Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:First, let me say I’m not a government worker, but a lifelong DC area resident. I am curious about how people view DC employment. Many came here for the jobs. Now they want to take the jobs. How does DC not become Detroit?
Because Executive branch/Congress/Judiciary ain't moving. When they do, detroit 2.0
So, DC can become Detroit?
DC actually had a net increase of population in 2022. It’s going to be fine. Economies change.
Y’all kinda sound like politicians. Say it’s gonna be fine but the exodus hadn’t happened yet! You don’t know what’s gonna happen. JC.
Sounds like you understand communities better than the Fed’s policy staff!
Please tell us all about the “communities” again? That was not in my job description. I think the Republicans in Congress would be interested to know that the mission of the Federal government is to strengthen the economy of DC and waste money on real estate.
Oh, so now you’re a Republican? You really are self serving.
Surprise! Working in a capitalist system is by definition “self serving.”
You’re a freakin’ regulator. You’re supposed to be looking out for the little guy. Guess not.
I would love to reduce costs to the taxpayer and increase the quality and effectiveness of the federal workforce … through telework!
While decimating DC? Some options aren’t good ones.
Is DC decimated? I don’t think so. And again, as far as working conditions go, the theoretical management goal of “help DC” (which I doubt is genuine anyway) is something management wants. If they want that, then they need to pay for it in the form of increasing compensation.