GA Case

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am not sure the defense attorneys actually understand what a conflict of interest is.

A conflict is when a member of the prosecution has a family member in the defense. Or if there is a financial relationship between the two parties.

Having people on the same side with a financial relationship or personal relationship is not a conflict.

This whole sideshow is a sham.

According to Georgia Code, this defines conflict of interest:

Conflict of interest” means an individual has multiple interests and uses his or her official position to exploit, in some way, his or her position for his or her own direct, unique, pecuniary, and personal benefit.

https://law.justia.com/codes/georgia/2022/title-45/chapter-10/article-2/part-6/section-45-10-90/#:~:text=“Conflict%20of%20interest”%20means%20an,legislative%20branch%20of%20state%20government.

And, the first attorney up - John Merchant pointed out that Fani Willis, as a public employee, is expected to maintain records as to gifts, etc.
She did not do that. She said she paid cash, but has no record of it.

My nephew buys cars with cash a few times per year. Mechanic. Fixes and flips. Where he lives people just want to get on with business. Nobody is writing out receipts.

He may have issues if the IRS comes knocking.

Fani Willis is a government employee and as such, should be maintaining impeccable records when it comes to her expenditures and gifts.
She has failed in that regard.

She probably does. Since there were no gifts here, there was nothing to record or track. The defense, which has the burden here, has not proven anything to the contrary.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am not sure the defense attorneys actually understand what a conflict of interest is.

A conflict is when a member of the prosecution has a family member in the defense. Or if there is a financial relationship between the two parties.

Having people on the same side with a financial relationship or personal relationship is not a conflict.

This whole sideshow is a sham.

According to Georgia Code, this defines conflict of interest:

Conflict of interest” means an individual has multiple interests and uses his or her official position to exploit, in some way, his or her position for his or her own direct, unique, pecuniary, and personal benefit.

https://law.justia.com/codes/georgia/2022/title-45/chapter-10/article-2/part-6/section-45-10-90/#:~:text=“Conflict%20of%20interest”%20means%20an,legislative%20branch%20of%20state%20government.

And, the first attorney up - John Merchant pointed out that Fani Willis, as a public employee, is expected to maintain records as to gifts, etc.
She did not do that. She said she paid cash, but has no record of it.

She didn't benefit in any way if, as her testimony suggests, she paid her own way. Hence no need for a record because there was no gift.

Right now, the receipts and evidence show that Wade paid for trips and outings for Fani that total over $15,000.
She claims to have paid Wade back - in cash.
As a public employee, especially a person in her position - she should have a record of such a repayment. She doesn't. He doesn't.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am not sure the defense attorneys actually understand what a conflict of interest is.

A conflict is when a member of the prosecution has a family member in the defense. Or if there is a financial relationship between the two parties.

Having people on the same side with a financial relationship or personal relationship is not a conflict.

This whole sideshow is a sham.

According to Georgia Code, this defines conflict of interest:

Conflict of interest” means an individual has multiple interests and uses his or her official position to exploit, in some way, his or her position for his or her own direct, unique, pecuniary, and personal benefit.

https://law.justia.com/codes/georgia/2022/title-45/chapter-10/article-2/part-6/section-45-10-90/#:~:text=“Conflict%20of%20interest”%20means%20an,legislative%20branch%20of%20state%20government.

And, the first attorney up - John Merchant pointed out that Fani Willis, as a public employee, is expected to maintain records as to gifts, etc.
She did not do that. She said she paid cash, but has no record of it.

My nephew buys cars with cash a few times per year. Mechanic. Fixes and flips. Where he lives people just want to get on with business. Nobody is writing out receipts.

He may have issues if the IRS comes knocking.

Fani Willis is a government employee and as such, should be maintaining impeccable records when it comes to her expenditures and gifts.
She has failed in that regard.

She probably does. Since there were no gifts here, there was nothing to record or track. The defense, which has the burden here, has not proven anything to the contrary.

The trips that Wade paid for appear to be gifts unless she can demonstrate that she indeed paid him back. She has no proof. She has no records. As a government employee, she should.

[Anonymous]

I’m watching “uh” the Fani Willis hearing and “um” Adam Abbate, one of Ms. Willis’ “um” attorneys, really needs “uh” to take “uh” some public speaking “um” classes.

[Anonymous]

You are struggling. When you hand over money to your relatives to cover your share of the family picnic you don't write or receive a receipt. You don't know anyone who does. You understand there was no gift received. You also understand that if someone actually did hand write receipts it would look differently. Classic damned if you do, dammed if you don't. You are trying to frame the narrative so that they are in the wrong no matter how they conducted themselves.

