Another Black Eye for Penn

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Penn is just wrong. There is no way around that First Gen means her even by its definition. Colleges suck at any legal or disciple issues. If you have a child involved at all, lawyer up with lawyers they can't screw with. If you don't have the money to do that you will be screwed.

No. Go back and read. The first fraudulent move was Questbridge which supported her application as a a first-gen. That was her first act of fraud.

What fraud? Did you read both Questbridge’s and Penn’s definition of first gen?

Can you not read? The lies in the application ! Like the sister!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Penn is just wrong. There is no way around that First Gen means her even by its definition. Colleges suck at any legal or disciple issues. If you have a child involved at all, lawyer up with lawyers they can't screw with. If you don't have the money to do that you will be screwed.

No. Go back and read. The first fraudulent move was Questbridge which supported her application as a a first-gen. That was her first act of fraud.

What fraud? Did you read both Questbridge’s and Penn’s definition of first gen?

Can you not read? The lies in the application ! Like the sister!

Good lord. Learn to read before responding. The comment was “The first fraudulent move was Questbridge which supported her application as a a first-gen. That was her first act of fraud.” The claim is about her being a fraud based on first gem. That has nothing to do with the sister.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Penn is just wrong. There is no way around that First Gen means her even by its definition. Colleges suck at any legal or disciple issues. If you have a child involved at all, lawyer up with lawyers they can't screw with. If you don't have the money to do that you will be screwed.

No. Go back and read. The first fraudulent move was Questbridge which supported her application as a a first-gen. That was her first act of fraud.

What fraud? Did you read both Questbridge’s and Penn’s definition of first gen?

Can you not read? The lies in the application ! Like the sister!

Good lord. Learn to read before responding. The comment was “The first fraudulent move was Questbridge which supported her application as a a first-gen. That was her first act of fraud.” The claim is about her being a fraud based on first gem. That has nothing to do with the sister.

The fact she lied I. The Questbridge application about the sister -and numerous other factors -is the beginning of many acts of fraud.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Penn is just wrong. There is no way around that First Gen means her even by its definition. Colleges suck at any legal or disciple issues. If you have a child involved at all, lawyer up with lawyers they can't screw with. If you don't have the money to do that you will be screwed.

No. Go back and read. The first fraudulent move was Questbridge which supported her application as a a first-gen. That was her first act of fraud.

What fraud? Did you read both Questbridge’s and Penn’s definition of first gen?

Can you not read? The lies in the application ! Like the sister!

Good lord. Learn to read before responding. The comment was “The first fraudulent move was Questbridge which supported her application as a a first-gen. That was her first act of fraud.” The claim is about her being a fraud based on first gem. That has nothing to do with the sister.

The fact she lied I. The Questbridge application about the sister -and numerous other factors -is the beginning of many acts of fraud.

Where are the statements from her father and sister saying she doesn’t provide financial support for the sister?

[Anonymous]

She doesn’t have a family. No fraud.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She doesn’t have a family. No fraud.
[/quot

Then why did she say she was supporting her sister?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Penn is just wrong. There is no way around that First Gen means her even by its definition. Colleges suck at any legal or disciple issues. If you have a child involved at all, lawyer up with lawyers they can't screw with. If you don't have the money to do that you will be screwed.

No. Go back and read. The first fraudulent move was Questbridge which supported her application as a a first-gen. That was her first act of fraud.

What fraud? Did you read both Questbridge’s and Penn’s definition of first gen?

Can you not read? The lies in the application ! Like the sister!

Good lord. Learn to read before responding. The comment was “The first fraudulent move was Questbridge which supported her application as a a first-gen. That was her first act of fraud.” The claim is about her being a fraud based on first gem. That has nothing to do with the sister.

The fact she lied I. The Questbridge application about the sister -and numerous other factors -is the beginning of many acts of fraud.

Where are the statements from her father and sister saying she doesn’t provide financial support for the sister?

I’m the pleadings. She lied about supporting a sister.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Penn is just wrong. There is no way around that First Gen means her even by its definition. Colleges suck at any legal or disciple issues. If you have a child involved at all, lawyer up with lawyers they can't screw with. If you don't have the money to do that you will be screwed.

