Men have had problems for a while now- look at the dwindling college admission rates over the years as well as employment data. I suspect it's an indirect consequence of the cultural promotion of feminism as well as a rise in fatherless households. |
Oh, you can stop using that anymore. Cell phones and body cams have been bringing those excuses into bright light. https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/758913.page List of things you can’t do while black |
If masculinity is so fragile it can't tolerate "the cultural promotion of femininity," then can you really call it masculinity? |
And if cops cannot police themselves, then they have to be policed by third parties. (So to speak.) Take away qualified immunity. Not turning on body cam means you lose your job and pension. If we don't have enough candidates with this kind of oversight, then shift tasks (spend funding on medical/social work crisis response teams and not military weapons for the police department; separate traffic enforcement from regular police force, etc). Offer different incentives. I don't care how many nie guys you know as cops. This isn't working. American police cannot be trusted to police themselves. Other developed countries don't have this problem. Whatever they are doing needs to be started here, because we are failing. We are killing our own citizens. |
| ^^nice guys |
exactly |
That's really not true. The police chief immediately fired all five of these guys and the state brought charges against them. The system is working as it should. Other developed countries don't have this problem because they have a much higher police-to-citizen ratio and they don't have the most heavily armed civilian population in the world. Take away cops (which is de facto happening now as police forces shrink) and you replace it with vigilante justice. Because America's underlying violence problem isn't just police. It's all of us. |
+1 |
Nope. Not good enough. If we need more police, then we need to pay for it -- while we take away qualified immunity and all the toys. There's a thread on Reddit police where -- when a new taser came out that automatically turns on bodycam -- the cops were saying that they hated it, and that their departments were switching bodycams to a different brand so they wouldn't turn on with it. Yeah. Charges were brought this time. There was the sky cam footage. But you heard them talking to get their stories straight, right? The "he was swerving" and "he came at me" and "he got his hand on my gun." right? You saw the couple of cops who shined their lights at the sky cam when they came on the scene, and only then they propped him up against the vehicle and started to look like rendering aid? You saw the firefighters pull up and instead of assessing their patient and immobilizing his airway and treating massive blunt force head trauma, just stand around shooting the sh!t with the cops, right? You can see how casual and everyday this is all treated by the people involved? What the hell do you think happens when there isn't a sky cam? Do you really think the police chief jumps right on that and fires everybody? They knew there was video. So I guess we need to be like England, which is fully covered by outdoor surveillance in the cities. You cool with that? Because obviously the cops are inept at policing themselves without it. |
|
This is video of Tyre Nichols skateboarding, as released by his family: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i_hZGVI2U-4 None of the traffic cameras showed him swerving or driving aggressively. He was coming back home to his mom's house after taking pictures of the sunset. He liked Starbucks. Two cops held his arms back while their colleagues were punching him in the face, yelling "show me your hands! show me your hands!" and "stop resisting!" ... captured for the audio, but only before someone noticed the overhead camera. |
I don't want this to get lost. He was some 80 yards from his mother's house, crying out for her. There is no evidence for any reason to pull him over. |
This! Taking away qualified immunity is not something that will help. At all. Qualified immunity does NOT protect LE when they break the law.... like they did here. These 5 officers not only brought shame to themselves - they have also put another black eye on LE everywhere. The actions these officers took are not representative of 95%+ of officers we have. LE have thousands of encounters with the public every day that end as routine encounters. Please don't allow yourself to believe that this horrific incident is representative of most LE. |
Why is it that the systems you praise only "works" if there is some kind of video of it? Are all cops stupid enough to only commit acts like this in the vicinity of a pole camera that captures it on video? That would be pretty dumb. They certainly aren't turning in each other when there isn't video, though. Maybe it's the cameras that work, not the self-policing. |
|
I don't think it is representative of all LE at all. However it is sadly representative of far too many - some who had issues going into LE and some for whom working LE created the issues.
I know some men who are amazing police officers - most of them have tried to get off the street beat and away from the 'thugs' on their teams. All of them know who on their teams have reputations for anger issues, using excessive force, treating people like scum but they don't have the authority to act and their complaints are often seen as anti team / anti-LE or as going soft. They get told that not backing the team leads to officers being hurt or killed. They have so many unhealthy messages drummed into them during training. So instread they try and create distance and join special teams or get into other aspects of LE where they dont have to work shoulder to shoulder with the bad apples. |
Why is it that you won't acknowledge the thousands of police encounters that end routinely? Why can you not admit that the majority of the thousands of police officers that protect the public every day would never resort to this? |