[Anonymous]

The DA attorney is as green as they come and yet his arguments and facts are a thousand percent better than the defense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You are struggling. When you hand over money to your relatives to cover your share of the family picnic you don't write or receive a receipt. You don't know anyone who does. You understand there was no gift received. You also understand that if someone actually did hand write receipts it would look differently. Classic damned if you do, dammed if you don't. You are trying to frame the narrative so that they are in the wrong no matter how they conducted themselves.

+1

The defense has absolutely no proof of their allegations and the dad actually corroburated Ms. Willis's claims.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You are struggling. When you hand over money to your relatives to cover your share of the family picnic you don't write or receive a receipt. You don't know anyone who does. You understand there was no gift received. You also understand that if someone actually did hand write receipts it would look differently. Classic damned if you do, dammed if you don't. You are trying to frame the narrative so that they are in the wrong no matter how they conducted themselves.

+1

The defense has absolutely no proof of their allegations and the dad actually corroburated Ms. Willis's claims.

The dad also admitted to watching and reading about the testimony the day before he testified. He watched everything she said on the stand.
The judge said about this fact that he could consider that toward his credibility.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am not sure the defense attorneys actually understand what a conflict of interest is.

A conflict is when a member of the prosecution has a family member in the defense. Or if there is a financial relationship between the two parties.

Having people on the same side with a financial relationship or personal relationship is not a conflict.

This whole sideshow is a sham.

According to Georgia Code, this defines conflict of interest:

Conflict of interest” means an individual has multiple interests and uses his or her official position to exploit, in some way, his or her position for his or her own direct, unique, pecuniary, and personal benefit.

https://law.justia.com/codes/georgia/2022/title-45/chapter-10/article-2/part-6/section-45-10-90/#:~:text=“Conflict%20of%20interest”%20means%20an,legislative%20branch%20of%20state%20government.

And, the first attorney up - John Merchant pointed out that Fani Willis, as a public employee, is expected to maintain records as to gifts, etc.
She did not do that. She said she paid cash, but has no record of it.

My nephew buys cars with cash a few times per year. Mechanic. Fixes and flips. Where he lives people just want to get on with business. Nobody is writing out receipts.

He may have issues if the IRS comes knocking.

Fani Willis is a government employee and as such, should be maintaining impeccable records when it comes to her expenditures and gifts.
She has failed in that regard.

She probably does. Since there were no gifts here, there was nothing to record or track. The defense, which has the burden here, has not proven anything to the contrary.

The trips that Wade paid for appear to be gifts unless she can demonstrate that she indeed paid him back. She has no proof. She has no records. As a government employee, she should.

The burden is on the defense, not Ms. Willis, to the claim.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am not sure the defense attorneys actually understand what a conflict of interest is.

A conflict is when a member of the prosecution has a family member in the defense. Or if there is a financial relationship between the two parties.

Having people on the same side with a financial relationship or personal relationship is not a conflict.

This whole sideshow is a sham.

According to Georgia Code, this defines conflict of interest:

Conflict of interest” means an individual has multiple interests and uses his or her official position to exploit, in some way, his or her position for his or her own direct, unique, pecuniary, and personal benefit.

https://law.justia.com/codes/georgia/2022/title-45/chapter-10/article-2/part-6/section-45-10-90/#:~:text=“Conflict%20of%20interest”%20means%20an,legislative%20branch%20of%20state%20government.

And, the first attorney up - John Merchant pointed out that Fani Willis, as a public employee, is expected to maintain records as to gifts, etc.
She did not do that. She said she paid cash, but has no record of it.

My nephew buys cars with cash a few times per year. Mechanic. Fixes and flips. Where he lives people just want to get on with business. Nobody is writing out receipts.

He may have issues if the IRS comes knocking.

Fani Willis is a government employee and as such, should be maintaining impeccable records when it comes to her expenditures and gifts.
She has failed in that regard.

She probably does. Since there were no gifts here, there was nothing to record or track. The defense, which has the burden here, has not proven anything to the contrary.

The trips that Wade paid for appear to be gifts unless she can demonstrate that she indeed paid him back. She has no proof. She has no records. As a government employee, she should.

The burden is on the defense, not Ms. Willis, to the claim.

Yet, as a public employee - she failed to keep records to confirm her claim.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am not sure the defense attorneys actually understand what a conflict of interest is.

A conflict is when a member of the prosecution has a family member in the defense. Or if there is a financial relationship between the two parties.