No. Go back and read. The first fraudulent move was Questbridge which supported her application as a a first-gen. That was her first act of fraud.

What fraud? Did you read both Questbridge’s and Penn’s definition of first gen?

Can you not read? The lies in the application ! Like the sister!

Good lord. Learn to read before responding. The comment was “The first fraudulent move was Questbridge which supported her application as a a first-gen. That was her first act of fraud.” The claim is about her being a fraud based on first gem. That has nothing to do with the sister.

The fact she lied I. The Questbridge application about the sister -and numerous other factors -is the beginning of many acts of fraud.

Where are the statements from her father and sister saying she doesn’t provide financial support for the sister?

I’m the pleadings. She lied about supporting a sister.

Her father and sister confirmed she does not any provide financial support?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Penn is just wrong. There is no way around that First Gen means her even by its definition. Colleges suck at any legal or disciple issues. If you have a child involved at all, lawyer up with lawyers they can't screw with. If you don't have the money to do that you will be screwed.

No. Go back and read. The first fraudulent move was Questbridge which supported her application as a a first-gen. That was her first act of fraud.

Exactly. And even before that, note in the New Yorker piece she claims a college counselor at $30k yr Whitfield School randomly first told her she technically qualified for Questbridge. And she just randomly stumbled into the FGLI group her first semester at Penn. And she just randomly met a Rhodes Scholar who randomly encouraged her to apply. And she just carelessly retweeted articles she claims were full of falsehoods. Every ruthless choreographed move she made she tries to pass off like someone casually and randomly told her or it was just purely serendipitous she stumbled upon something or just an accident. Sort of like Stanford Duck Syndrome. She's trying really hard to look carefree, as if she's not trying really hard and playing every angle and exploiting people. It's so obvious and happens over and over and over. Seems like a tactic to try and deflect from the fact she's a calculated schemer.

You're making the case for how smart she is, that as an abused high school student she had the wherewithal and intelligence to discover the way to get into school through the organization Questbridge, which most high school students don't even know about.

Also I doubt she's had a carefree moment in her life. When you're an abused kid that's just not possible.

To get into a school she was not qualified for* as a dime a dozen A and B student with a mediocre SAT/ACT score and to loot over 300 thousand dollars in aid.

The playbook for Questbridge and other admissions hooks has been detailed various books, on reddit sub-forums, and notably ad nauseam on College Confidential forums for 22 years. College Confidential literally has a Questbridge sub-forum: https://talk.collegeconfidential.com/c/financial-aid-scholarships/questbridge-programs/47

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Penn is just wrong. There is no way around that First Gen means her even by its definition. Colleges suck at any legal or disciple issues. If you have a child involved at all, lawyer up with lawyers they can't screw with. If you don't have the money to do that you will be screwed.

No. Go back and read. The first fraudulent move was Questbridge which supported her application as a a first-gen. That was her first act of fraud.

What fraud? Did you read both Questbridge’s and Penn’s definition of first gen?

Can you not read? The lies in the application ! Like the sister!

Good lord. Learn to read before responding. The comment was “The first fraudulent move was Questbridge which supported her application as a a first-gen. That was her first act of fraud.” The claim is about her being a fraud based on first gem. That has nothing to do with the sister.

The fact she lied I. The Questbridge application about the sister -and numerous other factors -is the beginning of many acts of fraud.

Where are the statements from her father and sister saying she doesn’t provide financial support for the sister?

I’m the pleadings. She lied about supporting a sister.

Her father and sister confirmed she does not any provide financial support?

Hopefully Penn can put dad under oath so we can discover how many days and nights and the tally of expenses McKenzie has covered for her half-sister. lol

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Penn is just wrong. There is no way around that First Gen means her even by its definition. Colleges suck at any legal or disciple issues. If you have a child involved at all, lawyer up with lawyers they can't screw with. If you don't have the money to do that you will be screwed.

No. Go back and read. The first fraudulent move was Questbridge which supported her application as a a first-gen. That was her first act of fraud.

