous]

He and his staff are totally tone deaf.

Businesses have two choices.... provide a smaller product for the same price OR raise the price on the current sized products.
It's as if he has just learned the term, "shrinkflation."

And, does Joe even stop to think about WHY businesses are forced into this decision?

This will get mocked relentlessly.

[Anonymous]

In retrospect who could have talked/forced Biden into not running for re-election? It seems like a complete failure of the DNC leadership that they didn’t succeed (or try) to get him off the ticket. It’s a real “Weimar Republic” moment for the US.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm sure I said this previously in this 100 page thread, but I wish Biden would have announced that he wasn't going to run and would have let the nomination process play out for '24.

I'm still voting for him. There's no other choice as far as I'm concerned, but it sucks that no matter who wins we are all stuck with an old man who shouldn't be President.

+1. In 2020, I felt we needed to rally around Biden because of the pandemic and the danger of the lunatic egomaniac Donald Trump. But I assumed at the time that Biden would only serve one term, and we could then vote for our favorite Democrat during the 2024 primaries. I feel voiceless because Democrats have not been able to vote for their preferred Presidential candidate in either 2024 or 2020 (when primaries were shut down early).

I have a bit of deja vu with Ruth Bader Ginsburg choosing not to step down from the Supreme Court during the Obama Presidency and the subsequent terrible consequences.

In these times, you cannot just give up the power of incumbancy, particularly when an open primary would pit progressive, liberals and moderates in a fight for the party. Why expose right now with Trump looming when that can be determined in 4 years? as it is, there is no one on the Dem side who polls in such a ways as to be an obvious candidate who can beat Trump. So why take the risk?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:In retrospect who could have talked/forced Biden into not running for re-election? It seems like a complete failure of the DNC leadership that they didn’t succeed (or try) to get him off the ticket. It’s a real “Weimar Republic” moment for the US.

When was the last time an incumbent was talked into not running?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In retrospect who could have talked/forced Biden into not running for re-election? It seems like a complete failure of the DNC leadership that they didn’t succeed (or try) to get him off the ticket. It’s a real “Weimar Republic” moment for the US.

When was the last time an incumbent was talked into not running?

LBJ talked himself out of running when he saw the writing on the wall (although some suspect he was secretly hoping for a draft movement at the Chicago Convention). But why worry about what's happened in the past? This situation is unprecedented - an incumbent president from a party with a very good shot at winning in 2024, who is so personally unpopular and mentally compromised that he puts the election out of reach. That's exactly when the DNC should step in.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In retrospect who could have talked/forced Biden into not running for re-election? It seems like a complete failure of the DNC leadership that they didn’t succeed (or try) to get him off the ticket. It’s a real “Weimar Republic” moment for the US.

When was the last time an incumbent was talked into not running?

LBJ talked himself out of running when he saw the writing on the wall (although some suspect he was secretly hoping for a draft movement at the Chicago Convention). But why worry about what's happened in the past? This situation is unprecedented - an incumbent president from a party with a very good shot at winning in 2024, who is so personally unpopular and mentally compromised that he puts the election out of reach. That's exactly when the DNC should step in.

Yes, it is unprecedented. It has never happened.

And, look at all the DCUM threads about who should replace Biden. The answer is, no one else can beat Trump. No one else has the polling, backing or experience to do it. Yes, Biden is old. It is what it is. I would rather have old joe than old and corrupt Trump.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

"It’s the biggest television audience, not even close, and you get a chance to do a 20-, 25-minute interview on that day," Carville began.

"And you don’t do it? That’s a kind of sign that the staff or yourself doesn’t have much confidence in you," Carville continued. "There’s no other way to read this."

"And he's not going to do debates," Carville said. "He is old, I know what it is because I'm almost as old as he is, and it's never going to get better."

Another old fool who has stayed much too late at the party. Just go away. And take Pelosi, McConnell, Grassley, Trump, and Biden with you.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In retrospect who could have talked/forced Biden into not running for re-election? It seems like a complete failure of the DNC leadership that they didn’t succeed (or try) to get him off the ticket. It’s a real “Weimar Republic” moment for the US.

When was the last time an incumbent was talked into not running?

LBJ talked himself out of running when he saw the writing on the wall (although some suspect he was secretly hoping for a draft movement at the Chicago Convention). But why worry about what's happened in the past? This situation is unprecedented - an incumbent president from a party with a very good shot at winning in 2024, who is so personally unpopular and mentally compromised that he puts the election out of reach. That's exactly when the DNC should step in.

Yes, it is unprecedented. It has never happened.

And, look at all the DCUM threads about who should replace Biden. The answer is, no one else can beat Trump. No one else has the polling, backing or experience to do it. Yes, Biden is old. It is what it is. I would rather have old joe than old and corrupt Trump.

Completely disagree. At this point, Biden is scarier than Trump. Put in another sensible democrat and that calculation changes completely.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm sure I said this previously in this 100 page thread, but I wish Biden would have announced that he wasn't going to run and would have let the nomination process play out for '24.

I'm still voting for him. There's no other choice as far as I'm concerned, but it sucks that no matter who wins we are all stuck with an old man who shouldn't be President.

+1. In 2020, I felt we needed to rally around Biden because of the pandemic and the danger of the lunatic egomaniac Donald Trump. But I assumed at the time that Biden would only serve one term, and we could then vote for our favorite Democrat during the 2024 primaries. I feel voiceless because Democrats have not been able to vote for their preferred Presidential candidate in either 2024 or 2020 (when primaries were shut down early).

I have a bit of deja vu with Ruth Bader Ginsburg choosing not to step down from the Supreme Court during the Obama Presidency and the subsequent terrible consequences.

In these times, you cannot just give up the power of incumbancy, particularly when an open primary would pit progressive, liberals and moderates in a fight for the party. Why expose right now with Trump looming when that can be determined in 4 years? as it is, there is no one on the Dem side who polls in such a ways as to be an obvious candidate who can beat Trump. So why take the risk?

Are you kidding? People would vote for a Dem not senile who is a new candidate over this senile incumbent in a heartbeat. Are you living under a rock? He may be the incumbent but he's not all there - keeping a zero power candidate in incumbent or not is silly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In retrospect who could have talked/forced Biden into not running for re-election? It seems like a complete failure of the DNC leadership that they didn’t succeed (or try) to get him off the ticket. It’s a real “Weimar Republic” moment for the US.

When was the last time an incumbent was talked into not running?

LBJ talked himself out of running when he saw the writing on the wall (although some suspect he was secretly hoping for a draft movement at the Chicago Convention). But why worry about what's happened in the past? This situation is unprecedented - an incumbent president from a party with a very good shot at winning in 2024, who is so personally unpopular and mentally compromised that he puts the election out of reach. That's exactly when the DNC should step in.

The “writing on the wall” for LBJ was a poorer than expected showing in the New Hampshire primary, something Biden definitely did not experience.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Funny, the same poll shows Biden winning over Trump.

Yup.

Sigh.. you don't get it. That Joe is leading by this slim a margin is pretty hella depressing. And as the incumbent! You put a younger new Dem candidate who is legit and then you will see the difference. The argument that there's nobody else is damning. That's super pathetic you all feel an 81 yr old guy losing his mind who looks like he's 100 has the best chance of defeating a quack like Trump! This is the prob with Dems. No imagination. Leading by this little is nothing but sad. It's like saying my kid is not failing and getting a C or D. Why wouldn't you go for the A???

[Anonymous]

LOL.