Having people on the same side with a financial relationship or personal relationship is not a conflict.

This whole sideshow is a sham.

According to Georgia Code, this defines conflict of interest:

Conflict of interest” means an individual has multiple interests and uses his or her official position to exploit, in some way, his or her position for his or her own direct, unique, pecuniary, and personal benefit.

https://law.justia.com/codes/georgia/2022/title-45/chapter-10/article-2/part-6/section-45-10-90/#:~:text=“Conflict%20of%20interest”%20means%20an,legislative%20branch%20of%20state%20government.

And, the first attorney up - John Merchant pointed out that Fani Willis, as a public employee, is expected to maintain records as to gifts, etc.
She did not do that. She said she paid cash, but has no record of it.

My nephew buys cars with cash a few times per year. Mechanic. Fixes and flips. Where he lives people just want to get on with business. Nobody is writing out receipts.

He may have issues if the IRS comes knocking.

Fani Willis is a government employee and as such, should be maintaining impeccable records when it comes to her expenditures and gifts.
She has failed in that regard.

She probably does. Since there were no gifts here, there was nothing to record or track. The defense, which has the burden here, has not proven anything to the contrary.

The trips that Wade paid for appear to be gifts unless she can demonstrate that she indeed paid him back. She has no proof. She has no records. As a government employee, she should.

The burden is on the defense, not Ms. Willis, to the claim.

Yet, as a public employee - she failed to keep records to confirm her claim.

What kind of records do you keep for your cash expenditures? How was she supposed to know that right wing investigators would be snooping around her private life years later in a court case?

That is such an unrealistic requirement. Again, the defense has the burden of proof here and they have none. It isn't up to her to help them out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You are struggling. When you hand over money to your relatives to cover your share of the family picnic you don't write or receive a receipt. You don't know anyone who does. You understand there was no gift received. You also understand that if someone actually did hand write receipts it would look differently. Classic damned if you do, dammed if you don't. You are trying to frame the narrative so that they are in the wrong no matter how they conducted themselves.

How often does one reimburse a boyfriend for trips?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am not sure the defense attorneys actually understand what a conflict of interest is.

A conflict is when a member of the prosecution has a family member in the defense. Or if there is a financial relationship between the two parties.

Having people on the same side with a financial relationship or personal relationship is not a conflict.

This whole sideshow is a sham.

According to Georgia Code, this defines conflict of interest:

Conflict of interest” means an individual has multiple interests and uses his or her official position to exploit, in some way, his or her position for his or her own direct, unique, pecuniary, and personal benefit.

https://law.justia.com/codes/georgia/2022/title-45/chapter-10/article-2/part-6/section-45-10-90/#:~:text=“Conflict%20of%20interest”%20means%20an,legislative%20branch%20of%20state%20government.

And, the first attorney up - John Merchant pointed out that Fani Willis, as a public employee, is expected to maintain records as to gifts, etc.
She did not do that. She said she paid cash, but has no record of it.

My nephew buys cars with cash a few times per year. Mechanic. Fixes and flips. Where he lives people just want to get on with business. Nobody is writing out receipts.

He may have issues if the IRS comes knocking.

Fani Willis is a government employee and as such, should be maintaining impeccable records when it comes to her expenditures and gifts.
She has failed in that regard.

She probably does. Since there were no gifts here, there was nothing to record or track. The defense, which has the burden here, has not proven anything to the contrary.

The trips that Wade paid for appear to be gifts unless she can demonstrate that she indeed paid him back. She has no proof. She has no records. As a government employee, she should.

The burden is on the defense, not Ms. Willis, to the claim.

Yet, as a public employee - she failed to keep records to confirm her claim.

Like justice Thomas did, right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You are struggling. When you hand over money to your relatives to cover your share of the family picnic you don't write or receive a receipt. You don't know anyone who does. You understand there was no gift received. You also understand that if someone actually did hand write receipts it would look differently. Classic damned if you do, dammed if you don't. You are trying to frame the narrative so that they are in the wrong no matter how they conducted themselves.

Relatives? Who's related in this group?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You are struggling. When you hand over money to your relatives to cover your share of the family picnic you don't write or receive a receipt. You don't know anyone who does. You understand there was no gift received. You also understand that if someone actually did hand write receipts it would look differently. Classic damned if you do, dammed if you don't. You are trying to frame the narrative so that they are in the wrong no matter how they conducted themselves.

How often does one reimburse a boyfriend for trips?

Hard to say what adulterers do.