Exactly. And even before that, note in the New Yorker piece she claims a college counselor at $30k yr Whitfield School randomly first told her she technically qualified for Questbridge. And she just randomly stumbled into the FGLI group her first semester at Penn. And she just randomly met a Rhodes Scholar who randomly encouraged her to apply. And she just carelessly retweeted articles she claims were full of falsehoods. Every ruthless choreographed move she made she tries to pass off like someone casually and randomly told her or it was just purely serendipitous she stumbled upon something or just an accident. Sort of like Stanford Duck Syndrome. She's trying really hard to look carefree, as if she's not trying really hard and playing every angle and exploiting people. It's so obvious and happens over and over and over. Seems like a tactic to try and deflect from the fact she's a calculated schemer.

You're making the case for how smart she is, that as an abused high school student she had the wherewithal and intelligence to discover the way to get into school through the organization Questbridge, which most high school students don't even know about.

Also I doubt she's had a carefree moment in her life. When you're an abused kid that's just not possible.

Exactly. Who are these idiots ascribing "criminal mastermind" level talents to this young woman? She was an abused child who tried for years to cover it up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Penn is just wrong. There is no way around that First Gen means her even by its definition. Colleges suck at any legal or disciple issues. If you have a child involved at all, lawyer up with lawyers they can't screw with. If you don't have the money to do that you will be screwed.

No. Go back and read. The first fraudulent move was Questbridge which supported her application as a a first-gen. That was her first act of fraud.

What fraud? Did you read both Questbridge’s and Penn’s definition of first gen?

Can you not read? The lies in the application ! Like the sister!

Good lord. Learn to read before responding. The comment was “The first fraudulent move was Questbridge which supported her application as a a first-gen. That was her first act of fraud.” The claim is about her being a fraud based on first gem. That has nothing to do with the sister.

The fact she lied I. The Questbridge application about the sister -and numerous other factors -is the beginning of many acts of fraud.

Where are the statements from her father and sister saying she doesn’t provide financial support for the sister?

I’m the pleadings. She lied about supporting a sister.

Her father and sister confirmed she does not any provide financial support?

Hopefully Penn can put dad under oath so we can discover how many days and nights and the tally of expenses McKenzie has covered for her half-sister. lol

Well someone, maybe you? keeps claiming she lied about the sister but refuses to post the statements from the father and sister. Yet they repeatedly post what Mackenzie wrote in her applications. If she lied, why not post the entire story all at once? After all, it’s in the proceedings, right? There would be no further questions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Penn is just wrong. There is no way around that First Gen means her even by its definition. Colleges suck at any legal or disciple issues. If you have a child involved at all, lawyer up with lawyers they can't screw with. If you don't have the money to do that you will be screwed.

No. Go back and read. The first fraudulent move was Questbridge which supported her application as a a first-gen. That was her first act of fraud.

Exactly. And even before that, note in the New Yorker piece she claims a college counselor at $30k yr Whitfield School randomly first told her she technically qualified for Questbridge. And she just randomly stumbled into the FGLI group her first semester at Penn. And she just randomly met a Rhodes Scholar who randomly encouraged her to apply. And she just carelessly retweeted articles she claims were full of falsehoods. Every ruthless choreographed move she made she tries to pass off like someone casually and randomly told her or it was just purely serendipitous she stumbled upon something or just an accident. Sort of like Stanford Duck Syndrome. She's trying really hard to look carefree, as if she's not trying really hard and playing every angle and exploiting people. It's so obvious and happens over and over and over. Seems like a tactic to try and deflect from the fact she's a calculated schemer.

You're making the case for how smart she is, that as an abused high school student she had the wherewithal and intelligence to discover the way to get into school through the organization Questbridge, which most high school students don't even know about.

Also I doubt she's had a carefree moment in her life. When you're an abused kid that's just not possible.

To get into a school she was not qualified for* as a dime a dozen A and B student with a mediocre SAT/ACT score and to loot over 300 thousand dollars in aid.

The playbook for Questbridge and other admissions hooks has been detailed various books, on reddit sub-forums, and notably ad nauseam on College Confidential forums for 22 years. College Confidential literally has a Questbridge sub-forum: https://talk.collegeconfidential.com/c/financial-aid-scholarships/questbridge-programs/47

I would bet she obsessively read College Confidential forums and since kids detail all of their hooks, the two hooks she seized on were foster and Questbridge.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Penn is just wrong. There is no way around that First Gen means her even by its definition. Colleges suck at any legal or disciple issues. If you have a child involved at all, lawyer up with lawyers they can't screw with. If you don't have the money to do that you will be screwed.

No. Go back and read. The first fraudulent move was Questbridge which supported her application as a a first-gen. That was her first act of fraud.

Exactly. And even before that, note in the New Yorker piece she claims a college counselor at $30k yr Whitfield School randomly first told her she technically qualified for Questbridge. And she just randomly stumbled into the FGLI group her first semester at Penn. And she just randomly met a Rhodes Scholar who randomly encouraged her to apply. And she just carelessly retweeted articles she claims were full of falsehoods. Every ruthless choreographed move she made she tries to pass off like someone casually and randomly told her or it was just purely serendipitous she stumbled upon something or just an accident. Sort of like Stanford Duck Syndrome. She's trying really hard to look carefree, as if she's not trying really hard and playing every angle and exploiting people. It's so obvious and happens over and over and over. Seems like a tactic to try and deflect from the fact she's a calculated schemer.

You're making the case for how smart she is, that as an abused high school student she had the wherewithal and intelligence to discover the way to get into school through the organization Questbridge, which most high school students don't even know about.

Also I doubt she's had a carefree moment in her life. When you're an abused kid that's just not possible.

To get into a school she was not qualified for* as a dime a dozen A and B student with a mediocre SAT/ACT score and to loot over 300 thousand dollars in aid.

The playbook for Questbridge and other admissions hooks has been detailed various books, on reddit sub-forums, and notably ad nauseam on College Confidential forums for 22 years. College Confidential literally has a Questbridge sub-forum: https://talk.collegeconfidential.com/c/financial-aid-scholarships/questbridge-programs/47

I would bet she obsessively read College Confidential forums and since kids detail all of their hooks, the two hooks she seized on were foster and Questbridge.

WHO ARE YOU? Do you spin all sort of fiction routinely?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Penn is just wrong. There is no way around that First Gen means her even by its definition. Colleges suck at any legal or disciple issues. If you have a child involved at all, lawyer up with lawyers they can't screw with. If you don't have the money to do that you will be screwed.

No. Go back and read. The first fraudulent move was Questbridge which supported her application as a a first-gen. That was her first act of fraud.

Exactly. And even before that, note in the New Yorker piece she claims a college counselor at $30k yr Whitfield School randomly first told her she technically qualified for Questbridge. And she just randomly stumbled into the FGLI group her first semester at Penn. And she just randomly met a Rhodes Scholar who randomly encouraged her to apply. And she just carelessly retweeted articles she claims were full of falsehoods. Every ruthless choreographed move she made she tries to pass off like someone casually and randomly told her or it was just purely serendipitous she stumbled upon something or just an accident. Sort of like Stanford Duck Syndrome. She's trying really hard to look carefree, as if she's not trying really hard and playing every angle and exploiting people. It's so obvious and happens over and over and over. Seems like a tactic to try and deflect from the fact she's a calculated schemer.

You're making the case for how smart she is, that as an abused high school student she had the wherewithal and intelligence to discover the way to get into school through the organization Questbridge, which most high school students don't even know about.

Also I doubt she's had a carefree moment in her life. When you're an abused kid that's just not possible.

Exactly. Who are these idiots ascribing "criminal mastermind" level talents to this young woman? She was an abused child who tried for years to cover it up.

Oh I'm sure the arrogant spoiled brat thinks she's a mastermind but it's not that deep. Unless you think Rachel Dolezal is a mastermind? It's just serial lying and shamelessly exploiting good-natured folks who believe what you tell them. Plus a hell of a lot of white privilege from a rich white girl. She doesn't get as far as she got if she's a poor Black boy from the East St Louis ghetto. With a Black boy, it's not a passive Zoom "interrogation" ( ), no, the campus cops are immediately called, the suspected financial aid fraud is immediately forwarded to the feds, and he's permanently banned from stepping foot on Penn real estate.